Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[0.1] Cut 0.1.2 #3698

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Depends on #3697 for now

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Apr 1, 2025

👋 Thanks for assigning @valentinewallace as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

Comment on lines +28 to +29
model. Note that by default historical buckets are only decayed if no new
datapoints have been added for a channel for two weeks (#3562).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this new behavior after the fix? The commit message is pretty sparse on details bb468dd

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, that was existing (but is configurable)

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@valentinewallace
Copy link
Contributor

Ah benchmark is failing

@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ lightning-background-processor = { version = "0.1.0", path = "../lightning-backg

proptest = "1.0.0"
tokio = { version = "1.35", default-features = false, features = [ "rt-multi-thread", "time", "sync", "macros" ] }
parking_lot = { version = "0.12", default-features = false }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're willing to take on that dependency, why not just drop all the different cases and use parking_lot types everywhere? IIRC it would have additional benefits, including that it offers RwLockReadGuard variants that could potentially be held across await boundaries?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not super happy taking it as a dependency, no, just a dev one.

it offers RwLockReadGuard variants that could potentially be held across await boundaries?

We shouldn't be doing that to begin with...

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt force-pushed the 2025-04-0.1.2-relnotes branch from c0866f5 to 4b90166 Compare April 2, 2025 18:18
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.39%. Comparing base (79857d2) to head (4b90166).
Report is 3 commits behind head on 0.1.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              0.1    #3698      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.41%   88.39%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         149      149              
  Lines      113859   113859              
  Branches   113859   113859              
==========================================
- Hits       100663   100648      -15     
- Misses      10744    10753       +9     
- Partials     2452     2458       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@vincenzopalazzo vincenzopalazzo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGMT

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt merged commit 9069cc3 into lightningdevkit:0.1 Apr 2, 2025
19 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants