Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
94 lines (69 loc) · 184 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

94 lines (69 loc) · 184 KB

Deep Analysis of Realm Cocoa Security

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of the Realm Cocoa library (realm-cocoa on GitHub) and its implications for applications that utilize it. This includes analyzing key components, identifying potential vulnerabilities, and providing actionable mitigation strategies. The focus is on the local database functionality, with secondary consideration given to the optional Realm Object Server integration. We aim to identify security risks specific to Realm Cocoa and provide tailored recommendations, not generic security advice.

Scope:

This analysis covers the following:

  • Realm Core (Storage Engine): The underlying database engine responsible for data persistence, transactions, and encryption.
  • Realm Cocoa API: The Objective-C and Swift interface that developers use to interact with the database.
  • Realm Database File (.realm): The on-device file format and its security characteristics.
  • Integration with iOS Keychain: How Realm Cocoa utilizes the Keychain for encryption key management.
  • Interaction with Realm Object Server (Optional): Security considerations when using Realm Sync for data synchronization.
  • Build and Deployment Processes: Security aspects of the library's build and how it's integrated into applications.

This analysis excludes the following:

  • Application-Specific Logic: Security vulnerabilities arising from the application's own code, except where it directly interacts with Realm Cocoa.
  • Realm Object Server (Detailed Analysis): While we touch on the security of Realm Sync, a full security review of the server is outside the scope. We focus on the client-side implications.
  • Operating System Security: We assume a reasonably secure iOS/macOS environment, but vulnerabilities in the OS itself are not in scope.

Methodology:

  1. Code Review (Inferred): While we don't have direct access to the proprietary Realm Core source code, we will infer its behavior and security implications based on the public Realm Cocoa API, documentation, and observed behavior. We will analyze the open-source components (realm-cocoa) on GitHub.
  2. Documentation Review: We will thoroughly examine the official Realm documentation for security-related features, best practices, and known limitations.
  3. Threat Modeling: We will identify potential threats and attack vectors based on the architecture and functionality of Realm Cocoa.
  4. Vulnerability Analysis: We will assess the likelihood and impact of potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Mitigation Recommendations: We will provide specific, actionable recommendations to mitigate identified risks.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1 Realm Core (Storage Engine)

  • Inferred Architecture: Realm Core is a cross-platform, object-oriented database engine written primarily in C++. It handles data persistence, indexing, transactions, and concurrency control. It's designed for performance and efficiency.
  • Security Implications:
    • Encryption at Rest (AES-256 + SHA-2): Realm Core implements the optional encryption. The strength of this encryption depends heavily on the key management. If encryption is not enabled, data is stored in plaintext, making it vulnerable to unauthorized access if the device is compromised or the file is extracted.
    • Data Integrity: Realm Core uses checksums and transactional mechanisms to ensure data consistency and prevent corruption. However, bugs in the engine could still lead to data loss or corruption. This is a critical area for ongoing testing and fuzzing.
    • Memory Safety: As a C++ codebase, Realm Core is potentially vulnerable to memory corruption vulnerabilities (buffer overflows, use-after-free, etc.). These could be exploited to gain arbitrary code execution. Rigorous testing and static analysis are crucial.
    • Query Engine: The query engine, while not directly exposed as SQL, could still be susceptible to injection-like attacks if user-provided data is used to construct queries without proper sanitization. This is primarily a concern for the API layer, but the Core must handle potentially malicious query structures safely.
    • File Format: The .realm file format is proprietary. While this provides some obscurity, it's not a security guarantee. Reverse engineering the file format could reveal vulnerabilities or allow attackers to tamper with the data.

2.2 Realm Cocoa API

  • Architecture: The Realm Cocoa API provides Objective-C and Swift wrappers around the Realm Core engine. It exposes classes and methods for interacting with the database (creating, reading, updating, and deleting objects, performing queries, managing transactions, etc.).
  • Security Implications:
    • Input Validation: The API must perform some level of input validation to prevent invalid data from being passed to the Core engine. However, the primary responsibility for input validation lies with the application developer. Failure to sanitize user input before using it in Realm queries can lead to injection-like vulnerabilities. For example, constructing a predicate string directly from user input is highly dangerous.
    • API Misuse: Incorrect use of the API (e.g., improper transaction management, failing to close Realm instances) could lead to data corruption or resource leaks. The API should be designed to be as safe as possible, but developer education is also important.
    • Threading Issues: Realm has specific threading rules. Incorrect use of Realm across multiple threads can lead to crashes or data corruption. The API and documentation must clearly define these rules, and developers must adhere to them.
    • Object-Level Permissions (with Realm Sync): When using Realm Sync, the API provides methods for setting object-level permissions. Misconfiguration of these permissions could lead to unauthorized data access. The API should provide clear guidance and sensible defaults.

