Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DNM] Support TDX confidentialInstanceTypes #2193

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bgartzi
Copy link

@bgartzi bgartzi commented Feb 4, 2025

Please, ignore. Do not merge. This is some work in progress.

GCP compute API permits not only specifying whether a machine has to be
confidential or not, but also determining the technology backing that
up see [0]. This commit adds an api parameter into the
GCPMachineProviderSpec to support that.

That way, we should be able to configure SEV_SNP machines as well as SEV
machines as before.

[0] https://cloud.google.com/confidential-computing/confidential-vm/docs/supported-configurations
GCP supports sev, sev-snp and tdx confidentialInstanceTypes. However,
the openshift API only supported sev and sev-snp. Support tdx machine
configuration also.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 4, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from bparees and JoelSpeed February 4, 2025 08:12
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bgartzi
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sjenning for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Hello @bgartzi! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Feb 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Hi @bgartzi. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@bgartzi
Copy link
Author

bgartzi commented Feb 4, 2025

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant