Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Replace readyz sidecar container with etcds own probes #1321

Conversation

jubittajohn
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 19, 2024
@jubittajohn jubittajohn changed the title WIP: Replaced readyz sidecar container with etcds own probes WIP: Replace readyz sidecar container with etcds own probes Aug 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jubittajohn
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign deads2k for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jubittajohn jubittajohn force-pushed the remove-readyz-sidecar-container branch from 9e5ac8c to 2cf5c88 Compare August 20, 2024 02:46
port: 9980
path: readyz
port: 2379
path: readyz?exclude=data_corruption&exclude=linearized_read
scheme: HTTPS
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's failing on:

{"level":"warn","ts":"2024-08-20T03:55:49.588638Z","caller":"embed/config_logging.go:169","msg":"rejected connection","remote-addr":"10.0.36.39:41140","server-name":"","error":"tls: client didn't provide a certificate"}

since we can't supply mTLS certs in the probe configs, we could try to split the http server out with the etcd args:

--listen-client-http-urls=

dunno if we can simply take on the ":2378" port for starters and then see if we still need some form of mTLS along with it.

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor

(just checking something for another ticket - don't be confused)

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-etcd-recovery

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2024

@tjungblu: Overrode contexts on behalf of tjungblu: ci/prow/e2e-aws-etcd-recovery

In response to this:

(just checking something for another ticket - don't be confused)

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-etcd-recovery

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2024

@jubittajohn: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-upgrade 2cf5c88 link true /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-operator 2cf5c88 link true /test e2e-operator
ci/prow/e2e-operator-fips 2cf5c88 link false /test e2e-operator-fips
ci/prow/e2e-aws-etcd-certrotation 2cf5c88 link false /test e2e-aws-etcd-certrotation
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn 2cf5c88 link true /test e2e-agnostic-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling 2cf5c88 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial 2cf5c88 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ovn-sno-cert-rotation-shutdown 2cf5c88 link false /test e2e-metal-ovn-sno-cert-rotation-shutdown
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ovn-ha-cert-rotation-shutdown 2cf5c88 link false /test e2e-metal-ovn-ha-cert-rotation-shutdown
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node 2cf5c88 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 31, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor

tjungblu commented Sep 3, 2024

let's shelve this until we have a solution for
etcd-io/etcd#18477

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Sep 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 3, 2024

@tjungblu: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

let's shelve this until we have a solution for
etcd-io/etcd#18477

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants