Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
125 lines (100 loc) · 11.6 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

125 lines (100 loc) · 11.6 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for onevcat/fengniao

Objective: Execute Arbitrary Code OR Exfiltrate Sensitive Data via fengniao

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Execute Arbitrary Code OR Exfiltrate Sensitive Data via fengniao

├── 1.  Exploit Vulnerabilities in fengniao's Parsing Logic
│   ├── 1.1  Craft Malicious Input File (e.g., .swift, .m, .strings)
│   │   ├── 1.1.1  Buffer Overflow in String Parsing
│   │   │   └── 1.1.1.1  Overwrite Return Address to Shellcode (Critical Node)
│   │   ├── 1.1.2  Format String Vulnerability in String Processing
│   │   │   └── 1.1.2.1  Use %n specifier to write to arbitrary memory locations (Critical Node)
│   │   ├── 1.1.3  Path Traversal in File Handling (if fengniao accesses files based on parsed content)
│   │   │   └── 1.1.3.1  Read arbitrary files on the system (e.g., /etc/passwd) (Critical Node)
│   │   │   └── 1.1.3.2  Write to arbitrary files on the system (e.g., overwrite system binaries) (Critical Node)
│   │   ├── 1.1.5  XML External Entity (XXE) Injection (if fengniao parses XML-based .strings files)
│   │   │   └── 1.1.5.1  Include external entities to read local files or access internal network resources (Critical Node)
│   ├── 1.2  Exploit Dependencies (if fengniao has vulnerable dependencies)
│   │   └── 1.2.1  Identify and exploit known vulnerabilities in a dependency. (High Risk)
│
├── 2.  Manipulate fengniao's Output
│   ├── 2.1  Inject Malicious Code into Generated Files
│   │   └── 2.1.1  If fengniao modifies existing files, inject code through carefully crafted input strings. (Critical Node)
│   ├── 2.2  Exfiltrate Data Through Output Files
│   │   └── 2.2.1  Craft input that causes fengniao to include sensitive data (discovered during parsing) in output. (Critical Node)
│   │   └── 2.2.2  Use a path traversal vulnerability (1.1.3) to write output to a location accessible to the attacker. (High Risk - relies on 1.1.3)
│
└── 3.  Exploit fengniao's Command-Line Interface (CLI)
    ├── 3.1  Argument Injection
    │   └── 3.1.1  If fengniao uses user-supplied arguments without proper sanitization, inject malicious commands.  (e.g., using backticks or semicolons) (Critical Node)

Attack Tree Path: 1.1 Craft Malicious Input File

This is the primary entry point for many attacks. The attacker provides a specially crafted file (e.g., a .swift, .m, or .strings file) designed to exploit vulnerabilities in how fengniao parses these files.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.1 Buffer Overflow in String Parsing (Critical Node)

  • Description: If fengniao doesn't properly handle string lengths when parsing input files, an attacker can provide an overly long string that overflows a buffer. This can overwrite adjacent memory, including the return address on the stack.
  • 1.1.1.1 Overwrite Return Address to Shellcode: By carefully crafting the overflowing string, the attacker can overwrite the return address to point to their own malicious code (shellcode). When the function returns, control is transferred to the attacker's code.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Depends on the presence of buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the parsing code. Modern languages and libraries often have protections, but vulnerabilities can still exist.)
  • Impact: Very High (Complete control of the application, potentially leading to system compromise.)
  • Effort: Medium to High (Requires understanding of buffer overflows, assembly language, and shellcode development.)
  • Skill Level: Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Can be detected by fuzzing, static analysis, and runtime protections like stack canaries, but sophisticated exploits can bypass some defenses.)

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.2 Format String Vulnerability in String Processing (Critical Node)

  • Description: If fengniao uses format string functions (like printf in C or similar functions in other languages) with user-controlled input, an attacker can use format specifiers (e.g., %x, %n) to read from or write to arbitrary memory locations.
  • 1.1.2.1 Use %n specifier to write to arbitrary memory locations: The %n specifier is particularly dangerous, as it writes the number of bytes written so far to a memory address specified by a corresponding argument. This can be used to overwrite function pointers, return addresses, or other critical data.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Less common than buffer overflows, but still a significant risk if format string functions are used improperly.)
  • Impact: Very High (Arbitrary code execution, similar to buffer overflows.)
  • Effort: Medium (Requires understanding of format string vulnerabilities and how to craft exploit payloads.)
  • Skill Level: Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Static analysis tools can often detect format string vulnerabilities.)

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.3 Path Traversal in File Handling (Critical Node)

  • Description: If fengniao constructs file paths based on user input without proper sanitization, an attacker can use ".." sequences to traverse the file system and access or modify files outside of the intended directory.
  • 1.1.3.1 Read arbitrary files on the system (e.g., /etc/passwd): The attacker could read sensitive files like /etc/passwd (on Unix-like systems) to obtain user information.
  • 1.1.3.2 Write to arbitrary files on the system (e.g., overwrite system binaries): The attacker could overwrite system binaries or configuration files, potentially gaining control of the system or disrupting its operation.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Depends on how file paths are constructed and validated.)
  • Impact: High to Very High (Information disclosure, system compromise, denial of service.)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Relatively easy to test for and exploit if present.)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Can be detected by fuzzing and code review.)

Attack Tree Path: 1.1.5 XML External Entity (XXE) Injection (Critical Node)

  • Description: If fengniao parses XML files (e.g., .strings files in XML format) and doesn't disable external entity resolution, an attacker can inject malicious XML that references external entities.
  • 1.1.5.1 Include external entities to read local files or access internal network resources: The attacker can define entities that point to local files (e.g., /etc/passwd) or internal network resources (e.g., internal web servers). This allows the attacker to read sensitive data or potentially interact with internal services.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Depends on whether XML parsing is used and if external entities are disabled.)
  • Impact: High (Information disclosure, potential for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).)
  • Effort: Low to Medium
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Specialized XML security scanners can detect XXE vulnerabilities.)

Attack Tree Path: 1.2.1 Exploit Dependencies (High Risk)

  • Description: fengniao, like most software, likely relies on external libraries or dependencies. If any of these dependencies have known vulnerabilities, an attacker can exploit them to compromise fengniao itself.
  • Likelihood: High (Dependencies are a common attack vector. New vulnerabilities are discovered regularly.)
  • Impact: Varies (Depends on the vulnerability in the dependency. Could range from minor information disclosure to complete system compromise.)
  • Effort: Low to High (Exploiting known vulnerabilities is often easy; finding and exploiting zero-days is much harder.)
  • Skill Level: Varies (From script kiddie using public exploits to advanced attackers developing custom exploits.)
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Dependency scanning tools can identify known vulnerable dependencies.)

Attack Tree Path: 2.1.1 Inject Malicious Code into Generated Files (Critical Node)

  • Description: If fengniao modifies existing files, and the modification logic is flawed, an attacker could inject malicious code into those files. This is particularly dangerous if the modified files are executable or configuration files.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Depends on how fengniao modifies files and if it properly sanitizes input before writing it to files.)
  • Impact: Very High (Code execution in the context of the user running the modified files.)
  • Effort: Medium (Requires understanding of the file format and how fengniao modifies it.)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Code review and careful testing can help identify this type of vulnerability.)

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.1 Exfiltrate Data Through Output Files (Critical Node)

  • Description: If fengniao processes sensitive data (e.g., API keys, passwords) and includes this data in its output files, an attacker could potentially gain access to this information.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Depends on whether fengniao handles sensitive data and how it's included in the output.)
  • Impact: High (Data breach, potential for further attacks.)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Depends on how the output is stored and accessed.)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Monitoring file access and network traffic can help detect data exfiltration.)

Attack Tree Path: 2.2.2 Use a path traversal vulnerability (1.1.3) to write output to a location accessible to the attacker (High Risk)

  • Description: This is a combination of two vulnerabilities. If an attacker can control the output path (via path traversal) and fengniao includes sensitive data in its output, the attacker can write that data to a location they can access.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Dependent on the presence of a path traversal vulnerability.)
  • Impact: Very High (Data exfiltration, potential for further attacks.)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Relies on exploiting the path traversal vulnerability.)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Similar to detecting path traversal vulnerabilities.)

Attack Tree Path: 3.1.1 Argument Injection (Critical Node)

  • Description: If fengniao executes system commands and uses user-supplied arguments without proper sanitization, an attacker can inject arbitrary commands.
  • Likelihood: Medium to High (Depends on how command-line arguments are handled. This is a common vulnerability in command-line tools.)
  • Impact: Very High (Arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the user running fengniao.)
  • Effort: Low (Often very easy to exploit if present.)
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Code review and input validation can help prevent this.)