Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Remove ambiguity indicating a given tutorial is based of a specific version #5

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

jcfr
Copy link
Member

@jcfr jcfr commented Jan 13, 2025

Previous wording seems to imply a given tutorial was only working for a specific application version instead of being created using a specific version.

Before After
image image

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Deploy Preview for training-slicer-org ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6a92598
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/training-slicer-org/deploys/6785509dba147f00087cc905
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-5--training-slicer-org.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@jcfr jcfr changed the title fix: Remove ambiguity indicating tutorial are based of a specfic version fix: Remove ambiguity indicating a given tutorial is based of a specific version Jan 13, 2025
…fic version

Previous wording seems to imply a given tutorial was only working
for a specific application version instead of being created using a
specific version.
@jcfr jcfr force-pushed the improve-app-version-reference branch from d77786a to 30676b4 Compare January 13, 2025 17:02
training.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: James Butler <[email protected]>
training.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jcfr jcfr merged commit 2cedb92 into main Jan 13, 2025
6 checks passed
@jcfr jcfr deleted the improve-app-version-reference branch January 13, 2025 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants