Alpine compatibility of binary #91
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@gjcarneiro ping! I am using a Docker image from alpine and would like to use the binary directly without having to install python on the image itself to install yacron. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I had the problem to run the binary within alpine based containers as also mentioned in #66.
Because also the gcompat package does not solve that for me, I created a second Dockerfile for alpine and also add a "all-alpine" make command.
To create a alpine compatible binary, which is not working in debian based containers, run
make all-alpinewithin pyinstaller folder.Maybe the binary can also added to releases.