Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Indicators of objectivity #71

Open
loleg opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Indicators of objectivity #71

loleg opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@loleg
Copy link
Member

loleg commented Aug 23, 2021 •
edited
Loading

There are a number of objective attributes that are involved in the nomination and evaluation of a project for a DINAcon award. Things like GitHub stars, # of contributors, estimates of # installations or users, and potentially hundreds of other performance indicators. Whatever the jury depends on for their decision, it would be worth making it more transparently shown in the results - and clearly documented as part of the Awards set-up.
@loleg loleg changed the title Refocus on objectivity Indicators of objectivity Aug 23, 2021
@loleg loleg mentioned this issue Aug 23, 2021
Open
@loleg
Copy link
Member Author

loleg commented Jul 17, 2023

It is also quite important to document this accurately for historical purposes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@loleg