-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 585
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build with .NET 8.0 #2818
Open
Thorium
wants to merge
17
commits into
fsprojects:master
Choose a base branch
from
Thorium:net8-build
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Build with .NET 8.0 #2818
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d2c975c
Build with .NET 8.0
Thorium 7d3035c
Some more fsproj replace targetframeworks found
Thorium 811a633
It seems GitHub workflow is building as Release
Thorium 9127450
Github workflow pipeline add .NET 8
Thorium 70e89cc
Trying to test if the recursive build.fsx could be avoided
Thorium fd12d08
RuntimeIdentifiers for net8
Thorium 45981b5
MSBuild.StructuredLogger update to 2.2.337
Thorium d6d7c74
Trying to avoid dotnet-tool picking net6.0
Thorium 4559dfb
CoreCache.fs is not finding System.Runtime etc that are part of .NET …
Thorium 1d5a9c3
Updated Expecto
Thorium 1971e72
Expecto update part 2
Thorium c3ce67f
build-script warning update
Thorium 4249c4a
Merge branch 'master' into net8-build
Thorium af73fe3
As per comment by Numpsy the .NET Framework assembleis have removed t…
Thorium f2835dc
sorry, forgot Fantomas
Thorium 27b930a
build-script add framework
Thorium 156fe2d
could we run integration test with .NET8 ? (they still seem to fall t…
Thorium File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"sdk" : { | ||
"version": "6.0.301", | ||
"version": "8.0.304", | ||
"rollForward": "latestMinor" | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question: Does it still need to reference all 4 of these Microsoft.Build packages here?
Older versions of MSBuild.StructuredLogger used to depend on all of these, but newer versions (including the 2.1.815 build currently used by Fake) only depend on
Framework
andUtilities.Core
so I wonder if the base one andTasks.Core
can be removed now?Same question about paket.dependencies too.