Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
264 lines (179 loc) · 17.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

264 lines (179 loc) · 17.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for quick/nimble

Mitigation Strategy: Pin Dependency Versions in .nimble files

  • Mitigation Strategy: Pin Dependency Versions in .nimble files

    • Description:

      1. Open your project's .nimble file.
      2. Locate the requires section.
      3. Replace version ranges (e.g., requires "package >= 1.0.0") with exact versions (e.g., requires "package = 1.2.3").
      4. Run nimble install to update nimble.lock with pinned versions.
      5. Commit both .nimble and nimble.lock to version control.
      6. Manually review and update versions in .nimble for future updates, regenerating nimble.lock after testing.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Dependency Confusion/Substitution Attacks (Medium Severity): Prevents automatic upgrades to potentially malicious packages with the same name but higher version number from public registries.
      • Unexpected Vulnerability Introduction via Auto-Updates (Medium Severity): Avoids unknowingly pulling in new dependency versions with vulnerabilities or regressions.
      • Build Reproducibility Issues (Low Severity, Security Impact): Ensures consistent builds by preventing version drift.

    • Impact:

      • Dependency Confusion/Substitution Attacks: High Reduction. Significantly reduces risk by preventing automatic malicious upgrades.
      • Unexpected Vulnerability Introduction via Auto-Updates: Medium Reduction. Reduces unintentional vulnerability introduction, but requires manual vulnerability monitoring.
      • Build Reproducibility Issues: High Reduction. Eliminates version drift inconsistencies.

    • Currently Implemented: To be determined. Check project's .nimble file for version ranges vs. pinned versions.

    • Missing Implementation: If .nimble uses version ranges, update to pinned versions for enhanced security and reproducibility.

Mitigation Strategy: Nimble Dependency Vulnerability Scanning in CI/CD

  • Mitigation Strategy: Nimble Dependency Vulnerability Scanning in CI/CD

    • Description:

      1. Select a dependency scanner capable of analyzing Nimble projects or nimble.lock files.
      2. Integrate the scanner into your CI/CD pipeline as a step after nimble install.
      3. Configure alerts to notify the development team of detected vulnerabilities in Nimble dependencies.
      4. Establish a process to address reported vulnerabilities by updating dependencies or applying patches.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Known Vulnerabilities in Nimble Dependencies (High Severity): Detects and alerts on publicly known vulnerabilities in used Nimble packages.
      • Supply Chain Attacks via Vulnerable Nimble Dependencies (High Severity): Reduces risk of incorporating vulnerable components through Nimble dependencies.

    • Impact:

      • Known Vulnerabilities in Nimble Dependencies: High Reduction. Automates vulnerability detection, significantly reducing deployment risk.
      • Supply Chain Attacks via Vulnerable Nimble Dependencies: Medium Reduction. Relies on database accuracy and scanner effectiveness.

    • Currently Implemented: To be determined. Check CI/CD pipeline for Nimble dependency scanning integration.

    • Missing Implementation: Integrate Nimble dependency scanning into the CI/CD pipeline.

Mitigation Strategy: Verify Nimble Package Authors and Sources

  • Mitigation Strategy: Verify Nimble Package Authors and Sources

    • Description:

      1. Before adding a Nimble dependency, research the package on the Nimble packages website or source code repositories (e.g., GitHub).
      2. Assess the author's reputation and the project's source. Look for established developers/organizations and active, community-involved projects.
      3. Exercise caution with packages from anonymous authors, especially those performing sensitive operations.
      4. Consider package popularity and usage as an indicator of community vetting.
      5. Seek recommendations from trusted Nim community members if unsure.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Malicious Nimble Package Injection (High Severity): Reduces risk of introducing malicious packages by vetting sources and authors.
      • Compromised Nimble Package Uploads (Medium Severity): Indirectly reduces risk by favoring reputable sources.

    • Impact:

      • Malicious Nimble Package Injection: Medium Reduction. Relies on manual judgment but increases attacker difficulty.
      • Compromised Nimble Package Uploads: Low Reduction. Indirect protection through source reputation.

    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Informal review likely occurs, but formal process may be absent.

    • Missing Implementation: Formalize package verification in dependency management workflow. Document guidelines for author/source evaluation.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Review of Critical Nimble Dependencies

  • Mitigation Strategy: Code Review of Critical Nimble Dependencies

    • Description:

      1. Identify critical Nimble dependencies handling sensitive data or core application functions.
      2. Conduct source code reviews for these dependencies.
      3. Focus on functionality, security vulnerabilities (injection flaws, data handling), and suspicious code.
      4. Involve security experts in reviews.
      5. Document findings and address concerns by patching, forking, or replacing dependencies.
      6. Periodically repeat reviews, especially for major version updates.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Backdoors and Malicious Code in Nimble Dependencies (High Severity): Increases detection of malicious code in dependencies.
      • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in Nimble Dependencies (High Severity): May uncover unknown vulnerabilities.
      • Logic Bugs and Design Flaws in Nimble Dependencies (Medium Severity, Security Impact): Identifies exploitable logic errors.

    • Impact:

      • Backdoors and Malicious Code in Nimble Dependencies: Medium to High Reduction. Effective with thorough reviews by skilled personnel.
      • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in Nimble Dependencies: Low to Medium Reduction. Increases chance of discovery compared to relying solely on public reports.
      • Logic Bugs and Design Flaws in Nimble Dependencies: Medium Reduction. Effective for identifying flaws missed by automated tools.

    • Currently Implemented: Likely ad-hoc for sensitive components, not systematically for all dependencies.

    • Missing Implementation: Establish formal code review process for critical Nimble dependencies. Define criteria for criticality and allocate resources.

Mitigation Strategy: Review Nimble Package Build Scripts (.nimble files`)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Review Nimble Package Build Scripts (.nimble files`)

    • Description:

      1. Examine build and install sections of .nimble files when adding/updating dependencies.
      2. Analyze commands for suspicious actions:
        • Untrusted network access during build/install.
        • Unexpected file system modifications.
        • Execution of external scripts from untrusted sources.
        • Obfuscated build logic.
      3. Investigate suspicious activity and consider package author contact or community advice.
      4. Avoid risky packages or fork and modify build scripts to remove risks.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Malicious Nimble Build Script Execution (High Severity): Prevents malicious commands during nimble install.
      • Build-Time Supply Chain Attacks via Nimble (Medium Severity): Reduces risk of build process compromise.

    • Impact:

      • Malicious Nimble Build Script Execution: High Reduction. Direct review effectively identifies malicious commands.
      • Build-Time Supply Chain Attacks via Nimble: Medium Reduction. Requires vigilance but makes malicious actions harder to hide.

    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Casual review may occur, but systematic process is likely missing.

    • Missing Implementation: Incorporate build script review into dependency workflow. Develop guidelines for suspicious behavior and developer training.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Nimble Checksum Verification (with Caution)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Nimble Checksum Verification (with Caution)

    • Description:

      1. Nimble supports checksum verification for downloaded packages. Ensure this feature is enabled (default in recent Nimble versions).
      2. When adding dependencies, Nimble will download and verify package checksums against the registry.
      3. While helpful, do not rely solely on checksums as registry compromise can lead to malicious checksums.
      4. Use checksum verification as an additional layer of security, alongside other mitigation strategies.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Package Tampering in Transit (Low to Medium Severity): Protects against man-in-the-middle attacks that might alter packages during download.
      • Accidental Package Corruption (Low Severity): Detects corrupted packages due to network issues or storage errors.

    • Impact:

      • Package Tampering in Transit: Low to Medium Reduction. Effective against transit tampering, but not registry compromises.
      • Accidental Package Corruption: Low Reduction. Prevents issues from accidental corruption.

    • Currently Implemented: Likely implemented by default in Nimble if using a recent version. Verify Nimble configuration.

    • Missing Implementation: If checksum verification is disabled in Nimble configuration, enable it.

Mitigation Strategy: Use a Private Nimble Registry (For Sensitive Projects)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Use a Private Nimble Registry (For Sensitive Projects)

    • Description:

      1. For highly sensitive projects, consider setting up a private Nimble registry.
      2. This gives you full control over packages available to your team.
      3. Alternatively, mirror a trusted public registry and curate packages allowed in your private mirror.
      4. This significantly reduces the risk of supply chain attacks through the public Nimble registry.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Malicious Package Injection via Public Registry (High Severity): Eliminates risk of malicious packages from the public registry.
      • Dependency Confusion/Substitution Attacks via Public Registry (Medium Severity): Prevents attacks targeting the public registry.

    • Impact:

      • Malicious Package Injection via Public Registry: High Reduction. Effectively eliminates this threat vector.
      • Dependency Confusion/Substitution Attacks via Public Registry: High Reduction. Significantly reduces risk by controlling package sources.

    • Currently Implemented: Likely not implemented unless project has specific high-security requirements.

    • Missing Implementation: Consider implementing for projects with stringent security needs. Requires infrastructure setup and maintenance.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep Nimble Tool Updated

  • Mitigation Strategy: Keep Nimble Tool Updated

    • Description:

      1. Regularly check for updates to the Nimble package manager itself.
      2. Update Nimble to the latest stable version using official Nimble update methods.
      3. Updates often include bug fixes and security improvements in Nimble itself.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Vulnerabilities in Nimble Tool Itself (Medium to High Severity): Addresses potential security flaws within the Nimble package manager.

    • Impact:

      • Vulnerabilities in Nimble Tool Itself: Medium to High Reduction. Depends on the severity of vulnerabilities patched in updates.

    • Currently Implemented: To be determined. Check Nimble update frequency and process.

    • Missing Implementation: Establish a process for regularly checking and applying Nimble updates.

Mitigation Strategy: Use Official Nimble Installation Methods

  • Mitigation Strategy: Use Official Nimble Installation Methods

    • Description:

      1. Install Nimble using official methods recommended by the Nimble and Nim language teams (e.g., choosenim, official binaries).
      2. Avoid installing Nimble from untrusted sources or using unofficial installation scripts. This reduces the risk of installing a compromised Nimble tool from the outset.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Compromised Nimble Tool Installation (High Severity): Prevents installation of a backdoored or malicious Nimble package manager.

    • Impact:

      • Compromised Nimble Tool Installation: High Reduction. Prevents initial compromise of the Nimble tool itself.

    • Currently Implemented: To be determined. Verify Nimble installation method used in development environments.

    • Missing Implementation: Ensure all developers use official Nimble installation methods. Document and enforce this practice.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Nimble Package Build Script Complexity

  • Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Nimble Package Build Script Complexity

    • Description:

      1. When creating your own Nimble packages, keep build scripts in .nimble files as simple and minimal as possible.
      2. Avoid unnecessary complexity or external script execution in build scripts.
      3. Simpler scripts are easier to audit and less likely to contain vulnerabilities or unexpected behavior.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Accidental Vulnerabilities in Build Scripts (Low to Medium Severity): Reduces the chance of introducing unintentional security flaws in complex build scripts.
      • Obfuscation of Malicious Actions in Build Scripts (Medium Severity): Simpler scripts make it harder to hide malicious commands.

    • Impact:

      • Accidental Vulnerabilities in Build Scripts: Low to Medium Reduction. Reduces likelihood of unintentional flaws.
      • Obfuscation of Malicious Actions in Build Scripts: Medium Reduction. Improves build script auditability.

    • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Developers may naturally write simpler scripts, but explicit guidelines might be missing.

    • Missing Implementation: Establish guidelines for minimal and secure Nimble build script design for internal packages.

Mitigation Strategy: Review Nimble Configuration Files

  • Mitigation Strategy: Review Nimble Configuration Files

    • Description:

      1. Understand Nimble configuration options (e.g., in nimble.ini or project-specific .nimble files).
      2. Ensure Nimble configuration is set securely. Pay attention to settings related to package sources and download locations.
      3. Avoid insecure or overly permissive configurations.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Misconfiguration of Nimble Leading to Security Issues (Low to Medium Severity): Prevents vulnerabilities arising from insecure Nimble settings.

    • Impact:

      • Misconfiguration of Nimble Leading to Security Issues: Low to Medium Reduction. Depends on the specific misconfiguration and its potential impact.

    • Currently Implemented: To be determined. Review Nimble configuration files for secure settings.

    • Missing Implementation: Document and enforce secure Nimble configuration practices. Regularly review configuration settings.

Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Unnecessary Global Nimble Configurations

  • Mitigation Strategy: Avoid Unnecessary Global Nimble Configurations

    • Description:

      1. Prefer project-specific Nimble configurations (within .nimble files) over global configurations (in nimble.ini).
      2. Project-specific configurations limit the scope of settings and reduce the risk of unintended consequences from global settings affecting multiple projects.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Unintended Consequences from Global Nimble Settings (Low Severity): Prevents unintended security impacts from overly broad global configurations.

    • Impact:

      • Unintended Consequences from Global Nimble Settings: Low Reduction. Reduces risk of misconfigurations affecting multiple projects.

    • Currently Implemented: To be determined. Check Nimble configuration practices and encourage project-specific configurations.

    • Missing Implementation: Promote and enforce project-specific Nimble configurations over global settings where feasible.