Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Improving Initial Load for Participant Selector in BSDT #646

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: feature/242
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

abalimane
Copy link
Contributor

…o scoped notification to show when limit is exceeded

Critical Changes

Changes

  • Added info scoped notification to show when there are too many records to show
  • Added limit for the number of program engagements to show (set to 1000)

Issues Closed

New Metadata

Deleted Metadata

Definition of Done

Refer to Asteroids DoD document to see any additional details for the items below

  • Any net new LWC work has Sa11y tests & 50% or above lines JEST test coverage
  • CRUD/FLS is enforced in Apex
  • Permission sets are updated to account for CRUD|FLS|Tab|Classes
  • Field sets are updated to account for new fields
  • UX approval or UX not necessary
  • Link the pull request and work item by PR comment and Chatter post respectively, e.g. GUS: W-0000000: Work Name (Reorganize code; use custom iterator #303)
  • All acceptance criteria have been met
    • Developer
    • Code Reviewer
    • QA
  • PR contains draft release notes
  • QE story level testing completed

…o scoped notification to show when limit is exceeded
@abalimane abalimane changed the title Improving Initial Load for Participant Selector in BSDT [WIP] Improving Initial Load for Participant Selector in BSDT Aug 17, 2022
@abalimane abalimane added the wip Work in progress label Aug 17, 2022
@abalimane
Copy link
Contributor Author

TODO: Get Message to put into the info scoped notification for when there are more engagements than the limit

@salesforce-cla
Copy link

salesforce-cla bot commented Sep 8, 2022

Thanks for the contribution! It looks like @abalimane is an internal user so signing the CLA is not required. However, we need to confirm this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla:missing wip Work in progress
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant