Update Python versions to adhere to SPEC 0

[adamltyson]

Description

Updates the Python versions to adhere to SPEC 0

• Bug fix
• Addition of a new feature
• Other

Why is this PR needed?
qt-niu is only available for SPEC 0 Python versions (3.11-3.13). This will break the conda-forge process when it's added as a dependency. Now seemed like a good idea to update the supported versions here, as (as far as I know) all the dependencies support 3.13.

In places where the version wasn't the oldest or newest, I've tried to update it in the same way, e.g. keeping the middle version.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.84%. Comparing base (115fd46) to head (e096a20).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #442   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.84%   99.84%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        1312     1312           
=======================================
  Hits         1310     1310           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[niksirbi]

Thank Adam, this closes #332.

I was meaning to do that for a while now, but last time I'd checked we were held back by numba. That doesn't seem to be the case any more.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[niksirbi]

I tried refreshing the CI, but it keeps getting stuck on "Waiting for status to be reported".
Any suggestions? Should I just override and merge it or do we have reasons to worry there may be an actual problem?

[lochhh]

I tried refreshing the CI, but it keeps getting stuck on "Waiting for status to be reported". Any suggestions? Should I just override and merge it or do we have reasons to worry there may be an actual problem?

How about recreating the PR?

[adamltyson]

I would just merge as-is. It will get tested with every new PR, and if any issues crop up they can be fixed.