Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor!: Merge operational_config into limits_config configuration block #15762

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chaudum
Copy link
Contributor

@chaudum chaudum commented Jan 15, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR unifies how "limits" (per-tenant runtime overrides) are used throughout the code base.

The operational_config has been introduced with #12448 together with a separate implementation how per-tenant runtime configuration settings are handled. This lead to inconsistencies in the code base.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories label Jan 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 15, 2025

@chaudum chaudum force-pushed the chaudum/rewrite-runtime-config branch from 0697a08 to b4d3af0 Compare January 15, 2025 15:23
@chaudum chaudum force-pushed the chaudum/rewrite-runtime-config branch from b4d3af0 to 6e58309 Compare January 16, 2025 07:46
Signed-off-by: Christian Haudum <[email protected]>
@chaudum chaudum force-pushed the chaudum/rewrite-runtime-config branch from 6e58309 to 6beca36 Compare January 16, 2025 07:47
@chaudum chaudum changed the title chore!: Merge operational_config into limits_config refactor!: Merge operational_config into limits_config configuration block Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/XXL type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant