Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-24.3: plpgsql: do not drop a CALL statement with unused OUT params #143289

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2025

Conversation

blathers-crl[bot]
Copy link

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Backport 1/1 commits from #143173 on behalf of @DrewKimball.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


This commit fixes a bug that could cause the routine invocation for a PL/pgSQL CALL statement to be dropped if the stored proc had out params that were all unused by the calling routine. The fix is simple - just add an optimization barrier if the called procedure is volatile.

Fixes #143171

Release note (bug fix): Fixed a bug existing since PL/pgSQL CALL statements were introduced in v24.1, where the called procedure could be dropped if it had OUT parameters that were not used by the calling routine.


Release justification: correctness bug fix

This commit fixes a bug that could cause the routine invocation for a
PL/pgSQL CALL statement to be dropped if the stored proc had out params
that were all unused by the calling routine. The fix is simple - just
add an optimization barrier if the called procedure is volatile (and may
have side effects).

Fixes #143171

Release note (bug fix): Fixed a bug existing since PL/pgSQL CALL statements
were introduced in v24.1, where the called procedure could be dropped if
it had OUT parameters that were not used by the calling routine.
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 21, 2025 17:53
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-24.3-143173 branch from 0086645 to 9f08627 Compare March 21, 2025 17:53
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from DrewKimball and removed request for a team March 21, 2025 17:53
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Mar 21, 2025
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Backports should only be created for serious
    issues
    or test-only changes.
  • Backports should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Backports should change as little code as possible.
  • Backports should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Backports should not add new functionality (except as defined
    here).
  • Backports must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
  • All backports must be reviewed by the owning areas TL. For more information as to how that review should be conducted, please consult the backport
    policy
    .
If your backport adds new functionality, please ensure that the following additional criteria are satisfied:
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters. State changes must be further protected such that nodes running old binaries will not be negatively impacted by the new state (with a mixed version test added).
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.
  • Your backport must be accompanied by a post to the appropriate Slack
    channel (#db-backports-point-releases or #db-backports-XX-X-release) for awareness and discussion.

Also, please add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this
backport.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from yuzefovich March 21, 2025 17:53
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added the backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches label Mar 21, 2025
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@DrewKimball DrewKimball requested a review from michae2 March 21, 2025 17:57
Copy link
Member

@yuzefovich yuzefovich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 0 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @DrewKimball and @michae2)

@DrewKimball DrewKimball merged commit 0f588ad into release-24.3 Mar 24, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
@DrewKimball DrewKimball deleted the blathers/backport-release-24.3-143173 branch March 24, 2025 16:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. target-release-24.3.10
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants