Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
90 lines (74 loc) · 8.25 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

90 lines (74 loc) · 8.25 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for flutter/engine

Objective: Gain unauthorized control over a Flutter application's execution or data by exploiting vulnerabilities in the Flutter Engine.

Attack Tree Visualization

Gain Unauthorized Control over Flutter App (via Engine)
├── 1.  Manipulate Rendering/Graphics Pipeline [HIGH RISK]
│   └── 1.1  Exploit Skia Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK]
│       ├── 1.1.1  Buffer Overflow in Skia Image Decoding (CVE-like) [CRITICAL]
│       └── 1.1.4  Logic Error in Skia's GPU Resource Management [CRITICAL]
├── 2.  Compromise Platform Channel Communication [HIGH RISK]
│   ├── 2.1  Exploit Binary Message Encoding/Decoding
│   │   ├── 2.1.1  Buffer Overflow in Message Decoding [CRITICAL]
│   │   └── 2.1.3  Deserialization Vulnerabilities (if custom codecs are used) [CRITICAL]
│   └── 2.2  Intercept or Modify Platform Channel Messages
│       └── 2.2.2  Hook Platform Channel Methods (e.g., using Frida) [CRITICAL]
└── 4.  Attack the Text Rendering Stack [HIGH RISK]
    └── 4.1  Exploit Font Parsing Libraries (e.g., HarfBuzz, FreeType)
        └── 4.1.1  Buffer Overflow in Font File Parsing [CRITICAL]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Manipulate Rendering/Graphics Pipeline [HIGH RISK]

  • 1.1 Exploit Skia Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK]

    • Description: Skia is the graphics library used by Flutter. Vulnerabilities in Skia can lead to severe consequences, including arbitrary code execution.

    • Attack Vectors:

      • 1.1.1 Buffer Overflow in Skia Image Decoding (CVE-like) [CRITICAL]

        • Description: A crafted malicious image (e.g., PNG, JPEG, WebP) is provided to the application. The image contains specially designed data that, when processed by Skia's image decoding routines, causes a buffer overflow. This overflow overwrites adjacent memory, potentially allowing the attacker to inject and execute arbitrary code.
        • Likelihood: Low (Skia is heavily scrutinized, but new vulnerabilities can emerge)
        • Impact: High (Potential for arbitrary code execution)
        • Effort: High (Requires finding a 0-day or exploiting a recently patched vulnerability)
        • Skill Level: Expert (Deep understanding of image codecs and memory corruption)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Can be detected by fuzzing, static analysis, and runtime memory protection, but sophisticated exploits might bypass some defenses)

      • 1.1.4 Logic Error in Skia's GPU Resource Management [CRITICAL]

        • Description: The attacker triggers specific sequences of GPU resource allocation and deallocation operations. A logic error in Skia's resource management could lead to use-after-free conditions, double-frees, or other memory corruption issues. This could be exploited to gain control of the GPU and potentially execute arbitrary code.
        • Likelihood: Low (Complex area, but heavily tested)
        • Impact: High (Could lead to crashes, memory corruption, or potentially GPU-level compromise)
        • Effort: High (Requires deep understanding of GPU resource management)
        • Skill Level: Advanced (Expertise in GPU programming and vulnerability research)
        • Detection Difficulty: Hard (Requires specialized tools and deep analysis)

Attack Tree Path: 2. Compromise Platform Channel Communication [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: Platform channels are the mechanism for Flutter code to communicate with native (Android/iOS/etc.) code. Vulnerabilities here can allow attackers to intercept data, inject malicious commands, or execute code on either the Flutter or native side.

  • Attack Vectors:

    • 2.1 Exploit Binary Message Encoding/Decoding

      • 2.1.1 Buffer Overflow in Message Decoding [CRITICAL]

        • Description: The attacker sends a malformed message through a platform channel. The message is intentionally oversized or contains invalid data that, when processed by the message decoding logic (either on the Dart side or the native side), causes a buffer overflow. This allows the attacker to overwrite memory and potentially execute arbitrary code.
        • Likelihood: Low (Flutter's standard message codecs are well-tested, but custom codecs are a risk)
        • Impact: High (Potential for arbitrary code execution on either the Dart or native side)
        • Effort: Medium to High (Depends on the complexity of the codec)
        • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced (Understanding of binary data formats and memory corruption)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Can be detected by fuzzing and static analysis)

      • 2.1.3 Deserialization Vulnerabilities (if custom codecs are used) [CRITICAL]

        • Description: If the application uses custom serialization/deserialization logic for platform channel messages (instead of Flutter's built-in codecs), it's highly susceptible to deserialization vulnerabilities. The attacker crafts a malicious serialized object that, when deserialized, triggers unintended code execution. This is a classic and very dangerous vulnerability type.
        • Likelihood: Medium (Custom codecs are a common source of vulnerabilities)
        • Impact: High (Potential for arbitrary code execution)
        • Effort: Medium (If the attacker can find a known deserialization vulnerability pattern)
        • Skill Level: Intermediate to Advanced (Understanding of deserialization vulnerabilities)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Can be detected by static analysis and security audits)

    • 2.2 Intercept or Modify Platform Channel Messages

      • 2.2.2 Hook Platform Channel Methods (e.g., using Frida) [CRITICAL]
        • Description: The attacker uses a dynamic instrumentation tool like Frida to hook into the platform channel methods. This allows them to intercept messages sent between the Dart and native code, modify the message contents, or even inject new messages. This can be used to steal sensitive data, manipulate application behavior, or potentially escalate privileges.
        • Likelihood: Medium (Requires device access or a compromised app)
        • Impact: High (Could intercept sensitive data or inject malicious commands)
        • Effort: Low to Medium (Frida is a powerful tool, but requires some setup)
        • Skill Level: Intermediate (Understanding of dynamic instrumentation)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium to Hard (Can be detected by anti-tampering techniques, but sophisticated attackers might bypass them)

Attack Tree Path: 4. Attack the Text Rendering Stack [HIGH RISK]

  • Description: Flutter uses external libraries (like HarfBuzz and FreeType) for font parsing and rendering. Vulnerabilities in these libraries can be exploited by providing malicious font files.

  • Attack Vectors:

    • 4.1 Exploit Font Parsing Libraries (e.g., HarfBuzz, FreeType)
      • 4.1.1 Buffer Overflow in Font File Parsing [CRITICAL]
        • Description: The attacker provides a specially crafted malicious font file (e.g., TTF, OTF) to the application. When the font parsing library attempts to process this file, a buffer overflow occurs due to incorrect handling of the font data. This allows the attacker to overwrite memory and potentially execute arbitrary code.
        • Likelihood: Low (These libraries are heavily scrutinized, but new vulnerabilities can emerge)
        • Impact: High (Potential for arbitrary code execution)
        • Effort: High (Requires finding a 0-day or exploiting a recently patched vulnerability)
        • Skill Level: Expert (Deep understanding of font file formats and memory corruption)
        • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Can be detected by fuzzing, static analysis, and runtime memory protection)