Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: drop relevance cutoff to 50 #175

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2024
Merged

chore: drop relevance cutoff to 50 #175

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2024

Conversation

ltalirz
Copy link
Owner

@ltalirz ltalirz commented Mar 6, 2024

Between April 10 2022 and April 10 2023, one code moved from the watchlist to the main list, otherwise the list remained unchanged (aside from updates of license/metadata).

The watchlist of engines with 50-100 citations contains 16 codes, while the watchlist of engines with 20-50 citations is 26 codes. Reiterating the thoughts from last year, I think we can afford to lower the relevance cutoff to 50 citations/year.

Even then I do not expect more than 1-3 new codes to be added per year. And for a number of the 16 codes (ACEMD, exciting, ONETEP, COLUMBUS, Fleur) we still have metadata from the original list.

Between April 10 2022 and April 10 2023, one code moved from the
watchlist to the main list, otherwise the list remained unchanged (aside
from updates of license/metadata).

The watchlist of engines with 50-100 citations contains 16 codes, while
the watchlist of engines with 20-50 citations is 26 codes. Reiterating
the thoughts from last year, I think we can afford to lower the
relevance cutoff to 50 citations/year.

Even then I do not expect more than 1-3 new codes to be added per year.
And for a number of the 16 codes (ACEMD, exciting, ONETEP, COLUMBUS,
Fleur) we still have metadata from the original list.
@ltalirz ltalirz linked an issue Mar 6, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@ltalirz ltalirz merged commit 73094cf into master Mar 6, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider lowering relevance criterion to 50 citations/year
1 participant