Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency @vercel/style-guide to v6 #369

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stage
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 11, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@vercel/style-guide 5.2.0 -> 6.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

vercel/style-guide (@​vercel/style-guide)

v6.0.0

Compare Source

Features
BREAKING CHANGES
  • deps: Node 18.18 is now the minimum required version.
  • eslint: Contains changes to @typescript-eslint/* enabled rules and configuration.
  • eslint: Enabled rules for eslint-plugin-playwright have changed.
  • eslint: no-await-in-loop has been removed.
  • eslint: no-return-await is deprecated and has been removed.
  • eslint: jest/require-top-level-describe has been removed.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vercel-style-guide-6.x branch 2 times, most recently from 49e6a46 to cc0459c Compare July 15, 2024 19:11
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vercel-style-guide-6.x branch from cc0459c to 5fe1e0e Compare July 16, 2024 08:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants