Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
152 lines (119 loc) · 16.2 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

152 lines (119 loc) · 16.2 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis of the Gorilla WebSocket library based on the provided design document.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: The primary objective is to conduct a thorough security analysis of the Gorilla WebSocket library (github.com/gorilla/websocket), focusing on its core components, data flow, and interactions within a typical application deployment. This analysis aims to identify potential vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies. We will pay particular attention to how the library itself handles security concerns, and how it enables developers to build secure applications. We will not focus on general web application security best practices, except where they directly intersect with WebSocket usage.

  • Scope: The scope of this analysis includes:

    • The core gorilla/websocket package, including connection establishment, message handling (reading and writing), error handling, and closure.
    • The interaction of the library with the Go standard library's net/http package, particularly regarding connection upgrading and TLS.
    • The documented features and options provided by the library, as described in the README and official documentation.
    • Common deployment scenarios, as outlined in the design document (standalone, Docker/Kubernetes, serverless).
    • The build process security controls.

    The scope excludes:

    • Application-specific logic built on top of Gorilla WebSocket. We assume developers are responsible for securing their own application code.
    • Vulnerabilities in the underlying operating system, network infrastructure, or third-party libraries other than net/http and TLS.
    • In-depth analysis of the Go runtime itself.

  • Methodology:

    1. Code Review (Inferred): While we don't have direct access to modify the Gorilla WebSocket codebase, we will analyze its documented behavior and publicly available source code (through the GitHub link) to understand its internal workings. This is a "gray-box" approach.
    2. Design Document Review: We will critically analyze the provided design document, identifying potential security gaps and inconsistencies.
    3. Threat Modeling: We will use a threat modeling approach, considering common attack vectors against WebSocket applications and how Gorilla WebSocket mitigates (or fails to mitigate) them.
    4. Best Practices Comparison: We will compare the library's features and recommended usage against established WebSocket security best practices.
    5. Documentation Analysis: We will examine the official documentation for security-relevant guidance and potential areas for improvement.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of key components, inferred from the codebase and documentation:

  • Connection Upgrade (Upgrader.Upgrade()):

    • Component: This function handles the HTTP handshake that upgrades a standard HTTP connection to a WebSocket connection. It's the entry point for all WebSocket connections.
    • Security Implications:
      • Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS): The Upgrader has a CheckOrigin field, which is a function that determines whether to accept a connection from a given origin. This is crucial for preventing Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) attacks. The default behavior (if CheckOrigin is nil) is to accept all origins, which is insecure. The design document correctly identifies CORS handling as an existing control, but it's vital that developers always provide a custom CheckOrigin function.
      • HTTP Header Validation: The Upgrade() function should validate the incoming HTTP headers (e.g., Sec-WebSocket-Key, Sec-WebSocket-Version) to ensure they conform to the WebSocket protocol (RFC 6455). Failure to do so could lead to protocol-level attacks. The library does perform these checks.
      • Subprotocol Negotiation: The Sec-WebSocket-Protocol header allows clients and servers to negotiate a subprotocol. The Upgrader allows specifying supported subprotocols. If not handled carefully, this could lead to vulnerabilities if the application logic doesn't properly validate the chosen subprotocol.
      • Extension Negotiation: Similar to subprotocols, the Sec-WebSocket-Extensions header allows for negotiating extensions. The library supports extensions, and developers must ensure that any used extensions are handled securely.

  • Connection Handling (Conn):

    • Component: The Conn type represents an established WebSocket connection. It provides methods for reading and writing messages, setting deadlines, and closing the connection.
    • Security Implications:
      • Read/Write Deadlines: The SetReadDeadline() and SetWriteDeadline() methods are essential for mitigating Slowloris-type attacks, where a malicious client sends data very slowly to tie up server resources. The design document correctly identifies this as an existing control. Developers must use these deadlines appropriately.
      • Message Size Limits: The Conn allows setting a maximum message size (SetReadLimit()). This is critical for preventing denial-of-service attacks where a malicious client sends extremely large messages to consume server memory. The design document should explicitly mention this.
      • Ping/Pong Handling: The WebSocket protocol includes ping and pong frames for keep-alive and connection health checks. The Conn provides methods for sending pings and handling pongs (SetPingHandler(), SetPongHandler(), WriteMessage(websocket.PingMessage, ...), WriteMessage(websocket.PongMessage, ...)). Proper use of pings and pongs can help detect and close dead connections, improving resilience.
      • Close Handling: The Close() method and the SetCloseHandler() allow for graceful connection closure. Properly handling close messages is important for preventing resource leaks and ensuring clean disconnection. The library handles the WebSocket close handshake (status codes, etc.).
      • Concurrency: The documentation explicitly states that Conn methods should not be called concurrently, except for Close(), WriteControl(), SetReadDeadline(), and SetWriteDeadline(). Incorrect concurrent access could lead to race conditions and unpredictable behavior. This is a developer responsibility to manage correctly.

  • Message Reading (Conn.ReadMessage()):

    • Component: This function reads the next WebSocket message from the connection.
    • Security Implications:
      • UTF-8 Validation: The library correctly validates UTF-8 in text messages, as mentioned in the design document. This helps prevent certain types of injection attacks.
      • Message Type Handling: The ReadMessage() function returns the message type (text, binary, close, ping, pong). The application logic must handle each message type appropriately. For example, unexpected message types could indicate an attack.
      • Fragmentation: WebSocket messages can be fragmented. The library handles reassembling fragmented messages, but the application should be aware of this possibility and handle potentially large messages appropriately (especially in conjunction with SetReadLimit()).

  • Message Writing (Conn.WriteMessage()):

    • Component: This function writes a WebSocket message to the connection.
    • Security Implications:
      • Message Type: The application must choose the correct message type (text or binary) based on the data being sent.
      • Fragmentation: The library allows sending fragmented messages. While this can be useful for large messages, it also introduces complexity that the application must handle correctly.

  • TLS Handling:

    • Component: The library relies on the Go standard library's net/http and crypto/tls packages for TLS support.
    • Security Implications:
      • Secure by Default (Potentially): If the WebSocket connection is established over an https:// URL, TLS is automatically used. However, it's possible to use ws:// (unencrypted) connections, which are highly insecure. The design document must strongly emphasize the use of wss:// (TLS-secured) connections.
      • Certificate Validation: The Go standard library performs certificate validation by default. However, it's possible to disable this (e.g., using InsecureSkipVerify in a custom tls.Config), which is extremely dangerous. The design document should explicitly warn against this.
      • Cipher Suite Configuration: The Go standard library uses a reasonable set of default cipher suites, but it's possible to customize this. Developers should ensure they use strong, modern cipher suites.

3. Architecture, Components, and Data Flow (Inferred)

The inferred architecture, components, and data flow are well-represented by the C4 diagrams in the design document. However, we can add some security-specific details:

  • Data Flow:

    1. Client initiates an HTTP request to the server (e.g., GET /ws).
    2. Server (using Gorilla WebSocket's Upgrader) checks the origin (CORS) and validates the WebSocket handshake headers.
    3. If the handshake is successful, the connection is upgraded to a WebSocket connection. A gorilla/websocket.Conn object is created.
    4. Client and server exchange WebSocket messages (text, binary, control frames). The Conn object handles framing, fragmentation, and UTF-8 validation.
    5. Either the client or server can initiate a close handshake. The Conn object handles the close handshake.

  • Key Security Components:

    • Upgrader: Handles the initial handshake, CORS checks, and subprotocol/extension negotiation.
    • Conn: Manages the established WebSocket connection, including read/write operations, deadlines, and close handling.
    • net/http: Provides the underlying HTTP and TLS functionality.
    • crypto/tls: Provides TLS encryption and certificate validation.

4. Tailored Security Considerations

Based on the analysis, here are specific security considerations for applications using Gorilla WebSocket:

  • Mandatory Custom CheckOrigin: Never rely on the default CheckOrigin behavior (which accepts all origins). Always implement a custom CheckOrigin function that explicitly allows only trusted origins. This is the single most important defense against CSWSH.
  • Strict Message Size Limits: Always use SetReadLimit() on the Conn to enforce a reasonable maximum message size. This is crucial for preventing denial-of-service attacks. The specific limit should be determined based on the application's expected message sizes.
  • Mandatory Read/Write Deadlines: Always use SetReadDeadline() and SetWriteDeadline() to prevent Slowloris attacks. The deadlines should be chosen based on the application's expected latency and network conditions.
  • wss:// Only: Never use ws:// (unencrypted) connections in production. Always use wss:// to ensure TLS encryption.
  • Validate Subprotocols and Extensions: If using subprotocols or extensions, carefully validate the negotiated values on both the client and server sides.
  • Handle All Message Types: Ensure the application logic correctly handles all possible WebSocket message types (text, binary, close, ping, pong), including unexpected types.
  • Avoid InsecureSkipVerify: Never disable TLS certificate validation (e.g., using InsecureSkipVerify in a custom tls.Config) unless absolutely necessary (e.g., in a controlled testing environment).
  • Review Cipher Suites: If customizing the TLS configuration, ensure that only strong, modern cipher suites are used.
  • Concurrency Awareness: Strictly adhere to the Conn concurrency rules. Only call Close(), WriteControl(), SetReadDeadline(), and SetWriteDeadline() concurrently.
  • Input Validation (Application-Level): While Gorilla WebSocket handles protocol-level validation, the application must validate the content of WebSocket messages to prevent application-specific vulnerabilities (e.g., XSS, SQL injection, command injection). This is outside the scope of the library itself, but crucial for overall security.
  • Authentication and Authorization (Application-Level): Implement robust authentication and authorization mechanisms before establishing the WebSocket connection. Gorilla WebSocket does not provide these features. Common approaches include using cookies, tokens, or other standard HTTP authentication methods.
  • Rate Limiting (Application-Level): Implement rate limiting to prevent abuse and denial-of-service attacks. This could be done at the application level or using a reverse proxy or API gateway.
  • Connection Limiting (Application-Level/Infrastructure): Limit the number of concurrent WebSocket connections to prevent resource exhaustion. This can be done at the application level, using a load balancer, or through Kubernetes resource limits.

5. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

Here are actionable mitigation strategies, categorized by the threats they address:

  • Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH):

    • Mitigation: Mandatory custom CheckOrigin function in the Upgrader. This is the primary defense.

  • Denial-of-Service (DoS):

    • Mitigation:
      • SetReadLimit() on the Conn to limit message sizes.
      • SetReadDeadline() and SetWriteDeadline() on the Conn to mitigate Slowloris attacks.
      • Application-level rate limiting and connection limiting.
      • Infrastructure-level protections (e.g., load balancers, firewalls).

  • Protocol-Level Attacks:

    • Mitigation: Rely on Gorilla WebSocket's built-in validation of WebSocket handshake headers and UTF-8 encoding. Ensure the library is kept up-to-date to receive any security patches related to protocol handling.

  • Data Breaches (Confidentiality):

    • Mitigation:
      • Mandatory use of wss:// (TLS) for all connections.
      • Proper certificate validation (avoid InsecureSkipVerify).
      • Strong cipher suite configuration.
      • Application-level encryption of sensitive data within WebSocket messages, if necessary.

  • Injection Attacks (XSS, SQLi, etc.):

    • Mitigation: Thorough input validation of the content of WebSocket messages at the application level. This is not handled by the library itself.

  • Authentication/Authorization Bypass:

    • Mitigation: Implement robust authentication and authorization before the WebSocket connection is established (typically during the initial HTTP handshake).

  • Build Process Vulnerabilities:

    • Mitigation:
      • Use of signed commits.
      • Use minimal base image for container.
      • Use SAST tool.
      • Use CI/CD system.

Summary and Recommendations

The Gorilla WebSocket library provides a solid foundation for building secure WebSocket applications in Go. It includes several important security features, such as CORS handling, read/write deadlines, UTF-8 validation, and TLS support. However, it's crucial that developers understand how to use these features correctly and implement additional application-level security measures.

The most critical recommendations are:

  1. Always use a custom CheckOrigin function.
  2. Always set read/write deadlines and message size limits.
  3. Always use wss:// (TLS) connections.
  4. Implement robust application-level input validation, authentication, and authorization.
  5. Keep the library and its dependencies up-to-date.
  6. Implement robust build process.

By following these recommendations, developers can significantly reduce the risk of security vulnerabilities in their WebSocket applications built with Gorilla WebSocket. The provided design document is a good starting point, but it should be updated to explicitly emphasize the mandatory nature of some of these security controls (especially CheckOrigin and wss://). The document should also explicitly mention the importance of SetReadLimit().