Merge jdk17u:jdk-17.0.12+7 #157
Conversation
…ing deoptimization Reviewed-by: kvn Backport-of: 52523d3
…e not necessarily sensitive" Reviewed-by: lucy
…cies Reviewed-by: phh Backport-of: 12b89cd
…build Backport-of: 9ee9f28
Reviewed-by: lucy Backport-of: 4296ddfc6336f062e92fdfdc3b41ca20da26a126
…e a programmatically associated name Reviewed-by: hannesw Backport-of: 783ae56
8270018: Add scoped object for g1 young gc JFR notification Reviewed-by: phh Backport-of: c93204c
Reviewed-by: phh Backport-of: aba1933
…r Ampere CPUs Reviewed-by: shade Backport-of: 9936aee
…ient tests Reviewed-by: mbaesken Backport-of: 646b666
…because A blue ball icon is added outside of the system tray Backport-of: 5a988a5
Reviewed-by: rrich Backport-of: f11e099
…object_starts_in_range Reviewed-by: phh, zgu Backport-of: 496baad
Backport-of: ff5d417
…rror. Can't find library: /open/test/jdk/java/awt/regtesthelpers" after JDK-8316053 Backport-of: e4803e0
…expected Region instead of Loop Backport-of: 9f0e7da
…allel Reviewed-by: phh, zgu Backport-of: 22b93a3
…st/jdk/jdk/internal/loader Backport-of: 57fc9a3
…ntOS Linux release 8.5.2111 and Fedora 27 Backport-of: 5281499
Backport-of: 6697160
…t arrays in old gen Reviewed-by: phh Backport-of: 4bfe226
Reviewed-by: phh Backport-of: 14eb5ad
…fail in Xcomp with out of expected range Backport-of: 91d8dac
8290885: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java fail: More or fewer pipes than expected Reviewed-by: shade Backport-of: 620c8a0
Backport-of: d3df3eb
Backport-of: b9ca2532287b02388cd6f9e69b02a86713fc5b88
Reviewed-by: mdoerr Backport-of: 8e1d2b0
Reviewed-by: mbalao, evergizova Backport-of: ab2532d858de8d855529b6f2491f94c499f94009
Reviewed-by: yan, mbalao Backport-of: f7857e9106841f402ade56bad0338fc53159fb9a
Reviewed-by: mbalao Backport-of: da06689bf6fde7b6dd8efc2f0c39fc95adcdb69d
Reviewed-by: mbalao Backport-of: 1401634b21b76db90291011bcae68c461742e687
Reviewed-by: mbaesken Backport-of: cf20364d0cb3f182880ee91c7fb023615e27becf
Reviewed-by: mbalao Backport-of: 895893f2fbf1c521d4a263d505f0ecbda8d2eeea
Reviewed-by: mbalao Backport-of: 1a5a44019871c411148ca85d0491cc68d2256e4e
Backport-of: eb1f33f525846e6020185cbc5d6e48cbc760dbb2
…with MaxL/MinL Reviewed-by: roland Backport-of: cc894d8
Backport-of: 72eed2f709caa48c82f58fe75c7e94d2c45947e1
…release 17.0.12 Reviewed-by: mbaesken
Added tag jdk-17.0.12+7 for changeset 833f65e
|
👋 Welcome back rvansa! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@rvansa This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
openjdk
bot
added
ready
Webrevs |
|
I compared changes with jdk-17.0.12+7, there are only CRaC related ones. So LGTM. Thank you! |
|
@rvansa This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
3 similar comments
|
@rvansa This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
@rvansa This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
@rvansa This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
There were no substantial conflicts in the merge.
Progress
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/crac.git pull/157/head:pull/157$ git checkout pull/157Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/157$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/crac.git pull/157/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 157View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 157Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/crac/pull/157.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment