Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(dlm): response the comments on #4151 #4165

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

guowl3
Copy link
Collaborator

@guowl3 guowl3 commented Jan 14, 2025

What type of PR is this?

type-feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Response the comments on #4151

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Additional documentation e.g., usage docs, etc.:


@guowl3 guowl3 added the type-feature The functionality to be implemented label Jan 14, 2025
@guowl3 guowl3 self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
@guowl3 guowl3 added this to the ODC 4.3.3 milestone Jan 14, 2025
@guowl3 guowl3 requested a review from PeachThinking as a code owner January 14, 2025 03:35
@guowl3 guowl3 changed the base branch from dev/4.3.x to dev/4.3.3 February 6, 2025 08:18
@@ -36,6 +38,13 @@ public class DefaultConnectionAdapter implements ConnectionAdapter {
*/
public <T extends CloudConnectionConfig> T adaptConfig(T connectionConfig) {
PreConditions.notNull(connectionConfig, "connectionConfig");
if (connectionConfig instanceof ConnectionConfig
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

type may be a common attribute for Connection config

Copy link
Collaborator

@LioRoger LioRoger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Collaborator

@MarkPotato777 MarkPotato777 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@guowl3 guowl3 merged commit 29f7146 into dev/4.3.3 Feb 7, 2025
7 checks passed
LioRoger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
* rsp comments

* rsp comments

* There is no need to obtain an endpoint for OSS

* rsp comments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-feature The functionality to be implemented
Projects
Status: Developed
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants