Adding copperBox to shielding #5
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A copper box has been added between the detector and the lead shielding as it is in the current IAXO setup.
Some comments about the changes:
The dimensions of the lead shaft solid have been modified in able to have the same dimensions of the copper box specifications:
350 mm in the long side and 200 mm in the short sides
thickness of top and bottom cover = 25 mm
thickness of the walls = 10 mm
To maintain the 20 cm thickness of the lead shielding it would be necessary to modify the SideXY parameter but when doing this and producing the geometry, a last layer of a few mm thick appears in the
ShieldingLayersconfiguration. That is why now SideXY=590 mm (as the original). I think this point needs revision @lobis