-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added top-level comaprator script #4008
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thje label is not correct this is cygwin (thus windows) and linux |
…hted "only in" files
Hello good people. Anybody around? The #3991 was closed as duplicate, and there is no duplicate toolchain. All the tools are written, but the readme is quite complex, and one must follow it. In addition there are quite a few corenr cases. This script remains valid contribution, which is putting it all together. I found small intersection with detection of |
needs linter fixes to start with. |
@karianna the linter is all green, but the job never finishes and timeouts:( |
I see: File:[/github/workspace/tooling/compare-builds.sh] |
thanx.I had missed it.Fixed
…--
Mgr. Jiri Vanek
***@***.***
---------- Původní e-mail ----------
Od: Martijn Verburg ***@***.***>
Komu: adoptium/temurin-build ***@***.***>
Kopie: judovana ***@***.***>, Author ***@***.***>
Datum: 10. 11. 2024 3:06:44
Předmět: Re: [adoptium/temurin-build] Added top-level comaprator script (PR
#4008)
"
I see:
File:[/github/workspace/tooling/compare-builds.sh]
2024-11-10 01:46:57 [WARN] Warnings found in [bash-exec] linter!
2024-11-10 01:46:57 [WARN] Error: File:[/github/workspace/tooling/compare-
builds.sh] is not executable
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
(#4008 (comment))
, or unsubscribe
(https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWFCSZB5U7GIOXAB7YSWHTZ725S3AVCNFSM6AAAAABQS6ZDBGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINRWGU2DQNRRGI)
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Message ID: <
***@***.***>
"
|
OK so the linter fails on JSCPD, ew have a config file for this, have you tried running locally? |
Even the local the
Is malicious. That code is obviously so nasty it deadlocks the tool. I will decompose it a bit. |
On contrary, when rest of the file is removed, and only "that" code is left in, it is in few ms finsihed. |
No success to narrow it more. Filed kucherenko/jscpd#716 Will redactor the |
Hello! I believe the #3991 was closed due to not understanding waht it is doing.
This script is not doing any rebuild, and thus is not comparing on identity, but on binary identically builds only. As it is, it do ot have any similar work present in the toolchain. Can you please reconsider its inclusion?
maybe the in file/main readme:
is misleading?