Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
28 lines (23 loc) · 4.14 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

28 lines (23 loc) · 4.14 KB

Threat Model Analysis for snapkit/masonry

Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities

  • Description: An attacker could exploit known security vulnerabilities present in the underlying system frameworks (like Foundation, UIKit/AppKit) that Masonry relies upon. While Masonry itself might not have the vulnerability, its functionality depends on these frameworks. Exploitation is achieved by triggering application states that interact with the vulnerable framework components used by Masonry, potentially through crafted input or specific UI interactions.
  • Impact: Successful exploitation can lead to critical consequences including remote code execution, allowing the attacker to gain full control of the device; sensitive information disclosure, exposing user data or application secrets; and complete application compromise, leading to data manipulation or further attacks.
  • Masonry Component Affected: Indirectly affects the entire application using Masonry, as the vulnerability lies within the foundational frameworks Masonry depends on for its operation. Specifically, the runtime environment and system libraries utilized by Masonry.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Priority: Maintain up-to-date dependencies by regularly updating the development environment and SDKs to the latest stable versions provided by Apple. This includes Xcode and the target OS SDKs.
      • Proactively monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases specifically related to Apple's SDKs (Foundation, UIKit, AppKit) and Objective-C/Swift runtime environments.
      • Implement robust input validation and sanitization throughout the application to minimize the attack surface and prevent malicious input from reaching vulnerable framework components.
      • Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, focusing on interactions between the application, Masonry, and underlying system frameworks to identify potential vulnerabilities.

Threat: Logic Errors in Layout Calculation leading to UI Denial of Service

  • Description: An attacker could intentionally provide or manipulate data that, when processed by Masonry's layout engine, results in computationally expensive or infinite layout calculations. This can be achieved by crafting input that leads to extremely complex or recursive constraint resolution, overwhelming the device's CPU and memory resources.
  • Impact: This leads to a Denial of Service (DoS) condition on the user's device. The application becomes unresponsive, freezes, or crashes, rendering it unusable. This can disrupt critical application functionality and negatively impact user experience. In severe cases, it might require a device restart to recover.
  • Masonry Component Affected: Primarily affects Masonry's constraint solving engine and layout calculation logic. The vulnerability lies in the potential for unbounded computation when resolving complex or maliciously crafted constraint sets provided to Masonry's API.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Developers:
      • Implement robust input validation and sanitization for data that dynamically drives UI layout and constraint definitions to prevent injection of malicious or overly complex layout parameters.
      • Thoroughly test UI layouts under stress conditions with large and complex datasets, including edge cases and potentially malicious input patterns, to identify performance bottlenecks and resource exhaustion issues.
      • Optimize layout constraint logic for performance, avoiding overly complex or deeply nested constraint hierarchies. Consider using techniques like constraint priorities and simplifying layouts where possible.
      • Implement resource monitoring and potentially circuit-breaker patterns within the application to detect and mitigate runaway layout calculations before they lead to a full DoS. For example, setting timeouts for layout operations or limiting the complexity of dynamically generated layouts.