-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat AdminClient: support delete_records #2359
Open
alfaix
wants to merge
44
commits into
dpkp:master
Choose a base branch
from
alfaix:alfaix/delete-records
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Authored-by: Ruslan <[email protected]> Cherrypicked-by: Arsen Kitov <[email protected]>
alfaix
force-pushed
the
alfaix/delete-records
branch
from
March 21, 2023 07:23
5418a64
to
d944b36
Compare
…terations for Kafka 0.8.2 and Python 3.12 (dpkp#159) * skip failing tests for PyPy since they work locally * Reconfigure tests for PyPy and 3.12 * Skip partitioner tests in test_partitioner.py if 3.12 and 0.8.2 * Update test_partitioner.py * Update test_producer.py * Timeout tests after ten minutes * Set 0.8.2.2 to be experimental from hereon * Formally support PyPy 3.9
* Test Kafka 0.8.2.2 using Python 3.11 in the meantime * Override PYTHON_LATEST conditionally in python-package.yml * Update python-package.yml * add python annotation to kafka version test matrix * Update python-package.yml * try python 3.10
* Remove support for EOL'ed versions of Python * Update setup.py
Too many MRs to review... so little time.
After stop/start kafka service, kafka-python may use 100% CPU caused by busy-retry while the socket was closed. This fix the issue by unregister the socket if the fd is negative. Co-authored-by: Orange Kao <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ryar Nyah <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Denis Otkidach <[email protected]>
The former has been deprecated since setuptools 56 Co-authored-by: micwoj92 <[email protected]>
* docs: Update syntax in README.rst * docs: Update code block syntax in docs/index.rst --------- Co-authored-by: HalfSweet <[email protected]>
* Fix crc32c's __main__ for Python 3 * Remove TODO from _crc32c.py --------- Co-authored-by: Yonatan Goldschmidt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dave Voutila <[email protected]>
…pkp#155) * handling OSError * better error output * removed traceback logging --------- Co-authored-by: Alexander Sibiryakov <[email protected]>
…pkp#134) wakeup When wakeup() is called, we sometime notice that we get an endless prints: "Unable to send to wakeup socket!". Those prints are spamming the logs. This commit aims to address it by allowing restating the application via an intentional exception raise. This behavior is configurable and its default is backward compatible. Signed-off-by: shimon-armis <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: shimon-armis <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: drewdogg <[email protected]>
* Support custom SASL mechanisms There is some interest in supporting various SASL mechanisms not currently included in the library: * dpkp#2110 (DMS) * dpkp#2204 (SSPI) * dpkp#2232 (AWS_MSK_IAM) Adding these mechanisms in the core library may be undesirable due to: * Increased maintenance burden. * Unavailable testing environments. * Vendor specificity. This commit provides a quick prototype for a pluggable SASL system. --- **Example** To define a custom SASL mechanism a module must implement two methods: ```py def validate_config(conn): # Check configuration values, available libraries, etc. assert conn.config['vendor_specific_setting'] is not None, ( 'vendor_specific_setting required when sasl_mechanism=MY_SASL' ) def try_authenticate(conn, future): # Do authentication routine and return resolved Future with failed # or succeeded state. ``` And then the custom mechanism should be registered before initializing a KafkaAdminClient, KafkaConsumer, or KafkaProducer: ```py import kafka.sasl from kafka import KafkaProducer import my_sasl kafka.sasl.register_mechanism('MY_SASL', my_sasl) producer = KafkaProducer(sasl_mechanism='MY_SASL') ``` --- **Notes** **ABCs** This prototype does not implement an ABC for custom SASL mechanisms. Using an ABC would reduce a few of the explicit assertions involved with registering a mechanism and is a viable option. Due to differing feature sets between py2/py3 this option was not explored, but shouldn't be difficult. **Private Methods** This prototype relies on some methods that are currently marked as **private** in `BrokerConnection`. * `._can_send_recv` * `._lock` * `._recv_bytes_blocking` * `._send_bytes_blocking` A pluggable system would require stable interfaces for these actions. **Alternative Approach** If the module-scoped dict modification in `register_mechanism` feels too clunky maybe the addtional mechanisms can be specified via an argument when initializing one of the `Kafka*` classes? * Add test_msk.py by @mattoberle * add msk to __init__ and check for extension in conn.py * rename try_authenticate in msk.py * fix imports * fix imports * add botocore to requirements-dev.txt * add boto3 to requirements-dev.txt * add awscli to requirements-dev.txt * add awscli to workflow since it takes too long to install normally * just install botocore i guess * just install boto3 i guess * force reinstall awscli * try something weird * ok now the dang tests should work and if they don't i'll cry * skip the msk test for now... * Revert "skip the msk test for now..." This reverts commit 1c29667. * skip the msk test for now... * nvm just needed to update tox lol * Update kafka/sasl/gssapi.py Co-authored-by: code-review-doctor[bot] <72320148+code-review-doctor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Update kafka/sasl/oauthbearer.py Co-authored-by: code-review-doctor[bot] <72320148+code-review-doctor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Update kafka/sasl/plain.py Co-authored-by: code-review-doctor[bot] <72320148+code-review-doctor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Update kafka/sasl/scram.py Co-authored-by: code-review-doctor[bot] <72320148+code-review-doctor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Update kafka/sasl/msk.py Co-authored-by: code-review-doctor[bot] <72320148+code-review-doctor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Matt Oberle <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: code-review-doctor[bot] <72320148+code-review-doctor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Now that the codebase has been modernised by using pyupgrade, we can also remove all backported vendor modules, and all uses of them.
I implemented API KEY 35 from the official Apache Kafka documentation. This functionality is requested in issue # 2163 and this is an implementation proposal. Co-authored-by: chopatate <[email protected]>
… topic naming (dpkp#172) * Update conftest.py to use request.node.originalname instead for legal topic naming Otherwise parametrization doesn't work. * Update test/conftest.py Co-authored-by: code-review-doctor[bot] <72320148+code-review-doctor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: code-review-doctor[bot] <72320148+code-review-doctor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* KIP-345 Add static consumer membership support * KIP-345 Add examples to docs * KIP-345 Add leave_group_on_close flag https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6995 * KIP-345 Add tests for static membership * KIP-345 Update docs for leave_group_on_close option * Update changelog.rst * remove six from base.py * Update base.py * Update base.py * Update base.py * Update changelog.rst * Update README.rst --------- Co-authored-by: Denis Kazakov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Denis Kazakov <[email protected]>
* Add typing * define types as Struct for simplicity's sake
…before definition (dpkp#138) * fix if statement logic and add zstd check * fix if statement logic and add zstd uncompress * fix imports * avoid variable be used before definition * Remove unused import from legacy_records.py --------- Co-authored-by: Alexandre Souza <[email protected]>
…not installed (dpkp#175) Closes wbarnha#174.
…pkp#132) * Add connection_timeout_ms and reset the timeout counter more often * Refactor last_attempt -> last_activity This semantically reflects the new usage of the variable better * Make tests work again * Add unit tests of new BrokerConnection functionality The test mocks parts of BrokerConnection in order to assert that the connection state machine allows long-lasting connections as long as the state progresses often enough * Re-introduce last_attempt to avoid breakage --------- Co-authored-by: Liam S. Crouch <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey!
This PR is based on #2062
It implements delete_records for AdminClient. Thanks to @10101010 for the initial PR.
This PR contains the following improvements on that version:
I tested it locally with 2.6.0 + py3.9, I'm assuming CI will check for everything else.
Additionally, I would like some direction from maintainers on whether it is possible/required to test this with a multi-broker setup - I couldn't find an example in the tests that uses multiple brokers.
Resolves: #2344
This change is