-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix incremental commit/decommit state events #1894
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
83d17b7
to
ae4b80d
Compare
We confirmed this working by being able to close and fanout a head we could not before! |
These have not been carrying and updating the 'chainState' in our 'HeadState' aggregate. This would result in the chain layer not restarting from these last known chain points and we saw the hydra-node re-observing deposits, incrementas and (likely) decrements. Thi also re-order cases in aggregate/aggregateHistory to see better that we ought to use chainState in some of them.
c6d9e83
to
6c260b1
Compare
Transaction cost differencesScript summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
40 | - | - | - | - |
Commit
transaction costs
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
54 | - | - | - | - |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - | - |
4 | - | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - | - |
6 | - | - | - | - | - |
7 | - | - | - | - | - |
8 | - | - | - | - | - |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | |||
37 | - | - | - | - |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
40 | - | - | - | - |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
34 | - | - | - | - |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
27 | - | - | - | - |
FanOut
transaction costs
UTxO, Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(0, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(1, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(5, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(10, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(20, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(37, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6094 | 11.02 | 3.43 | 0.53 |
2 | 6294 | 13.47 | 4.19 | 0.57 |
3 | 6493 | 15.71 | 4.88 | 0.60 |
5 | 6898 | 19.76 | 6.10 | 0.66 |
10 | 7901 | 31.40 | 9.68 | 0.82 |
40 | 13935 | 98.97 | 30.42 | 1.78 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 561 | 2.44 | 1.16 | 0.20 |
2 | 739 | 3.38 | 1.73 | 0.22 |
3 | 922 | 4.36 | 2.33 | 0.24 |
5 | 1280 | 6.41 | 3.60 | 0.28 |
10 | 2183 | 12.13 | 7.25 | 0.40 |
54 | 10066 | 98.61 | 68.52 | 1.88 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 525 | 25.64 | 7.39 | 0.43 |
2 | 114 | 636 | 33.84 | 9.73 | 0.52 |
3 | 171 | 747 | 45.75 | 12.96 | 0.65 |
4 | 224 | 858 | 53.47 | 15.21 | 0.73 |
5 | 282 | 969 | 59.06 | 16.94 | 0.79 |
6 | 340 | 1081 | 69.73 | 19.92 | 0.90 |
7 | 395 | 1192 | 76.12 | 21.84 | 0.98 |
8 | 450 | 1303 | 98.98 | 27.80 | 1.21 |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1753 | 24.01 | 7.84 | 0.48 |
2 | 1936 | 27.07 | 9.49 | 0.52 |
3 | 2078 | 28.43 | 10.60 | 0.55 |
5 | 2452 | 33.95 | 13.76 | 0.63 |
10 | 3338 | 46.09 | 21.14 | 0.82 |
38 | 7357 | 98.16 | 56.41 | 1.67 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 609 | 23.71 | 7.54 | 0.42 |
2 | 798 | 26.94 | 9.08 | 0.47 |
3 | 925 | 28.54 | 10.19 | 0.50 |
5 | 1277 | 33.54 | 12.92 | 0.57 |
10 | 2066 | 44.57 | 19.27 | 0.74 |
40 | 6268 | 96.19 | 53.52 | 1.59 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 644 | 30.91 | 9.67 | 0.50 |
2 | 809 | 31.02 | 10.44 | 0.51 |
3 | 957 | 32.77 | 11.65 | 0.54 |
5 | 1257 | 37.02 | 14.37 | 0.61 |
10 | 2068 | 47.92 | 21.35 | 0.78 |
32 | 5270 | 97.38 | 51.49 | 1.54 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 670 | 35.99 | 11.01 | 0.55 |
2 | 830 | 38.15 | 12.33 | 0.58 |
3 | 999 | 41.03 | 13.95 | 0.63 |
5 | 1353 | 45.87 | 16.86 | 0.70 |
10 | 2020 | 57.36 | 23.71 | 0.87 |
27 | 4519 | 97.51 | 47.55 | 1.48 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5982 | 28.16 | 9.29 | 0.71 |
2 | 6055 | 36.31 | 11.92 | 0.80 |
3 | 6324 | 48.87 | 16.19 | 0.94 |
4 | 6326 | 56.20 | 18.50 | 1.02 |
5 | 6560 | 68.24 | 22.52 | 1.15 |
6 | 6642 | 73.56 | 24.29 | 1.21 |
7 | 6765 | 83.01 | 27.40 | 1.32 |
8 | 6832 | 91.47 | 30.22 | 1.41 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 0 | 0 | 6092 | 20.12 | 6.62 | 0.63 |
10 | 1 | 56 | 6125 | 22.25 | 7.44 | 0.65 |
10 | 5 | 284 | 6260 | 30.77 | 10.75 | 0.75 |
10 | 10 | 569 | 6430 | 41.42 | 14.88 | 0.88 |
10 | 20 | 1140 | 6772 | 61.80 | 22.83 | 1.11 |
10 | 30 | 1710 | 7113 | 83.96 | 31.38 | 1.37 |
10 | 37 | 2102 | 7344 | 97.56 | 36.72 | 1.53 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2025-03-13 13:00:46.60527032 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 300 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 4.509546590 |
P99 | 9.803153989999984ms |
P95 | 5.550554300000003ms |
P50 | 4.23365ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Memory data
Time | Used | Free |
---|---|---|
2025-03-13 12:59:30.083376867 UTC | 866M | 3745M |
2025-03-13 12:59:35.083176376 UTC | 988M | 3591M |
2025-03-13 12:59:40.083179149 UTC | 989M | 3589M |
2025-03-13 12:59:45.083144089 UTC | 993M | 3585M |
2025-03-13 12:59:50.083174548 UTC | 992M | 3585M |
2025-03-13 12:59:55.083119611 UTC | 994M | 3583M |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 900 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 32.831722002 |
P99 | 74.02353878ms |
P95 | 57.30759395ms |
P50 | 29.15069ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Memory data
Time | Used | Free |
---|---|---|
2025-03-13 13:00:08.59451124 UTC | 909M | 3678M |
2025-03-13 13:00:13.594464783 UTC | 1158M | 3428M |
2025-03-13 13:00:18.594893183 UTC | 1212M | 3316M |
2025-03-13 13:00:23.60025317 UTC | 1230M | 3249M |
2025-03-13 13:00:28.594449379 UTC | 1230M | 3242M |
2025-03-13 13:00:33.594482687 UTC | 1242M | 3229M |
2025-03-13 13:00:38.594605673 UTC | 1242M | 3229M |
2025-03-13 13:00:43.594478643 UTC | 1244M | 3227M |
These have not been carrying and updating the 'chainState' in our 'HeadState' aggregate. This would result in the chain layer not restarting from these last known chain points and we saw the hydra-node re-observing deposits, incrementas and (likely) decrements.