Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[L0] Refactoring of boolean event parameters #1600

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

winstonzhang-intel
Copy link
Contributor

@winstonzhang-intel winstonzhang-intel commented May 14, 2024

CI in LLVM/SYCL: intel/llvm#14536

@github-actions github-actions bot added the level-zero L0 adapter specific issues label May 14, 2024
@winstonzhang-intel winstonzhang-intel force-pushed the event-bool-refactoring branch 2 times, most recently from eafcd64 to 9679ead Compare May 20, 2024 15:26
@winstonzhang-intel winstonzhang-intel marked this pull request as ready for review May 21, 2024 16:20
@winstonzhang-intel winstonzhang-intel requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2024 16:20
Copy link
Contributor

@nrspruit nrspruit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, I found one typo in the flag checks, please fix that and verify that there are not others I missed, thanks!

source/adapters/level_zero/context.hpp Show resolved Hide resolved
source/adapters/level_zero/common.hpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/adapters/level_zero/context.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nrspruit nrspruit self-requested a review July 1, 2024 20:14
@nrspruit nrspruit dismissed their stale review July 1, 2024 20:14

no longer relevant.

@nrspruit
Copy link
Contributor

nrspruit commented Jul 3, 2024

Hello @winstonzhang-intel ,

Please rebase since there are L0 CTS failures here: https://github.com/oneapi-src/unified-runtime/actions/runs/9651142091/job/26618341665?pr=1600.

@winstonzhang-intel winstonzhang-intel force-pushed the event-bool-refactoring branch 2 times, most recently from 38b0489 to e1d74f2 Compare July 11, 2024 14:29
winstonzhang-intel added a commit to winstonzhang-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
winstonzhang-intel added a commit to winstonzhang-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@nrspruit nrspruit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nrspruit nrspruit added the ready to merge Added to PR's which are ready to merge label Sep 13, 2024
@omarahmed1111
Copy link
Contributor

@winstonzhang-intel Please make sure that intel/llvm#14536 is updated and passing CI, so we could merge this. Thanks!

@omarahmed1111 omarahmed1111 removed the ready to merge Added to PR's which are ready to merge label Sep 18, 2024
@omarahmed1111
Copy link
Contributor

I removed the ready to merge label temporarily until the intel/llvm side is updated and passing tests. Please readd it when intel/llvm PR is updated.

winstonzhang-intel added a commit to winstonzhang-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
winstonzhang-intel added a commit to winstonzhang-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
@winstonzhang-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

I removed the ready to merge label temporarily until the intel/llvm side is updated and passing tests. Please readd it when intel/llvm PR is updated.

I removed the ready to merge label temporarily until the intel/llvm side is updated and passing tests. Please readd it when intel/llvm PR is updated.

Working on rebasing against latest phase 2 of counterbased patch.

winstonzhang-intel added a commit to winstonzhang-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
level-zero L0 adapter specific issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants