Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
94 lines (81 loc) · 9.9 KB

File metadata and controls

94 lines (81 loc) · 9.9 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for hackiftekhar/iqkeyboardmanager

Objective: Gain unauthorized access, cause denial of service, manipulate application behavior, or exfiltrate sensitive information by exploiting weaknesses related to IQKeyboardManager.

Attack Tree Visualization

High-Risk Sub-Tree:

  • Attack Goal: Compromise Application using IQKeyboardManager
    • [AND] Exploit Weaknesses in IQKeyboardManager Integration/Behavior
      • [OR] 1. Exploit Logic Bugs in IQKeyboardManager [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
        • [OR] 1.1. Cause Incorrect View Adjustment [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • [AND] 1.1.1. Trigger Edge Case in View Calculation
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.1.1.a. Craft UI with complex layouts, nested views, or dynamic elements that might confuse IQKeyboardManager's view hierarchy calculations.
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.1.1.b. Test application with various screen sizes, orientations, and keyboard types to identify layout inconsistencies caused by IQKeyboardManager. (Preventative Action)
          • [AND] 1.1.2. Manipulate View Hierarchy at Runtime
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.1.2.a. Dynamically add or remove views, especially input fields, after IQKeyboardManager has initialized, potentially disrupting its tracking and adjustment logic.
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.1.2.b. Use UI testing frameworks to simulate rapid UI changes and observe if IQKeyboardManager handles them gracefully or introduces vulnerabilities. (Preventative Action)
        • [OR] 1.2. Trigger Resource Exhaustion [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • [AND] 1.2.1. Cause Infinite Loop or Excessive Calculations
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.2.1.a. Explore scenarios where rapid keyboard appearance/disappearance events, combined with complex UI, might lead to inefficient algorithms within IQKeyboardManager causing CPU spikes or memory leaks.
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.2.1.b. Monitor application performance (CPU, memory) during intensive keyboard interactions, especially in resource-constrained devices. (Preventative Action)
          • [AND] 1.2.2. Exploit Memory Leaks
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.2.2.a. Repeatedly trigger keyboard events and UI interactions while monitoring memory usage to identify potential memory leaks within IQKeyboardManager's lifecycle management.
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.2.2.b. Use memory profiling tools to analyze heap dumps and identify if IQKeyboardManager is contributing to memory leaks over prolonged usage. (Preventative Action)
        • [OR] 1.3. Exploit State Management Issues [CRITICAL NODE, HIGH-RISK PATH]
          • [AND] 1.3.1. Cause State Confusion in Keyboard Tracking
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.3.1.a. Rapidly switch between different input fields, especially those in different parts of the UI hierarchy, to see if IQKeyboardManager loses track of the active text field or its state.
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.3.1.b. Test scenarios involving modal views, popovers, or custom keyboard handling alongside IQKeyboardManager to identify potential conflicts in state management. (Preventative Action)
          • [AND] 1.3.2. Bypass Keyboard Dismissal Logic
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.3.2.a. Attempt to programmatically dismiss the keyboard using methods outside of IQKeyboardManager's control and observe if this leads to unexpected UI states or vulnerabilities.
            • [Actionable Insight] 1.3.2.b. Explore if custom gesture recognizers or UI interactions can interfere with IQKeyboardManager's keyboard dismissal mechanisms, potentially leaving the keyboard visible when it shouldn't be. (Preventative Action)
  • Attack Vector: Attackers focus on finding flaws in the core logic of IQKeyboardManager related to view management, calculations, and state tracking. These bugs are exploited through specific UI interactions or by crafting particular UI structures that expose weaknesses in the library's algorithms.
  • Potential Impact: Primarily UI-related issues, but can extend to resource exhaustion and potentially minor information disclosure if UI elements are displaced in unintended ways, revealing underlying content.
  • Attack Vector 1.1.1. Trigger Edge Case in View Calculation:
    • How Attacker Exploits: An attacker crafts a complex UI layout within the application. This layout might include:
      • Deeply nested views.
      • Dynamically added or removed UI elements.
      • Custom view hierarchies.
      • Overlapping or unusual positioning of input fields.
    • The attacker then interacts with input fields within this complex UI, aiming to trigger edge cases in IQKeyboardManager's view hierarchy calculations. This could lead to:
      • Input fields being obscured by the keyboard.
      • Content being pushed off-screen.
      • UI elements overlapping incorrectly.
      • Unexpected scrolling behavior.
  • Attack Vector 1.1.2. Manipulate View Hierarchy at Runtime:
    • How Attacker Exploits: An attacker interacts with the application in a way that dynamically changes the UI hierarchy after IQKeyboardManager has initialized and started managing the views. This could involve:
      • Navigating through different screens or views that load UI elements asynchronously.
      • Triggering application features that dynamically add or remove input fields or their parent views.
      • Using application features that modify the view hierarchy based on user actions or data updates.
    • By manipulating the view hierarchy at runtime, the attacker attempts to disrupt IQKeyboardManager's assumptions about the UI structure, leading to incorrect view adjustments and UI glitches similar to those in 1.1.1.
  • Attack Vector 1.2.1. Cause Infinite Loop or Excessive Calculations:
    • How Attacker Exploits: An attacker attempts to create a scenario that forces IQKeyboardManager to perform inefficient or repetitive calculations, potentially leading to a denial-of-service condition. This could involve:
      • Rapidly showing and hiding the keyboard repeatedly.
      • Quickly switching between multiple input fields in a complex UI.
      • Triggering UI animations or transitions concurrently with keyboard events.
      • Interacting with UI elements that cause frequent layout recalculations while the keyboard is active.
    • The goal is to overload the device's CPU or memory by exploiting inefficient algorithms within IQKeyboardManager, causing the application to become unresponsive, drain battery quickly, or potentially crash.
  • Attack Vector 1.2.2. Exploit Memory Leaks:
    • How Attacker Exploits: An attacker performs actions within the application that repeatedly trigger keyboard events and UI interactions over a prolonged period. The aim is to identify and exploit potential memory leaks within IQKeyboardManager's lifecycle management.
    • By repeatedly performing these actions, the attacker hopes to gradually consume device memory, leading to:
      • Performance degradation over time.
      • Eventually, application crashes due to memory exhaustion.
    • This attack is more of a long-term denial-of-service, gradually degrading the user experience.
  • Attack Vector 1.3.1. Cause State Confusion in Keyboard Tracking:
    • How Attacker Exploits: An attacker attempts to confuse IQKeyboardManager's internal state tracking of the active text field and keyboard status. This could be achieved by:
      • Rapidly switching focus between different input fields, especially those in different parts of the UI (e.g., in different scroll views or modal views).
      • Interacting with input fields in quick succession before IQKeyboardManager has fully processed previous keyboard events.
      • Using custom UI components or modal views that might interfere with IQKeyboardManager's view hierarchy traversal and focus detection.
    • State confusion can lead to:
      • IQKeyboardManager failing to adjust the view correctly for the currently active input field.
      • Incorrect keyboard dismissal behavior.
      • Unexpected UI states where the keyboard is visible or hidden at the wrong times.
  • Attack Vector 1.3.2. Bypass Keyboard Dismissal Logic:
    • How Attacker Exploits: An attacker tries to dismiss the keyboard using methods outside of IQKeyboardManager's intended control flow. This could involve:
      • Programmatically dismissing the keyboard using standard iOS/Android keyboard dismissal methods that IQKeyboardManager might not intercept or handle correctly in all scenarios.
      • Using custom gesture recognizers or UI interactions that trigger keyboard dismissal events in a way that bypasses IQKeyboardManager's logic.
      • Exploiting edge cases in UI transitions or animations that might interrupt or interfere with IQKeyboardManager's keyboard dismissal mechanisms.
    • Successfully bypassing the dismissal logic could result in:
      • The keyboard remaining visible when it should be dismissed, obscuring content.
      • UI inconsistencies and unexpected behavior related to keyboard visibility and view adjustments.