feat(dropdown): [dropdown,select,slider] Adapt to xdesign themes #2108
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve various modifications across multiple Vue components and stylesheets. Key updates include the removal of visual dividers in dropdown menus, enhancements to dropdown components with new attributes, and improvements to the styling of dropdown elements. Additional changes modernize input handling in the slider component, streamline function signatures, and introduce complex hierarchical structures in dropdowns. These adjustments aim to refine the user interface and improve component functionality. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
removed
bug
MomoPoppy
changed the title
|
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (22)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level-composition-api.vue (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level.vue (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple-composition-api.vue (4 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/dropdown/index.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/dropdown/vars.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/aurora-theme.js (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/vars.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/select/index.less (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/slider/index.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/slider/vars.less (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/dropdown/src/pc.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/select/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/select/src/pc.vue (2 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/slider/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/slider/src/pc.vue (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon-composition-api.vue
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon.vue
- packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/vars.less
Additional comments not posted (39)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable-composition-api.vue (1)
2-2: LGTM!The addition of the
:show-input="true"andunit="%"props to the<tiny-slider>component is a great enhancement. It improves the component's functionality by allowing users to see and input values directly, and clarifies that the slider's value is in percentage.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable.vue (1)
2-2: LGTM!The code changes look good:
- The
:show-input="true"prop allows displaying an input field alongside the slider, enabling users to see and potentially modify the slider's value directly.- The
unit="%"prop specifies that the value displayed should be represented as a percentage.These changes enhance the user interface by providing more context and interactivity, even while the slider remains disabled.
packages/vue/src/slider/package.json (1)
21-22: LGTM! The new dependency could enhance the slider's functionality.The addition of the
@opentiny/vue-inputdependency suggests that the slider component may now utilize input features from this package. This change could enable more complex interactions or integrations with input elements, potentially improving the slider's overall capability while preserving its core functionality.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border-composition-api.vue (1)
21-21: LGTM!The addition of the
type="primary"attribute to the<tiny-dropdown>component is a valid enhancement to its styling options. It allows the dropdown to adopt a primary theme, which is consistent with the existingborderandroundattributes.The change appears to be properly implemented and does not introduce any apparent issues.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border.vue (1)
21-21: LGTM!The addition of the
type="primary"attribute to the<tiny-dropdown>component is a valid enhancement that will modify the visual styling of the dropdown to adopt a primary theme or style. This change is consistent with the existingborderandroundattributes and does not introduce any syntax errors or logical issues.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level-composition-api.vue (3)
13-33: LGTM!The addition of new
tiny-dropdowninstances with varying configurations enhances the dropdown's functionality and demonstrates different usage scenarios. The changes are well-structured and consistent with the existing code.
65-83: Looks good!The addition of the
options1data structure is a valid enhancement to support the new dropdown instances in the template. The structure follows the expected format and provides a more complex hierarchy of options, including nested children and disabled states.
Line range hint
1-134: Overall, the changes in this file are well-implemented and enhance the dropdown component's functionality.Positive aspects:
- The addition of new dropdown instances with varying configurations demonstrates the flexibility and extensibility of the component.
- The introduction of the
options1data structure provides a more complex hierarchy of options, enabling multi-level dropdown menus.- The code follows a modular and reusable structure, making it easy to customize and extend the dropdown component.
- The use of composition API and reactive data structures aligns with Vue 3 best practices and promotes a more maintainable codebase.
- The code adheres to a consistent naming convention and coding style, enhancing readability and maintainability.
No major issues or concerns were identified during the review. Great job!
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level.vue (6)
5-11: LGTM!The code segment correctly demonstrates the usage of the
tiny-dropdowncomponent with theoptionsproperty to define children. The changes are valid and can be approved.
12-32: LGTM!The code segments correctly demonstrate the usage of the
tiny-dropdowncomponent with theoptions1data structure and additional attributes such asborderandtype. The changes are valid and can be approved.
69-87: LGTM!The
options1data structure is correctly defined with a hierarchical menu containing labels and nested children. It can be used with thetiny-dropdowncomponent as demonstrated in the examples. The changes are valid and can be approved.
Line range hint
1-4:
Line range hint
35-68:
Line range hint
88-129:packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue (1)
16-16: LGTM!The conditional application of the
v-auto-tipdirective based on the truthiness ofgetTipis a good enhancement. It prevents unnecessary tooltip behavior when no tooltip content is available, improving the component's flexibility.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple-composition-api.vue (7)
5-14: LGTM!The changes enhance the multi-select dropdown functionality by:
- Adding the
searchableattribute to allow users to search through options.- Binding
disabledandrequiredattributes to represent disabled and required options.The changes are consistent with the PR objectives and AI-generated summary.
40-40: LGTM!The changes introduce a new scenario for limiting the number of options that can be selected in the multi-select dropdown by adding the
multiple-limitandshow-limit-textattributes to thetiny-selectcomponent.The changes are consistent with the PR objectives and AI-generated summary.
54-86: LGTM!The changes introduce several new scenarios for the multi-select dropdown, including:
- Disabled state
- Display-only mode
- Showing all text tags
- Various configurations for tag display (collapsed, hover-expand, click-expand)
These changes significantly expand the component's capabilities and are consistent with the PR objectives and AI-generated summary.
96-97: LGTM!The changes to the
options1data structure, which includedisabledandrequiredproperties for specific options, are consistent with the alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities mentioned in the AI-generated summary.These changes support the new functionalities introduced in the previous code segments.
110-110: LGTM!The change to the
options2data structure, which includes therequiredproperty for a specific option, is consistent with the alterations to the declarations of exported or public entities mentioned in the AI-generated summary.This change supports the new functionalities introduced in the previous code segments.
117-117: LGTM!The initialization of the new reactive variable
value3with an array of two options supports the new scenarios introduced in the previous code segments.
119-119: LGTM!The initialization of the new reactive variable
value5with an array of all available options supports the new scenarios introduced in the previous code segments, which require a pre-selected set of options.packages/theme/src/dropdown/vars.less (5)
17-17: LGTM!Increasing the width of the dropdown trigger icon when only an SVG is present from
var(--ti-common-size-4x)tovar(--ti-common-size-6x)enhances the visual prominence of the icon. The change looks good.
19-19: LGTM!Increasing the height of the dropdown trigger icon when only an SVG is present from
var(--ti-common-size-4x)tovar(--ti-common-size-6x)enhances the visual prominence of the icon. The change looks good.
21-21: LGTM!Modifying the hover background color for the dropdown trigger icon when only an SVG is present from
rgba(0,0,0,0.05)tovar(--ti-common-color-bg-normal)improves the visual consistency with other UI elements. The change looks good.
73-73: LGTM!Introducing a new property
--ti-dropdown-suffix-icon-colorto define the default color for the dropdown icon associated with buttons enhances the customization and visual feedback for users interacting with dropdowns. The change looks good.
75-75: LGTM!Introducing a new property
--ti-dropdown-suffix-icon-color-hoverto define the hover color for the dropdown icon associated with buttons enhances the customization and visual feedback for users interacting with dropdowns. The change looks good.packages/theme/src/slider/vars.less (1)
98-99: LGTM!The new CSS variable
--ti-slider-input-unit-text-color-disabledis a good addition to improve the styling options for the slider component's disabled state. The variable name follows the existing naming convention, and the value is set using a common color variable, ensuring consistency with the overall theme.packages/theme/src/dropdown/index.less (2)
Line range hint
47-52: LGTM!The hover style for the dropdown trigger is correctly implemented and improves the user experience by providing visual feedback. The code follows the existing style and does not introduce any issues.
186-201: LGTM!The styles for the SVG icon within the dropdown suffix are correctly implemented and improve the visual consistency of the component. The code follows the existing style and does not introduce any issues.
packages/vue/src/slider/src/pc.vue (3)
82-94: LGTM!The changes enhance the modularity and maintainability of the code by replacing the standard HTML input element with a custom
tiny-inputcomponent for the single slider configuration. Thetiny-inputcomponent usesv-modelfor two-way data binding withstate.slotValueand maintains the same event handlers for focus, blur, and input events, ensuring that the slider's input behavior remains consistent. The conditional class binding on the input container improves the visual feedback for disabled states.
97-113: LGTM!The changes enhance the modularity and maintainability of the code by replacing the standard HTML input elements with custom
tiny-inputcomponents for the double slider configuration. Thetiny-inputcomponents usev-modelfor two-way data binding withstate.slotValue[0]andstate.slotValue[1]respectively and maintain the same event handlers for focus, blur, and input events, ensuring that the slider's input behavior remains consistent for the double slider configuration.
