Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
105 lines (83 loc) · 9.04 KB

File metadata and controls

105 lines (83 loc) · 9.04 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for swiftgen/swiftgen

Objective: Execute Arbitrary Code via SwiftGen Exploit [CRITICAL]

Attack Tree Visualization

                                      +-------------------------------------------------+
                                      |  Execute Arbitrary Code via SwiftGen Exploit  | [CRITICAL]
                                      +-------------------------------------------------+
                                                     /                 \
                                                    /                   \
          +--------------------------------+                                   +--------------------------------+
          |  Template Manipulation Attack  |                                   |  Dependency Hijacking/Poisoning |
          |        (Stencils)    [CRITICAL]|                                   |        (of SwiftGen itself)     |
          +--------------------------------+                                   +--------------------------------+
              /           |           \                                           /           |           \
             /            |            \                                          /            |            \
+-----------+-----+ +-----+-----+ +-----+-----+                 +-----------+-----+ +-----+-----+ +-----+-----+
| Inject Malicious | | Modify  | |Host Mal.  |                 |  Compromise  | |  Publish  | |  Social  |
| Stencil Template| |Existing | |Stencil on |                 |  SwiftGen's  | | Malicious | |Engineer |
|    (Remote)    | |Template | |Public Repo|                 |  Repository  | |  Package  | |  Dev    |
+-----------+-----+ +-----+-----+ +-----+-----+                 +-----------+-----+ |  (e.g.,   | |  to    |
   [HIGH RISK]     [HIGH RISK]     [HIGH RISK]                                     |  CocoaPods,| |  Use   |
                                                                                    |  SPM, etc.)| |Malicious|
                                                                                    +-----------+-----+ | Package|
                                                                                             | +-----+-----+
                                                                                             |
                                                                                    +--------+-------+
                                                                                    |  Wait for    |
                                                                                    |  Developer  |
                                                                                    |  to Install |
                                                                                    +--------+-------+
  • Description: This is the ultimate objective of the attacker. Successful exploitation of any of the underlying vulnerabilities leads to this outcome.
  • Impact: Very High. Complete control over the developer's machine or the build process, potentially leading to compromise of the application, source code, credentials, and other sensitive data.
  • Description: This attack vector focuses on manipulating the Stencil templates used by SwiftGen to generate code. It's considered critical due to its versatility and the potential for high impact.
  • Impact: High. Successful template manipulation leads to arbitrary code execution.
  • Description: The attacker creates a malicious Stencil template and hosts it on a publicly accessible location (e.g., a GitHub repository, a compromised website). They then trick a developer into using this template, either through social engineering, by compromising a dependency that references the template, or by exploiting a vulnerability that allows them to inject the template's URL.
  • Likelihood: Medium. Developers often use third-party templates.
  • Impact: High. Arbitrary code execution.
  • Effort: Medium. Requires creating the template and finding a distribution method.
  • Skill Level: Medium. Requires Stencil knowledge and potentially social engineering skills.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium. Requires careful code review of the template.
  • Description: The attacker gains unauthorized access to the project's source code repository (e.g., through compromised credentials, a supply chain attack, or a vulnerability in the version control system) and modifies an existing Stencil template to include malicious code.
  • Likelihood: Low. Requires compromising the repository.
  • Impact: High. Arbitrary code execution.
  • Effort: High. Requires gaining unauthorized access.
  • Skill Level: High. Requires skills in compromising version control or exploiting vulnerabilities.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium to High. Depends on repository auditing and monitoring.
  • Description: Similar to injecting a remote template, but specifically focuses on hosting the malicious template on a seemingly legitimate public repository (like GitHub). The attacker relies on developers finding and using the template, potentially through misleading names or descriptions.
  • Likelihood: Medium. Developers may search for and use templates from public sources.
  • Impact: High. Arbitrary code execution.
  • Effort: Medium. Requires creating the template and hosting it.
  • Skill Level: Medium. Requires Stencil knowledge and potentially social engineering skills.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium. Requires careful code review and vetting of the template's source.
  • Description: This attack vector targets SwiftGen itself, aiming to compromise the tool before it's even used by the developer.
  • Description: The attacker gains control of the official SwiftGen repository (e.g., on GitHub) and modifies the source code to include malicious functionality. This is a low-likelihood, but extremely high-impact event.
  • Likelihood: Low. Requires compromising a well-secured repository.
  • Impact: Very High. Widespread compromise of all SwiftGen users.
  • Effort: Very High. Requires significant resources and expertise.
  • Skill Level: Very High. Advanced hacking skills, potentially insider access.
  • Detection Difficulty: High. Requires sophisticated monitoring and intrusion detection.
  • Description: The attacker publishes a malicious package to a package manager (e.g., CocoaPods, Swift Package Manager) that either impersonates SwiftGen (typosquatting) or is a legitimate-looking package that includes SwiftGen as a compromised dependency.
  • Likelihood: Medium. Typosquatting and dependency confusion attacks are increasingly common.
  • Impact: High. Arbitrary code execution on the developer's machine.
  • Effort: Medium. Requires creating and publishing the malicious package.
  • Skill Level: Medium. Requires knowledge of package management.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium. Requires careful verification of package names and authors.
  • Wait for Developer to Install: * Description: After publishing malicious package, attacker waits for developer to install it.
  • Description: The attacker uses social engineering techniques (e.g., phishing emails, fake blog posts, misleading documentation) to convince a developer to install a malicious package that compromises SwiftGen or includes it as a compromised dependency.
  • Likelihood: Medium. Depends on the attacker's social engineering skills.
  • Impact: High. Arbitrary code execution.
  • Effort: Medium. Requires crafting a convincing social engineering attack.
  • Skill Level: Medium. Requires strong social engineering skills.
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium. Relies on developer vigilance and awareness.