Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release: 0.1.0-alpha.49 #195

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 27, 2024

Conversation

stainless-app[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@stainless-app stainless-app bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Automated Release PR

0.1.0-alpha.49 (2024-12-27)

Full Changelog: v0.1.0-alpha.48...v0.1.0-alpha.49

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

  • client: switch query params objects to use QueryParams (#141)

Refactors

  • client: switch query params objects to use QueryParams (#141) (5e5b4ab)

This pull request is managed by Stainless's GitHub App.

The semver version number is based on included commit messages. Alternatively, you can manually set the version number in the title of this pull request.

For a better experience, it is recommended to use either rebase-merge or squash-merge when merging this pull request.

🔗 Stainless website
📚 Read the docs
🙋 Reach out for help or questions

…141)

feat(client): add methods for removing additional properties
chore(internal): remove unnecessary validation methods
chore(internal): remove unnecessary nullable annotations
style(internal): minor changes to code ordering and syntax
# Migration
If you were accessing `_additionalProperties()` on a query params object, then previously it returned `Map<String, List<String>>`. Now it returns a dedicated `QueryParams` object. The `QueryParams` class is better suited for mapping a key to multiple values and has similar methods to `Map`.
@stainless-app stainless-app bot merged commit afc48fa into main Dec 27, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor Author

stainless-app bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants