Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add connection and attachment status documentation #38098

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 25, 2025

Conversation

MaestroOnICe
Copy link
Contributor

@MaestroOnICe MaestroOnICe commented Mar 20, 2025

Proposed change

This PR adds information for two new binary sensors that show the attachment status of the Core to the electricity meter and the connection status between Core and Bridge.

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

  • Link to parent pull request in the codebase:
  • Link to parent pull request in the Brands repository:
  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a sensor to display the connection status between the Core and Bridge.
    • Added a sensor to indicate whether the IOmeter Core is attached to the electricity meter.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added in-progress This PR/Issue is currently being worked on needs-rebase The PR has been branched of the wrong base branch or targets an incorrect target branch next This PR goes into the next branch labels Mar 20, 2025
@home-assistant
Copy link

It seems that this PR is targeted against an incorrect branch. Documentation updates which apply to our current stable release should target the current branch. Please change the target branch of this PR to current and rebase if needed. If this is documentation for a new feature, please add a link to that PR in your description.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2cb08fa
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/67dc2506d2784a000880a98f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-38098--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo label Mar 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 20, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the IOmeter integration by adding two new sensors. One sensor reports the connection status between the Core and the Bridge, while the other indicates whether the IOmeter Core is attached to the electricity meter. These updates expand the monitoring capabilities documented in the integration.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
source/_integrations/.../iometer.markdown Added two new sensors: "Core/Bridge connection status" and "Core attachment status" to the integration.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Integration
    participant SensorModule

    User->>Integration: Request sensor statuses
    Integration->>SensorModule: Query "Core/Bridge connection status"
    Integration->>SensorModule: Query "Core attachment status"
    SensorModule-->>Integration: Return sensor statuses
    Integration-->>User: Display sensor statuses
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 24cbb15 and 2cb08fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/iometer.markdown (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • source/_integrations/iometer.markdown

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/iometer.markdown (1)

54-54: Remove Trailing Whitespace

The list item on this line contains an extra trailing space, which violates markdownlint (MD009, no-trailing-spaces). Please remove the additional space for consistency.

- - Core/Bridge connection status: If Core and Bridge are connected 
+ - Core/Bridge connection status: If Core and Bridge are connected
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

54-54: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 03ed223 and d825ded.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/iometer.markdown (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
source/_integrations/iometer.markdown

54-54: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)

🪛 GitHub Actions: home-assistant.io Test
source/_integrations/iometer.markdown

[error] 55-55: This is a commonly misspelled word. Correct it to electricity (common-misspellings)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/iometer.markdown (1)

54-54: Remove trailing whitespace.
Line 54 contains a trailing space that triggers markdown lint warnings. Please remove it to meet the markdown style guidelines.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

54-54: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d825ded and 24cbb15.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/iometer.markdown (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
source/_integrations/iometer.markdown

54-54: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/iometer.markdown (1)

54-55: New sensors documentation looks clear and aligns with the PR objectives.
The two added sensors ("Core/Bridge connection status" and "Core attachment status") clearly convey the intended status information. They follow the established style of the existing sensor list.

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

54-54: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the parent-merged The parent PR has been merged already label Mar 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @MaestroOnICe 👍

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 merged commit 57e62c3 into home-assistant:next Mar 25, 2025
7 checks passed
@home-assistant home-assistant bot removed in-progress This PR/Issue is currently being worked on needs-rebase The PR has been branched of the wrong base branch or targets an incorrect target branch parent-merged The parent PR has been merged already labels Mar 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo next This PR goes into the next branch
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants