Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add operator survey to repo #3

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

jberkus
Copy link

@jberkus jberkus commented Sep 6, 2024

This adds the operator survey summary, in MD format, to this repo. It also creates a WG subdirectory, which seems like a useful place to stash files related to WG activities.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jberkus

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Sep 6, 2024

Probably better to put the survey under the existing directory docs (create a subdirectory survey under docs)?

@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
# Etcd Operator Survey Results
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: etcd is always lowercase. There are several places in the doc to update this.

Suggested change
# Etcd Operator Survey Results
# etcd Operator Survey Results

@jberkus
Copy link
Author

jberkus commented Sep 10, 2024

Probably better to put the survey under the existing directory docs (create a subdirectory survey under docs)?

Isn't the Docs folder going to eventually hold the docs for the actual operator? In which case we don't want survey results there.

@jmhbnz
Copy link
Member

jmhbnz commented Sep 10, 2024

Isn't the Docs folder going to eventually hold the docs for the actual operator? In which case we don't want survey results there.

I would make a case for user facing operator docs to go on the etcd website for the most part.

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Sep 17, 2024

Probably better to put the survey under the existing directory docs (create a subdirectory survey under docs)?

Isn't the Docs folder going to eventually hold the docs for the actual operator? In which case we don't want survey results there.

The goal is to organize all documents under one directory. It's similar to etcd documents, in which there are different kinds of docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants