-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 425
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate from solana-feature-set to agave-feature-set #5520
Conversation
Backports to the beta branch are to be avoided unless absolutely necessary for fixing bugs, security issues, and perf regressions. Changes intended for backport should be structured such that a minimum effective diff can be committed separately from any refactoring, plumbing, cleanup, etc that are not strictly necessary to achieve the goal. Any of the latter should go only into master and ride the normal stabilization schedule. Exceptions include CI/metrics changes, CLI improvements and documentation updates on a case by case basis. |
The Firedancer team maintains a line-for-line reimplementation of the |
e304857
to
e534cae
Compare
b01a264
to
a97d05d
Compare
Ok pretty confident there are no more lingering usages of |
After this change we will need to update |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5520 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 83.3% 83.3%
=======================================
Files 829 829
Lines 373645 373649 +4
=======================================
+ Hits 311549 311560 +11
+ Misses 62096 62089 -7 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great, thanks for fighting through this! I followed along with all uses from solana_sdk
as well, and it looks like you caught them all.
a97d05d
to
00e69a7
Compare
@joncinque I rebased to pick up #5525 and also added a change to bump solana-sdk to v2.2.2 which has fixed deprecation annotations to ensure that devs do not unintentionally use modules from sdk when they should be using agave crates. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
* Migrate from solana-feature-set to agave-feature-set * Bump solana-sdk to fix deprecation warnings (cherry picked from commit cb32984) # Conflicts: # Cargo.lock # Cargo.toml # cli/src/program.rs # cli/src/program_v4.rs # cli/tests/program.rs # core/src/banking_stage/latest_unprocessed_votes.rs # core/tests/scheduler_cost_adjustment.rs # genesis/Cargo.toml # genesis/src/main.rs # gossip/Cargo.toml # ledger/src/blockstore_processor.rs # ledger/src/leader_schedule_utils.rs # precompiles/Cargo.toml # precompiles/src/ed25519.rs # precompiles/src/lib.rs # precompiles/src/secp256k1.rs # precompiles/src/secp256r1.rs # program-runtime/Cargo.toml # program-runtime/src/invoke_context.rs # programs/bpf_loader/Cargo.toml # programs/bpf_loader/src/lib.rs # programs/bpf_loader/src/syscalls/cpi.rs # programs/bpf_loader/src/syscalls/mod.rs # programs/sbf/Cargo.lock # programs/sbf/Cargo.toml # programs/sbf/benches/bpf_loader.rs # programs/vote/benches/vote_instructions.rs # runtime/Cargo.toml # runtime/src/bank.rs # runtime/src/bank/check_transactions.rs # runtime/src/bank/tests.rs # runtime/src/verify_precompiles.rs # svm/Cargo.toml # svm/examples/Cargo.lock # svm/examples/paytube/src/processor.rs # svm/src/account_loader.rs # svm/src/transaction_processor.rs # svm/tests/conformance.rs # svm/tests/integration_test.rs # svm/tests/mock_bank.rs
* Migrate from solana-feature-set to agave-feature-set * Bump solana-sdk to fix deprecation warnings
Problem
Codebase still uses the sdk feature set.
Summary of Changes
Fixes #