Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adds architecture prop on defineFunction #1935

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ykethan
Copy link
Member

@ykethan ykethan commented Aug 30, 2024

Problem

Allows users to chooses between x86_64 and arm64 for the function. As arm64 could provide a better price and performance than the equivalent function running on x86_64 architecture
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/comparing-aws-lambda-arm-vs-x86-performance-cost-and-analysis-2/
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/foundation-arch.html

Issue number, if available:

Changes

Corresponding docs PR, if applicable:

Validation

Checklist

  • If this PR includes a functional change to the runtime behavior of the code, I have added or updated automated test coverage for this change.
  • If this PR requires a change to the Project Architecture README, I have included that update in this PR.
  • If this PR requires a docs update, I have linked to that docs PR above.
  • If this PR modifies E2E tests, makes changes to resource provisioning, or makes SDK calls, I have run the PR checks with the run-e2e label set.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@ykethan ykethan requested review from a team as code owners August 30, 2024 00:07
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Aug 30, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 11c9f67

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@aws-amplify/backend-function Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant