Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
119 lines (94 loc) · 9.34 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

119 lines (94 loc) · 9.34 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for rxswiftcommunity/rxalamofire

Mitigation Strategy: DisposeBag and Weak/Unowned References

  • Description:

    1. Identify RxAlamofire Observables: Locate all instances where RxAlamofire is used to create Observable sequences for network requests (e.g., request(...).responseJSON()).
    2. Create DisposeBag: In each class or scope using RxAlamofire Observables, create a private let disposeBag = DisposeBag() property.
    3. Add Subscriptions: Every time you subscribe to an RxAlamofire Observable, immediately add the resulting Disposable to the disposeBag using .disposed(by: disposeBag).
    4. Use Weak/Unowned: Within the closures passed to subscribe (or operators like map, flatMap), use [weak self] to create a weak reference to self. Inside the closure, use guard let self = self else { return } to safely unwrap. Use [unowned self] only if you are absolutely certain the closure will never execute after self is deallocated; weak self is generally safer.
    5. Deallocation Check (Optional): Add a print statement to the deinit method of your classes to confirm deallocation.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Memory Leaks (High Severity): Prevents RxAlamofire-related objects from being retained in memory due to strong reference cycles within the reactive chain.
    • Retain Cycles (High Severity): Addresses circular dependencies specifically caused by improper subscription management in RxAlamofire.
    • Unexpected Behavior (Medium Severity): Avoids callbacks from RxAlamofire being executed on deallocated objects.

  • Impact:

    • Memory Leaks: Risk significantly reduced (near elimination with correct implementation).
    • Retain Cycles: Risk significantly reduced (near elimination with correct implementation).
    • Unexpected Behavior: Risk significantly reduced, preventing callbacks on deallocated instances.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: NetworkManager uses DisposeBag and [weak self] in all RxAlamofire request callbacks.
    • Example: UserProfileViewModel uses DisposeBag and checks for self being nil after weak self.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: ImageDownloader class inconsistently uses DisposeBag with RxAlamofire calls.
    • Example: Utility functions creating RxAlamofire Observables are missing DisposeBag usage.

Mitigation Strategy: Explicit Thread Management with RxAlamofire

  • Description:

    1. Identify UI/Background Operations: Determine which parts of your RxAlamofire code interact with the UI or perform long-running operations.
    2. observeOn(MainScheduler.instance): For any code that updates the UI after an RxAlamofire request completes, use .observeOn(MainScheduler.instance) before the subscribe call. This ensures UI updates are on the main thread.
    3. subscribeOn: Use .subscribeOn to specify the scheduler for initiating the RxAlamofire request itself. Use a background scheduler (e.g., ConcurrentDispatchQueueScheduler(qos: .background)) to avoid blocking the main thread during the network operation.
    4. Avoid Implicit Threading: Be aware that RxAlamofire, through Alamofire and RxSwift, might have default threading behaviors. Understand these defaults.
    5. Testing: Thoroughly test asynchronous RxAlamofire code, including edge cases, to ensure correct threading.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • UI Freezes (High Severity): Prevents RxAlamofire network operations from blocking the main thread.
    • Data Corruption (High Severity): Avoids race conditions when multiple threads (managed by RxAlamofire/RxSwift) access shared data.
    • Crashes (High Severity): Prevents crashes from UI updates on background threads after RxAlamofire requests.

  • Impact:

    • UI Freezes: Risk significantly reduced (eliminated with correct dispatching).
    • Data Corruption: Risk significantly reduced by enforcing controlled access.
    • Crashes: Risk significantly reduced by preventing illegal UI updates.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: UI updates in ViewController classes after RxAlamofire calls use .observeOn(MainScheduler.instance).
    • Example: RxAlamofire requests in NetworkService use .subscribeOn for a background scheduler.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: Helper functions processing RxAlamofire responses don't specify schedulers, leading to potential issues.
    • Example: Complex RxAlamofire Observable chains lack explicit observeOn calls, making thread execution unclear.

Mitigation Strategy: Robust Error Handling in RxAlamofire Chains

  • Description:

    1. Identify RxAlamofire Error Points: Determine where errors can occur within your RxAlamofire requests (network errors, parsing errors, etc.).
    2. catchError / catchErrorJustReturn: Use these operators specifically on the Observables returned by RxAlamofire.
      • catchError: Intercept the error and potentially return a new Observable.
      • catchErrorJustReturn: Intercept the error and return a default value.
    3. retry (with Backoff): For transient RxAlamofire network errors, use retry with an exponential backoff strategy.
    4. Centralized RxAlamofire Error Handling: Create a mechanism (class or function) to handle errors from RxAlamofire:
      • Log errors (with timestamps, error codes, stack traces).
      • Display user-friendly messages.
      • Trigger recovery actions (retry, prompt for network check).
    5. Don't Swallow Errors: Ensure all RxAlamofire errors are handled or propagated.
    6. Test RxAlamofire Error Scenarios: Write tests for RxAlamofire error handling, including timeouts, server errors, and invalid data.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unhandled RxAlamofire Exceptions (High Severity): Prevents unhandled errors from RxAlamofire requests from crashing the application.
    • Unexpected Application State (Medium Severity): Ensures consistent state even when RxAlamofire requests fail.
    • Poor User Experience (Medium Severity): Provides informative error messages and recovery options for RxAlamofire failures.
    • Data Loss (Medium Severity): Proper RxAlamofire error handling can prevent data loss through retries or alternatives.

  • Impact:

    • Unhandled Exceptions: Risk significantly reduced (near elimination with complete handling).
    • Unexpected Application State: Risk significantly reduced by providing recovery mechanisms.
    • Poor User Experience: Risk significantly reduced with informative messages.
    • Data Loss: Risk reduced, especially with retry strategies.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: NetworkManager has handleNetworkError for RxAlamofire errors, logging and displaying alerts.
    • Example: DataParser uses catchErrorJustReturn for RxAlamofire parsing failures.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: Some RxAlamofire requests lack catchError handlers.
    • Example: The centralized RxAlamofire error handling isn't consistently used.
    • Example: RxAlamofire error handling tests are incomplete.

Mitigation Strategy: Evaluate Reactive Complexity of RxAlamofire Usage

  • Description:

    1. Assess Simplicity: Before using RxAlamofire, consider if plain Alamofire with callbacks would be sufficient. Don't use RxAlamofire just for the sake of it.
    2. Code Reviews: Conduct reviews focusing on the complexity of RxAlamofire code. Is the reactive flow understandable?
    3. Documentation: Clearly document RxAlamofire-based code, explaining the purpose of each Observable and the data flow.
    4. Debugging Tools: Use RxSwift debugging tools (debug operator, RxSwift.Resources.total) to trace RxAlamofire Observable sequences.
    5. Refactoring: If RxAlamofire code becomes too complex, refactor it for simplicity or consider a non-reactive alternative.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Code Maintainability Issues (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of overly complex RxAlamofire code.
    • Increased Bug Introduction (Medium Severity): Simpler RxAlamofire usage is less prone to bugs.
    • Onboarding Difficulty (Low Severity): Easier for new developers to understand RxAlamofire code if it's not overly complex.

  • Impact:

    • Code Maintainability Issues: Risk reduced by promoting simpler RxAlamofire usage.
    • Increased Bug Introduction: Risk reduced by minimizing RxAlamofire complexity.
    • Onboarding Difficulty: Risk reduced by making RxAlamofire code more accessible.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Example: Code reviews assess the complexity of RxAlamofire usage.
    • Example: Documentation guidelines encourage clear explanations of RxAlamofire Observables.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Example: Some parts use RxAlamofire unnecessarily for simple requests.
    • Example: RxSwift debugging tools are not consistently used with RxAlamofire.