Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cherry-pick: Fixed typo in snapcraft.yaml #738

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2025

Conversation

matheushent
Copy link
Member

Original Commit: 0eb872f

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.00%. Comparing base (437fba5) to head (8d74001).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #738   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.00%   93.00%           
=======================================
  Files          88       88           
  Lines        4859     4859           
=======================================
  Hits         4519     4519           
  Misses        340      340           
Flag Coverage Δ
agent 94.45% <ø> (ø)
api 95.43% <ø> (ø)
cli 88.62% <ø> (ø)
core 96.31% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@jamesbeedy jamesbeedy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@matheushent matheushent merged commit 07a696c into main Mar 7, 2025
13 checks passed
@matheushent matheushent deleted the cherry-pick/port-0eb872f35-to-main branch March 7, 2025 13:30
jamesbeedy pushed a commit to jamesbeedy/jobbergate that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants