Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better naming in UTA database module #245

Open
korikuzma opened this issue Dec 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Better naming in UTA database module #245

korikuzma opened this issue Dec 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
priority:low Low priority technical debt A feature/requirement implemented in a sub-optimal way & must be re-written. Contrast to "cleanup"

Comments

@korikuzma
Copy link
Member

We should use better method and variable names in the UTA database module

@korikuzma korikuzma added priority:low Low priority technical debt A feature/requirement implemented in a sub-optimal way & must be re-written. Contrast to "cleanup" labels Dec 27, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 3, 2024

This issue is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Please make a comment for triaging or closing the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority:low Low priority technical debt A feature/requirement implemented in a sub-optimal way & must be re-written. Contrast to "cleanup"
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant