The origin-kube-rbac-proxy image is not compatible with the s390x

[ashokpariya0]

architecture. This change deploys an image that is compatible with amd64, arm and s390x architecture.

What this PR does / why we need it:
The origin-kube-rbac-proxy image is not compatible with the s390x
architecture. This change deploys an image that is compatible with
amd64, arm and s390x.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

This change addresses the compatibility issues with the origin-kube-rbac-proxy image on the s390x architecture. The updated deployment now uses an image that supports the amd64, arm and s390x architectures.
This enhancement ensures broader support and improved functionality across diverse environments.

[kubevirt-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign phoracek for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[kubevirt-bot]

Hi @ashokpariya0. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[oshoval]

/hold

thanks but this cant be done this way
we should do it correctly
image cant just be changed

[oshoval]

please open an issue instead and we will see what can be done and if we should support it upstream

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[ashokpariya0]

please open an issue instead and we will see what can be done and if we should support it upstream
Thanks, done that. Issue link: #1916

[oshoval]

thanks
lets continue there

/close

[oshoval]

maybe meanwhile in case you do cluster-sync you can use this env var locally ?

cluster-network-addons-operator/hack/generate-manifests.sh

Line 28 in 92344ad

--kube-rbac-proxy-image=${KUBE_RBAC_PROXY_IMAGE} \