Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add new created state for idempotent server creation #606

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

fogninid
Copy link
Contributor

@fogninid fogninid commented Mar 4, 2025

SUMMARY

Add a new state for server creation without immediate start, to allow idempotent network customization before starting

ISSUE TYPE
  • Feature Pull Request
COMPONENT NAME

server

@jooola
Copy link
Collaborator

jooola commented Mar 13, 2025

Hey, thanks for the contribution!

Could you add a changelog fragment describing the change? Here is an example you can use:

https://github.com/ansible-collections/hetzner.hcloud/blob/fce8bc9bb971e87cacfeca115fe7be01b0f908d9/changelogs/fragments/load-balancer-status-filter.yml

@jooola jooola changed the title feat: add new state for idempotent server creation without starting feat: add new created state for idempotent server creation Mar 21, 2025
@jooola
Copy link
Collaborator

jooola commented Mar 21, 2025

I ran the test locally and it is working as expected.

@jooola jooola merged commit 4534cf6 into ansible-collections:main Mar 21, 2025
41 of 57 checks passed
jooola pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[4.3.0](4.2.2...4.3.0)
(2025-03-21)


### Features

* add new `created` state for idempotent server creation
([#606](#606))
([4534cf6](4534cf6))


### Bug Fixes

* only update load balancer service when changed
([#603](#603))
([6956596](6956596))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants