Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Promote OnClusterBuild featuregate to default #2192

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

Final step to GA On Cluster Layering, after
openshift/machine-config-operator#4756 and #2134

See also updated enhancement: openshift/enhancements#1515

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Hello @yuqi-zhang! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: yuqi-zhang
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign joelspeed for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

Currently for testing

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 5, 2025
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Given the absence of automated testing reporting into component readiness, there is a want to make an exception for this feature and promote within 4.19 based on QE testing alone

Could we please get a write up on this PR detailing the existing testing that QE have been completing, with links to historical pass rates where available

I would also appreciate if we can link out to any trackers for the future automated regression testing that's in the pipeline

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Verify failure in schema checker is an issue with the alpha API, we will override that issue

/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift
/test minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang @cheesesashimi The failures in the minor upgrade look like they are legitimate, can you please investigate?

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang force-pushed the promote-onclusterbuild-featuregate branch from 244a7dc to c939ea4 Compare March 21, 2025 01:22
@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

yuqi-zhang commented Mar 21, 2025

Rebased on master just in case. It looks like in the failed upgrade, the MCO hasn't started upgrade yet (?) and the operator logs are failing on:

E0320 14:53:14.386733       1 reflector.go:158] "Unhandled Error" err="github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pkg/operator/operator.go:390: Failed to watch *v1alpha1.MachineOSConfig: failed to list *v1alpha1.MachineOSConfig: the server could not find the requested resource (get machineosconfigs.machineconfiguration.openshift.io)"

checking if that was caused by outdated CRDs.

The kube-rbac-proxy failures should also be old, since the pods should have the proper SCC labels now

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 21, 2025

@yuqi-zhang: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview c939ea4 link true /test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview c939ea4 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion c939ea4 link true /test verify-feature-promotion
ci/prow/verify-crd-schema c939ea4 link true /test verify-crd-schema
ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor c939ea4 link true /test minor-e2e-upgrade-minor
ci/prow/e2e-azure c939ea4 link false /test e2e-azure
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift c939ea4 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants