Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
38 lines (31 loc) · 4.85 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

38 lines (31 loc) · 4.85 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for onevcat/kingfisher

Attack Surface: Malicious URL Injection

  • Description: Kingfisher processes URLs for image loading. If an application uses untrusted sources for these URLs without proper validation, attackers can inject malicious URLs.
  • Kingfisher Contribution: Kingfisher directly fetches and processes content from provided URLs. It does not inherently validate the safety or legitimacy of the URL itself.
  • Example: An attacker injects a URL pointing to a resource that triggers a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) if Kingfisher is used in a server-side Swift context, or a URL that redirects through multiple hops to a very large file causing Denial of Service on the client.
  • Impact: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (High - in server-side contexts), Denial of Service (DoS) (High - client-side resource exhaustion), potential redirection to harmful content.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict URL Validation: Implement robust input validation and sanitization for all URLs before passing them to Kingfisher. Use allowlists of trusted domains and URL schemes.
    • Content-Type Verification: Check the Content-Type header of the downloaded resource to ensure it matches expected image types before Kingfisher processes it.
    • Resource Limits: Configure Kingfisher's download settings with timeouts and size limits to prevent excessive resource consumption from maliciously crafted URLs leading to large downloads.

Attack Surface: Image Processing Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Kingfisher relies on underlying image decoding libraries. Specially crafted images can exploit vulnerabilities in these libraries when processed by Kingfisher.
  • Kingfisher Contribution: Kingfisher uses system image decoding libraries or potentially internal processing to handle various image formats. Vulnerabilities in these libraries become exploitable when Kingfisher decodes images.
  • Example: An attacker provides a specially crafted PNG image that triggers a buffer overflow vulnerability in the system's PNG decoding library when Kingfisher attempts to display it. This could lead to application crash or potentially memory corruption.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) (High - application crash), Memory Corruption (High), potential for Remote Code Execution (Critical - though less likely in sandboxed environments, still a severe theoretical risk).
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep System Libraries Updated: Ensure the underlying operating system and its image processing libraries are regularly updated with the latest security patches. This is primarily a user/system-level mitigation.
    • Kingfisher Updates: Keep Kingfisher updated to the latest version. Updates may include fixes or workarounds for vulnerabilities in image handling or related dependencies.
    • Content-Type Validation & Format Restrictions: Validate the Content-Type and potentially restrict the image formats Kingfisher is allowed to process to reduce the attack surface if specific vulnerable formats are identified.

Attack Surface: Dependency Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Kingfisher depends on other libraries. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can indirectly affect applications using Kingfisher.
  • Kingfisher Contribution: Kingfisher utilizes external libraries for networking and other functionalities. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies become part of the attack surface for applications using Kingfisher.
  • Example: A critical Remote Code Execution vulnerability is discovered in SwiftNIO, a networking library used by Kingfisher. Applications using Kingfisher with the vulnerable SwiftNIO version become indirectly vulnerable to remote code execution through network interactions facilitated by Kingfisher.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (Critical), Denial of Service (High), other impacts depending on the specific dependency vulnerability.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the dependency vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Dependency Updates: Keep Kingfisher and all its dependencies updated to the latest versions. Utilize dependency management tools to track and update dependencies promptly.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Implement dependency vulnerability scanning in the development pipeline to proactively identify and address vulnerable dependencies used by Kingfisher.
    • Dependency Pinning (with caution): While not always recommended long-term, in critical situations, consider pinning Kingfisher to a version known to use secure dependency versions while awaiting updates, but ensure to update as soon as secure versions are available.