2.3 Realm Database File (.realm)

  • Architecture: The .realm file is a memory-mapped file containing the database data. Realm uses a custom, optimized format for storing objects and their relationships.
  • Security Implications:
    • Plaintext Storage (Without Encryption): If encryption is not enabled, the data within the .realm file is stored in plaintext. This is a significant vulnerability if the device is compromised or the file is extracted.
    • File Permissions (iOS/macOS): The security of the .realm file relies, in part, on the file system permissions enforced by the operating system. iOS sandboxing generally protects application data, but vulnerabilities in the OS or jailbreaking could bypass these protections.
    • Data Remnants: When objects are deleted, the space they occupied in the .realm file may not be immediately overwritten. This could potentially allow recovery of deleted data. Realm should implement secure deletion mechanisms (e.g., overwriting deleted data with zeros) to mitigate this risk.
    • File Integrity: The .realm file should be resistant to tampering. Realm Core likely uses checksums or other integrity checks to detect corruption. However, a sophisticated attacker could potentially modify the file and bypass these checks.

2.4 Integration with iOS Keychain

  • Architecture: When encryption is enabled, Realm Cocoa uses the iOS Keychain to store the 64-byte encryption key. The Keychain is a secure storage facility provided by iOS for storing small pieces of sensitive data (passwords, keys, certificates, etc.).
  • Security Implications:
    • Keychain Security: The security of the encryption key depends entirely on the security of the Keychain. If the Keychain is compromised (e.g., through a vulnerability in iOS or a jailbreak), the encryption key can be extracted, and the Realm database can be decrypted.
    • Keychain Access Control: Realm Cocoa should use appropriate access control settings when storing the key in the Keychain. This ensures that only the application that created the key can access it. Incorrect access control settings could allow other malicious applications to retrieve the key.
    • Key Derivation: Realm documentation states it uses AES-256 + SHA-2. It is important to understand how the key is derived. If a user-provided password is used, a strong key derivation function (KDF) like PBKDF2, Argon2, or scrypt must be used to protect against brute-force attacks. The documentation should clearly specify the KDF and its parameters.
    • Key Persistence: It's crucial to understand how the key persists across application launches and device reboots. The Keychain provides different persistence options (e.g., kSecAttrAccessibleWhenUnlocked, kSecAttrAccessibleAfterFirstUnlock). Realm should use the most appropriate option based on the security requirements and user experience considerations. kSecAttrAccessibleAfterFirstUnlockThisDeviceOnly is generally recommended for sensitive data.

2.5 Interaction with Realm Object Server (Optional)

  • Architecture: Realm Object Server handles data synchronization, user authentication, and access control for Realm databases. Communication between the client (Realm Cocoa) and the server occurs over a TLS-encrypted connection.
  • Security Implications:
    • TLS Configuration: The security of the communication channel depends on the TLS configuration. Realm should use strong cipher suites, up-to-date TLS versions (TLS 1.3 is preferred), and proper certificate validation to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.
    • Authentication: Realm Object Server provides authentication mechanisms (username/password, email/password, third-party providers). The security of these mechanisms is crucial. Strong password policies, secure storage of credentials, and protection against brute-force attacks are essential.
    • Authorization (Object-Level Permissions): Realm Object Server enforces object-level permissions defined by the application. Misconfiguration of these permissions could lead to unauthorized data access. The server should provide robust access control mechanisms and prevent privilege escalation attacks.
    • Server Security: The security of the Realm Object Server itself is paramount. It should be regularly updated, hardened, and monitored for security vulnerabilities. A compromised server could expose all synchronized data. This is outside the scope of this review, but is a critical dependency.

2.6 Build and Deployment Processes

  • Architecture: Realm Cocoa is built using GitHub Actions and distributed via CocoaPods, Carthage, and Swift Package Manager.
  • Security Implications:
    • GitHub Actions Security: The build process relies on GitHub Actions. Misconfiguration of the Actions workflow, or compromise of the GitHub repository, could allow attackers to inject malicious code into the Realm Cocoa framework.
    • Code Signing: The Realm Cocoa framework must be code-signed by Realm to ensure its authenticity and integrity. This prevents attackers from distributing modified versions of the framework. Developers should verify the code signature before using the framework.
    • Package Manager Security: The security of the package managers (CocoaPods, Carthage, SPM) is also important. While these are generally trusted, vulnerabilities in the package managers themselves could allow attackers to distribute malicious packages. Developers should use the latest versions of the package managers and verify the integrity of downloaded packages.
    • Dependency Management: Realm Cocoa likely has third-party dependencies. These dependencies should be carefully reviewed for security vulnerabilities. Automated dependency scanning tools should be integrated into the build process to identify and address known vulnerabilities.
    • SAST/DAST: Static and dynamic analysis tools should be used during the build process to identify potential vulnerabilities in the Realm Cocoa code.

3. Threat Modeling and Vulnerability Analysis

| Threat | Attack Vector | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation Strategies