Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test reproducing hunk locking problem [do not merge] #4416

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mtsgrd
Copy link
Contributor

@mtsgrd mtsgrd commented Jul 16, 2024

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the rust Pull requests that update Rust code label Jul 16, 2024
@mtsgrd mtsgrd force-pushed the Lock-problem-reproduction branch from a6976c4 to 4ec08dd Compare July 17, 2024 00:10
@daniilS
Copy link
Contributor

daniilS commented Jul 17, 2024

@mtsgrd #4136 is another case that triggered the same error, but without changing line numbers - not sure if that would need its own regression test, or if it's also covered by this one.

@mtsgrd mtsgrd force-pushed the Lock-problem-reproduction branch from 5f2c9de to 1c3246b Compare July 17, 2024 20:34
@mtsgrd mtsgrd marked this pull request as draft July 17, 2024 20:34
@mtsgrd
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtsgrd commented Jul 17, 2024

@daniilS the two are definitely related, in that they cause(d) the same kind of panic. This one is preventable though, it's a matter of locking the change to the branch it depends on.

@mtsgrd mtsgrd changed the title Add test reproducing hunk locking problem Add test reproducing hunk locking problem [do not merge] Jul 17, 2024
@mtsgrd mtsgrd force-pushed the Lock-problem-reproduction branch from 1c3246b to 63bd442 Compare July 17, 2024 20:45
@mtsgrd mtsgrd force-pushed the Lock-problem-reproduction branch from 63bd442 to 7fcb68e Compare July 18, 2024 12:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rust Pull requests that update Rust code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants