Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: DIA-1926: return annots/preds in sample data #7178

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pakelley
Copy link
Contributor

@pakelley pakelley commented Mar 7, 2025

This PR was automatically generated via Follow Merge. Workflow Run
Please ensure that all linked upstream Pull Requests are merged before proceeding with this one.


Adds sample annotations/predictions to sample task, when it can.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the feat label Mar 7, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5d1adb8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/67cb9897e646c60008255081

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5d1adb8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/heartex-docs/deploys/67cb9897185d1200080a8a9a

@pakelley pakelley requested a review from matt-bernstein March 7, 2025 01:11
@pakelley pakelley changed the title feat: return annots/preds in sample data feat: DIA-1926: return annots/preds in sample data Mar 7, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.30%. Comparing base (4108f9e) to head (5d1adb8).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #7178      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    77.20%   77.30%   +0.09%     
===========================================
  Files          187      188       +1     
  Lines        14484    14549      +65     
===========================================
+ Hits         11183    11247      +64     
- Misses        3301     3302       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 77.30% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@matt-bernstein matt-bernstein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you checked that this doesn't cause regressions or perf issues for when this endpoint is used to populate the label interface preview? I was imagining to have some kind of use_v2: bool = False param in the endpoint that would isolate it to only the new widget by default. If it just works for everything, then amazing, just gotta call out the extr test surface for QA

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants