feat(abci): add RequestFinalizeSnapshot #119
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request updates dependency versions in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant RD as RequestDispatcher
participant A as Application
C->>RD: Send FinalizeSnapshot request
RD->>A: Invoke finalize_snapshot(request)
A-->>RD: Return ResponseFinalizeSnapshot
RD->>C: Respond with final result
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review all |
🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 6347 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1273 @lklimek Thank you for the PR. I've reviewed the changes and have the following feedback:
Would you like me to create an issue to track these improvements? ✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
abci/src/application.rs (1)
106-111: Add documentation for thefinalize_snapshotmethod.The method lacks documentation explaining its purpose and usage, unlike other methods in the trait. Consider adding documentation that explains:
- When this method is called in the ABCI lifecycle
- What the method is expected to do
- Any important considerations for implementations
+ /// Called when all snapshot chunks have been received and applied. + /// This allows the application to perform any final cleanup or validation + /// of the reconstructed state. fn finalize_snapshot( &self, _request: abci::RequestFinalizeSnapshot, ) -> Result<abci::ResponseFinalizeSnapshot, abci::ResponseException> { Ok(Default::default()) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
abci/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)abci/src/application.rs(2 hunks)abci/src/tracing_span.rs(1 hunks)proto/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)proto/build.rs(1 hunks)
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (2)
- abci/src/tracing_span.rs
- abci/src/application.rs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test-all
🔇 Additional comments (9)
abci/src/tracing_span.rs (3)
90-90: LGTM!The new match arm for
FinalizeSnapshotfollows the existing pattern and is correctly placed in alphabetical order.
90-90: LGTM!The new match arm for
FinalizeSnapshotis correctly implemented and maintains the alphabetical ordering of the match arms.
90-90: LGTM!The addition of the
FinalizeSnapshotmatch arm follows the existing pattern and maintains alphabetical ordering.abci/src/application.rs (3)
179-179: LGTM!The new match arm for
FinalizeSnapshotis correctly implemented and well-placed with other snapshot-related operations.
179-179: LGTM!The match arm for
FinalizeSnapshotis correctly implemented and follows the established pattern.
179-179: LGTM!The
FinalizeSnapshotmatch arm is correctly implemented and placed logically with other snapshot-related requests.proto/build.rs (1)
7-7: Verify the commit hash and consider adding documentation.Using a commit hash instead of a semantic version makes it harder to track the version being used. Consider:
- Adding a comment explaining which version this commit hash represents.
- Verifying that this commit hash exists in the Tenderdash repository.
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the commit hash exists in the Tenderdash repository. # Test: Check if the commit hash exists in the Tenderdash repository gh api \ -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \ -H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \ /repos/dashpay/tenderdash/commits/9d3dae43c3803d5372e2b45a087fd1c0f46192feLength of output: 4456
Commit hash verified; consider adding inline documentation.
The commit hash
9d3dae43c3803d5372e2b45a087fd1c0f46192feexists in the Tenderdash repository (commit "chore: fix lint warning" by Lukasz Klimek on 2025-01-20). It’s advisable to add a comment explaining which version this commit represents to aid clarity.proto/Cargo.toml (1)
83-83: Verify compatibility with the relaxed version constraint.The version constraint for
serde_jsonhas been relaxed from "1.0.125" to "1.0". While this allows for more flexibility, it's important to:
- Verify compatibility with other dependencies that might rely on specific
serde_jsonfeatures.- Consider using a minimum version constraint (e.g., "^1.0.125") to ensure compatibility while allowing updates.
Let's check for potential compatibility issues:
abci/Cargo.toml (1)
66-66: Verify compatibility with the relaxed version constraint.Similar to the change in
proto/Cargo.toml, the version constraint forserde_jsonhas been relaxed from "1.0.128" to "1.0". While consistency across packages is good, consider:
- Using a minimum version constraint (e.g., "^1.0.128") to ensure compatibility while allowing updates.
- Verifying that all features required by the optional
serdefeature are available in older versions.Let's check for potential compatibility issues:
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
For state synchronization, we need a new request, RequestFinalizeSnapshot, that will provide Drive with most recent
block. Drive needs it to verify and rebuild its cached snapshot.
What was done?
serde_jsondependency requirement to fix some build issues,How Has This Been Tested?
Breaking Changes
New ABCI endpoint RequestFinalizeSnapshot implemented. Default response can be empty, so non-breaking change, but requires new Tenderdash 1.5.x.
Checklist:
For repository code-owners and collaborators only