Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
55 lines (46 loc) · 6.7 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

55 lines (46 loc) · 6.7 KB

Threat Model Analysis for rxswiftcommunity/rxdatasources

Threat: High-Frequency UI Update DoS

  • Threat: High-Frequency UI Update DoS (Direct RxDataSources Involvement)

    • Description: An attacker exploits a vulnerability elsewhere in the application or its data source to cause a very high frequency of updates to be emitted on the Observable bound to RxDataSources. Even with RxDataSources' internal diffing, an extremely high rate can overwhelm the UI thread. This is a direct threat to RxDataSources because it's the component responsible for handling these updates and updating the UI.
    • Impact:
      • Application becomes unresponsive (UI freezes).
      • Application crashes due to excessive resource consumption on the main thread.
      • User experience is severely degraded.
    • Affected RxDataSources Component: The bind(to:) method (or similar binding methods) and the internal diffing algorithm within RxDataSources are directly affected. The diffing algorithm, while designed for efficiency, has limits.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Throttling/Debouncing (Pre-Binding): Use RxSwift operators like throttle or debounce before the bind(to:) call to RxDataSources. This is crucial to prevent the flood of updates from even reaching RxDataSources.
      • Distinct Until Changed (Pre-Binding): Use the distinctUntilChanged operator before binding, ensuring a correct Equatable implementation for your data models, to prevent unnecessary updates.
      • Rate Limiting at the Source (External): If possible, implement rate limiting at the data source (e.g., server-side API) – this is a defense-in-depth measure.
      • Background Processing (Pre-Binding): Perform data processing and filtering on a background thread, and only update the UI on the main thread using observe(on: MainScheduler.instance). This prevents heavy computation from blocking the UI thread before RxDataSources is even involved.
      • Error Handling (Within Binding Logic): While less direct, consider adding error handling within the binding logic (e.g., using catchError on the Observable) to detect and potentially mitigate extremely high update rates, perhaps by displaying an error or temporarily unsubscribing.

Threat: Uncontrolled Observable Modification Leading to UI Manipulation

  • Threat: Uncontrolled Observable Modification Leading to UI Manipulation (Indirect, but RxDataSources is the Display Vector)
    • Description: Although the root cause is external access to the Observable, RxDataSources is the mechanism through which the manipulated data is presented to the user. An attacker, having gained access to the Observable feeding RxDataSources, injects malicious data. RxDataSources then dutifully displays this data, potentially leading to security consequences. This is included because RxDataSources is the direct point of UI interaction.
    • Impact:
      • Display of incorrect/misleading information.
      • Triggering unintended actions if UI data influences application logic (e.g., incorrect prices, modified user roles).
      • Potential bypass of security checks if displayed data is used for authorization.
    • Affected RxDataSources Component: The bind(to:) method and the associated data binding mechanism are the direct components involved. RxDataSources is displaying whatever data it receives on the bound Observable.
    • Risk Severity: High (Potentially Critical if the data influences security-sensitive operations).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Access Control (External): The primary mitigation is to make the Subject/Relay driving the RxDataSources private or internal. This prevents external modification.
      • Immutable Data Models (Within Observable): Use immutable data models within the Observable stream. This makes modification more difficult.
      • Data Validation (Pre-Binding): Implement robust data validation before the data is emitted onto the Observable that is bound to RxDataSources.
      • Input Sanitization (External): If data originates from user input, sanitize it thoroughly before it enters the Observable stream.
      • Defensive Programming (Within Binding/Cell Configuration): Design the application and the cell configuration within RxDataSources to handle unexpected or invalid data gracefully.
      • Code Review (All Related Code): Thoroughly review the code related to the Observable, data models, and RxDataSources binding.

Threat: Data Model Exposure via Incorrect Binding

  • Threat: Data Model Exposure via Incorrect Binding (Direct RxDataSources Usage)

    • Description: The data models used with RxDataSources contain sensitive information. A programming error within the RxDataSources binding configuration (e.g., in the cellFactory or custom cell configuration within bind(to:)) causes this sensitive data to be directly displayed in the UI. This is a direct threat because it stems from how RxDataSources is used to configure the UI.
    • Impact:
      • Information disclosure (privacy violations, security breaches).
      • Exposure of credentials.
    • Affected RxDataSources Component: The cellFactory closure or the custom cell configuration code within the bind(to:) method (or equivalent binding methods) is the direct source of the vulnerability. This is where the mapping between data model properties and UI elements occurs.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Separate UI Models (Pre-Binding): Create separate data models specifically for UI presentation, containing only the necessary data. This is the most important mitigation.
      • Data Transformation (Pre-Binding): Use RxSwift operators (e.g., map, compactMap) before binding to RxDataSources to transform the original data models into the UI-specific models.
      • Data Masking/Redaction (Within Binding/Cell Configuration): If sensitive data must be partially displayed, implement masking/redaction within the cellFactory or custom cell configuration.
      • Code Review (Binding Configuration): Carefully review the UI binding code within the cellFactory or custom cell configuration. This is the most critical area to review.
      • UI Testing (Automated Verification): Use UI testing frameworks to automatically verify that sensitive data is not exposed in the UI.