Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add grouped updates smoke tests for yarn #76

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bdragon
Copy link
Member

@bdragon bdragon commented Jun 13, 2023

Adds smoke tests for yarn and makes some updates to existing smoke tests along the way.

There's a yarn berry workspaces project in this repo, which led me to think it was being used in the tests/smoke-yarn-berry-workspaces.yaml test, but in fact the test was actually running against another repo, https://github.com/dsp-testing/dependabot-core-6432. To avoid confusion, I updated the smoke test to use the workspaces project included in this repo (dependabot/smoke-tests).

@bdragon bdragon requested a review from a team as a code owner June 13, 2023 23:28
@bdragon bdragon force-pushed the bdragon/yarn-group-rules branch 2 times, most recently from 0cb2e5d to 17bb401 Compare June 15, 2023 16:03
@bdragon bdragon force-pushed the bdragon/yarn-group-rules branch 4 times, most recently from 20c4c08 to eb56caf Compare June 15, 2023 20:34
Copy link
Contributor

@brrygrdn brrygrdn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apologies @bdragon I overlooked reviewing this - it looks like we need to fix a conflict in the run-all script but thanks for adding thorough grouping tests for the different combinations 👍🏻 🚀

@jeffwidman
Copy link
Member

@bdragon any idea if the tests this adds are already covered since you put this up? Or does it still add new ones?

I don't mind picking it up to fix merge conflicts and get it across the line, but thought I'd doublecheck with you first to see if you think it's still worth doing since you have more context.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants