-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add operator survey to repo #3
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jberkus The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Probably better to put the survey under the existing directory docs (create a subdirectory |
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ | |||
# Etcd Operator Survey Results |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: etcd is always lowercase. There are several places in the doc to update this.
# Etcd Operator Survey Results | |
# etcd Operator Survey Results |
Isn't the Docs folder going to eventually hold the docs for the actual operator? In which case we don't want survey results there. |
I would make a case for user facing operator docs to go on the etcd website for the most part. |
The goal is to organize all documents under one directory. It's similar to etcd documents, in which there are different kinds of docs. |
This adds the operator survey summary, in MD format, to this repo. It also creates a WG subdirectory, which seems like a useful place to stash files related to WG activities.