Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(enhancement): add json definition and method to trace info #964

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2025

Conversation

jeevatkm
Copy link
Member

  • its preparation for upcoming debug log formatter

- its preparation for upcoming debug log formatter
@jeevatkm jeevatkm added enhancement v3 For resty v3 labels Jan 25, 2025
@jeevatkm jeevatkm added this to the v3.0.0 Milestone milestone Jan 25, 2025
@jeevatkm jeevatkm self-assigned this Jan 25, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.81%. Comparing base (236685e) to head (60978d6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on v3.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##               v3     #964   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.81%   99.81%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        3835     3844    +9     
=======================================
+ Hits         3828     3837    +9     
  Misses          5        5           
  Partials        2        2           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.81% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jeevatkm jeevatkm merged commit 2e3e58b into v3 Jan 25, 2025
8 checks passed
@jeevatkm jeevatkm deleted the add-json-to-traceinfo branch January 25, 2025 06:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement v3 For resty v3
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant