Add provider name to provider resource

[jplewa]

Task

Resolves: #228

Description

Disclaimer: for providers with complex names (such as aws-native), the names have the following format: AzurenativeProviderResource. I'll try to figure out if there's an easy way to make the name AzureNativeProviderResource instead, but the easiest way was to ignore the capitalization of complex names.

TODO

• Add tests Fix existing tests
• If the current solution is determined to be not good enough, figure out a way to capitalize complex names

[myhau]

LGTM

I wish I could delve into this more, but two things that I noticed (partially related to this PR)

• isProvider — passing this primitive argument through all the layers feels wrong to me. Maybe we should extend UsageKind by adding another Subject (Provider) or take a step back and think of a better design altogether?
• PulumiName — I think we could refactor it and its usage a bit along with NamingConfiguration + UsageKind abstractions

[jplewa]

I wish I could delve into this more, but two things that I noticed (partially related to this PR)

• isProvider — passing this primitive argument through all the layers feels wrong to me. Maybe we should extend UsageKind by adding another Subject (Provider) or take a step back and think of a better design altogether?

• PulumiName — I think we could refactor it and its usage a bit along with NamingConfiguration + UsageKind abstractions

Both good points. I tried to address the first one, but adding this new enum value isn't as straightforward as it seems (Subject isn't passed to PulumiName and I think we'd need to add an extra field in Modifiers which seems a bit clumsy). I'll create a task to address both of these things, but for now I'll merge it as is.

The task: #274