125-125: LGTM!The import statement for the
tiny-inputcomponent has been added, and it has been registered asTinyInputin the component's declaration. These changes are necessary for using thetiny-inputcomponent in the template and are consistent with the list of alterations provided in the AI-generated summary.Also applies to: 149-151
packages/vue/src/dropdown/src/pc.vue (1)
170-170: LGTM!The addition of the
typeprop to thetiny-buttoncomponent is a good change. It allows configuring the type/style of the dropdown button, improving the flexibility and reusability of the component. The change is consistent with the component's props declaration and does not introduce any correctness, security, or performance issues.packages/theme/src/slider/index.less (2)
235-235: Approve the change to use flexbox layout for the slider input.The modification of the
displayproperty frominline-blocktoflexfor the&__inputclass is a good choice. Flexbox layout offers several advantages overinline-block, such as:
- Easier alignment and distribution of child elements using properties like
justify-contentandalign-items.- More flexible sizing options with the
flexproperty to control how elements grow or shrink.- Simplified spacing and gap management between elements using the
gapproperty.This change will provide more control over the layout and alignment of the input elements within the slider, leading to a more flexible and maintainable component.
266-269: Approve the addition of the disabled state style for the slider input unit text.The new style rule for the
&.is-disabledstate of the input, which changes the color of the associated unit text (.@{slider-prefix-cls}__input__unit) to a disabled color specified by the variablevar(--ti-slider-input-unit-text-color-disabled), is a valuable addition to the slider component. This change provides several benefits:
- Enhanced visual feedback: By changing the color of the unit text when the input is disabled, users can quickly identify that the input is not interactive, improving the overall user experience.
- Consistency: Using a CSS variable for the disabled color ensures that the disabled state is consistent across the component and can be easily customized if needed.
- Accessibility: Clear visual indicators for disabled elements are important for accessibility, as they help users with various abilities understand the state of the interface.
This addition aligns with best practices for providing visual feedback and enhancing the usability of the slider component.
packages/theme/src/select/index.less (1)
315-320: LGTM!The added styles for
spanelements within the@{select-prefix-cls}__tagsclass, when the select component is in a disabled state and hovered over, will improve the layout and presentation of tags. This change enhances the user experience by ensuring better alignment and spacing of the tags.packages/vue/src/select/src/pc.vue (2)
155-155: LGTM!The additional class binding improves the component's responsiveness to its hidden and disabled states.
230-230: LGTM!The formatting adjustment improves code readability without affecting functionality.
| @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ export const tinySelectDropdownAuroraTheme = { | |||
| 'ti-select-dropdown-padding-bottom': 'var(--ti-common-space-0)', | |||
| 'ti-select-dropdown-padding-top': 'var(--ti-common-space-0)', | |||
| 'ti-select-dropdown-max-height': '188px', | |||
| 'ti-select-dropdown-box-shadow': '0 0 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.3)', // 没有common 变量 | |||
| 'ti-select-dropdown-box-shadow': 'var(--ti-common-shadow-2-down)', // 没有common 变量 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The variable --ti-common-shadow-2-down is defined; update or remove the comment.
The variable --ti-common-shadow-2-down is defined in the codebase, specifically in the following files:
packages/theme/src/base/old-basic-vars.lesspackages/theme/src/base/basic-var.less
The comment suggesting the absence of this variable is incorrect and should be updated or removed to avoid confusion.
Analysis chain
Verify the existence of the referenced variable and update the comment accordingly.
Using a variable for the box shadow value is a good practice for maintaining consistency across the theme. However, the comment suggests that the referenced variable --ti-common-shadow-2-down may not exist.
Run the following script to verify if the variable is defined:
If the variable is found to be defined, consider removing or updating the comment to avoid confusion.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the variable `--ti-common-shadow-2-down` is defined.
# Test: Search for the variable definition.
rg --type css $'--ti-common-shadow-2-down:'
Length of output: 471
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the variable `--ti-common-shadow-2-down` is defined.
# Test: Search for the variable definition.
rg --type css '--ti-common-shadow-2-down:'
Length of output: 471
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the variable `--ti-common-shadow-2-down` is defined.
# Test: Search for the variable definition across all files.
rg '--ti-common-shadow-2-down:'
Length of output: 460
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the variable `--ti-common-shadow-2-down` is defined.
# Test: Search for the variable definition across all files.
rg '\-\-ti-common-shadow-2-down:'
Length of output: 262
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable.vue (1)
2-2: LGTM! Consider adding a comment to explain thedisabledattribute.The changes to the
<tiny-slider>component look good and align with the PR objective of adapting the slider to xdesign themes and improving the user interface. The addition of:show-input="true"andunit="%"props enhances the clarity and interactivity of the slider, even in a disabled state.Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of the
disabledattribute, as it may not be immediately clear why the slider is disabled but still allows input.<!-- The slider is disabled to prevent user interaction, but the input field is displayed to allow users to see and potentially modify the value directly. --> <tiny-slider v-model="value" disabled :show-input="true" unit="%"></tiny-slider>examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple-composition-api.vue (2)
Line range hint
5-86: Add tests for the new scenarios to ensure stability and reliability.The addition of multiple new scenarios significantly improves the usability and flexibility of the
tiny-selectcomponent, making it more adaptable to various use cases. However, I noticed that tests for these changes have not been added, as indicated in the PR checklist.It's crucial to ensure that the new scenarios are thoroughly tested to maintain the stability and reliability of the component and prevent potential bugs or regressions in the future.
Do you want me to generate the test code for the new scenarios or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
5-86: Update the documentation to reflect the new scenarios and provide clear guidance.The addition of multiple new scenarios significantly improves the usability and flexibility of the
tiny-selectcomponent, making it more adaptable to various use cases. However, I noticed that the documentation has not been updated to reflect these changes, as indicated in the PR checklist.It's crucial to ensure that the documentation is updated to provide clear guidance on how to use the new scenarios effectively and prevent confusion or difficulty in understanding the component's capabilities.
Do you want me to update the documentation for the new scenarios or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (22)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level-composition-api.vue (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level.vue (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple-composition-api.vue (4 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/dropdown/index.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/dropdown/vars.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/aurora-theme.js (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/vars.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/select/index.less (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/slider/index.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/slider/vars.less (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/dropdown/src/pc.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/select/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/select/src/pc.vue (2 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/slider/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/slider/src/pc.vue (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon-composition-api.vue
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon.vue
- packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/vars.less
Additional comments not posted (39)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable-composition-api.vue (1)
2-2: Verify the intended behavior when the slider is disabled.The addition of
:show-input="true"andunit="%"props enhances the user interface by displaying an input field and representing the value as a percentage. This aligns with the PR objectives of adapting the slider to xdesign themes and improving the user experience.However, please verify if allowing users to modify the value while the slider is disabled is the intended behavior. If not, consider adding the
readonlyattribute to the input field to prevent modifications when the slider is disabled.packages/vue/src/slider/package.json (1)
21-22: LGTM!The addition of the
@opentiny/vue-inputdependency to thepackage.jsonfile is a valid change that aligns with the PR objective of adapting the slider component to xdesign themes. Theworkspace:~version specifier ensures compatibility within the current workspace.This change suggests that the slider component may now leverage functionality provided by the
@opentiny/vue-inputpackage, potentially enhancing its input-related capabilities while adhering to the xdesign themes.The modification does not introduce any issues or inconsistencies within the
package.jsonfile.packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/aurora-theme.js (1)
5-5: Verify the variable usage and update the comment.The change to use a common variable for the box shadow is a good practice to maintain consistency across the theme. However, please verify that the variable
--ti-common-shadow-2-downis defined and yields the intended visual result.Run the following script to verify the variable definition:
Also, consider removing the comment or translating it to English for better collaboration:
- 'ti-select-dropdown-box-shadow': 'var(--ti-common-shadow-2-down)', // 没有common 变量 + 'ti-select-dropdown-box-shadow': 'var(--ti-common-shadow-2-down)',examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border-composition-api.vue (1)
21-21: LGTM!The addition of the
type="primary"attribute to the<tiny-dropdown>component aligns with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown to xdesign themes. The change is localized and does not introduce any apparent issues or side effects.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border.vue (1)
21-21: LGTM!The addition of the
type="primary"attribute to the<tiny-dropdown>component is a valid change that aligns with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown to xdesign themes. This change is localized and does not have any unintended consequences on the rest of the codebase.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level-composition-api.vue (2)
13-33: LGTM!The new instances of the
tiny-dropdowncomponent are implemented correctly, utilizing theoptions1data structure for the multi-level dropdown menu. The addition of theborderandtypeattributes enhances the visual variations of the dropdown component. The code changes are consistent with the existing implementation and do not introduce any issues.
65-83: Looks good!The new reactive data structure
options1is implemented correctly, following the same structure as the existingoptionsdata. The inclusion of nested children and disabled options enhances the dropdown's functionality and user experience. The code changes are consistent with the existing implementation and do not introduce any issues.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level.vue (5)
5-11: LGTM!The changes introduce a new scenario demonstrating the usage of the
optionsproperty to define children for thetiny-dropdowncomponent. The code is consistent with the existing structure and conventions, and it aligns with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown component to xdesign themes.
12-32: LGTM!The changes introduce three new instances of the
tiny-dropdowncomponent with various configurations, demonstrating the usage of theoptions1data structure to define children. The instances showcase variations with and without borders, as well as a dropdown with a primary type.The code is consistent with the existing structure and conventions, and it aligns with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown component to xdesign themes. The changes enhance the demonstration of the dropdown component's capabilities and flexibility.
69-87: LGTM!The changes introduce a new data structure named
options1in the exported default object. The structure includes a list of items, some of which have nested children and disabled states. Theoptions1data structure is used in the new dropdown instances to demonstrate the component's capabilities.The code is consistent with the existing structure and conventions, and it aligns with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown component to xdesign themes.
Line range hint
1-1: AI-generated summary looks good!The AI-generated summary accurately captures the essence of the changes made in the file. It mentions the addition of new dropdown instances, the usage of the
options1data structure, and highlights the demonstration of the dropdown component's flexibility and capabilities.The summary is consistent with the code changes and does not contain any inconsistencies or discrepancies.
Line range hint
1-1: Code changes align with PR objectives, but tests and documentation are missing.The code changes in the file align with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown component to xdesign themes. The addition of new dropdown instances and the usage of the
options1data structure demonstrate the component's flexibility and compatibility with xdesign themes.However, as noted in the PR objectives, tests for the changes have not been added, and documentation has not been updated. To ensure the maintainability and reliability of the code, it is recommended to:
Add tests to cover the new dropdown instances and the usage of the
options1data structure. This will help catch any potential issues and ensure the component behaves as expected.Update the documentation to reflect the changes made in this PR. This will help other developers understand how to use the adapted dropdown component and its various configurations.
Addressing these points will improve the overall quality and completeness of the PR.
Do you want me to generate the missing tests or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue (1)
16-16: LGTM!The conditional assignment of the
v-auto-tipdirective based on the truthiness ofgetTipis a good approach. It ensures that the tooltip is only activated whengetTipis defined, preventing unnecessary tooltips whengetTipis not available. The change aligns with the expected behavior described in the AI-generated summary.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple-composition-api.vue (9)
5-14: LGTM!The enhancements to the
tiny-selectandtiny-optioncomponents align with the PR objective and improve the user experience. The changes are implemented correctly.
26-27: LGTM!The enhancements to the
tiny-optioncomponent align with the PR objective and improve the user experience. The changes are implemented correctly.
40-40: LGTM!The enhancement to the
tiny-selectcomponent aligns with the PR objective and improves the user experience. The change is implemented correctly.
48-51: LGTM!The enhancements to the
tiny-selectcomponent align with the PR objective and allow customization of the dropdown icon and style. The changes are implemented correctly.
54-86: LGTM!The addition of multiple new scenarios demonstrates the enhanced usability and flexibility of the
tiny-selectcomponent, aligning with the PR objective. The changes are implemented correctly and make the component more adaptable to various use cases.
96-97: LGTM!The modifications to the
options1data structure align with the PR objective and enhance the user experience by indicating mandatory or unavailable options. The changes are implemented correctly.
110-110: LGTM!The modification to the
options2data structure aligns with the PR objective and enhances the user experience by indicating a mandatory option. The change is implemented correctly.
117-117: LGTM!The initialization of
value3with selected options aligns with the PR objective and ensures that the component behaves as expected with the new configurations. The change is implemented correctly.
119-119: LGTM!The initialization of
value5with a broader selection of options aligns with the PR objective and ensures that the component behaves as expected with the new configurations. The change is implemented correctly.packages/theme/src/dropdown/vars.less (4)
17-17: LGTM!The change to increase the width of the dropdown trigger when it only contains an SVG icon is consistent with the PR objective and looks good.
19-19: LGTM!The change to increase the height of the dropdown trigger when it only contains an SVG icon is consistent with the PR objective and looks good.
21-21: LGTM!The change to modify the hover background color for the SVG-only trigger to a normal background color is consistent with the PR objective and looks good.
72-75: LGTM!The introduction of the new CSS variables
--ti-dropdown-suffix-icon-colorand--ti-dropdown-suffix-icon-color-hoverto define the default icon color and hover color for the dropdown suffix icon is consistent with the PR objective and looks good.packages/theme/src/slider/vars.less (1)
98-99: LGTM!The new CSS variable
--ti-slider-input-unit-text-color-disabledis a great addition to improve the accessibility and usability of the slider component. The variable name follows the naming convention used in the file, and the value is set consistently with other color variables.packages/theme/src/dropdown/index.less (1)
186-201: LGTM!The new styles for the
.tiny-button--defaultclass within the dropdown component look good. The hover effect on the SVG icon improves the visual feedback and interactivity of the dropdown button. The changes are consistent with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown component to xdesign themes and align well with the existing code patterns and naming conventions.packages/vue/src/slider/src/pc.vue (4)
82-82: LGTM!The change improves the visual feedback for disabled states by conditionally applying the
is-disabledclass based on thestate.disabledproperty. This is consistent with the AI-generated summary.
84-94: LGTM!The changes enhance the component's functionality by integrating the custom
<tiny-input>component for handling slider input values whenstate.isDoubleis false. Thev-modeldirective is used to bind the input value directly tostate.slotValue, ensuring two-way data binding. The input handling methods are preserved, maintaining the existing event handling logic while transitioning to the new input component. These changes are consistent with the AI-generated summary.
97-113: LGTM!The changes enhance the component's functionality by integrating the custom
<tiny-input>components for handling slider input values whenstate.isDoubleis true. Thev-modeldirective is used to bind the input values directly tostate.slotValue[0]andstate.slotValue[1], ensuring two-way data binding. The input handling methods are preserved, maintaining the existing event handling logic while transitioning to the new input components. These changes are consistent with the AI-generated summary.
Line range hint
125-151: LGTM!The changes import the
Inputcomponent from@opentiny/vue-inputand register it asTinyInputin the component'scomponentsoption. This is consistent with the AI-generated summary and the list of alterations. The component registration forTinyInputindicates that the new input component is now part of the component's public API, and the import and registration of theInputcomponent are necessary for using the<tiny-input>component in the template.packages/vue/src/dropdown/src/pc.vue (1)
Line range hint
170-174: LGTM!The addition of the
typeprop to thetiny-buttoncomponent is consistent with the list of alterations and the AI-generated summary. This change enhances the flexibility of the dropdown component by allowing it to adapt its behavior or appearance based on the specified type. The code changes look good and do not introduce any issues or inconsistencies.packages/theme/src/slider/index.less (2)
235-235: LGTM!The change from
inline-blocktoflexfor the&__inputclass is a good improvement. It allows for better control over the layout and alignment of the slider input and its associated elements. Flexbox layout is generally more flexible and powerful compared toinline-block, especially when it comes to aligning and distributing space among child elements. This change aligns with the overall goal of adapting the slider component to the xdesign themes and improving the user interface.
266-269: LGTM!Adding a specific style for the disabled state of the slider input unit is a good practice. It enhances the visual feedback for users when the slider input is not interactive. Changing the text color to a disabled state color improves accessibility and user experience by clearly indicating the disabled state of the slider input. This addition aligns with the overall goal of adapting the slider component to the xdesign themes and improving the user interface.
packages/vue/src/select/src/index.ts (1)
248-248: Verify if the removal of the default dropdown icon is intentional.The change simplifies the default state of the
dropdownIconprop by removing the dependency on theIconChevronDownfunction, allowing developers to define their own icons. However, this raises potential concerns regarding the visual consistency of the dropdown component, as it may now appear without any icon if not specified.Please confirm if the removal of the default icon is intentional and aligns with the design requirements. If visual consistency is a priority, consider adding a default icon.
packages/theme/src/select/index.less (1)
315-320: LGTM!The changes align with the PR objectives of adapting the select component to xdesign themes. The new styles for the inner
spanelements when the select is disabled and hovered will improve the visual representation and layout of tags, ensuring consistent spacing and alignment.packages/vue/src/select/src/pc.vue (2)
155-155: LGTM!The expanded condition for the
is-hiddenclass improves the component's visual representation by considering both theisHiddenandisDisabledstates.
230-230: LGTM!The removal of the semicolon is a minor formatting change that improves code cleanliness without altering functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/vue/src/dropdown/src/pc.vue (1)
170-170: LGTM! Consider adding a default value for thetypeprop.The addition of the
typeprop enhances the flexibility and configurability of the dropdown component. It allows developers to specify different types of triggers based on their requirements. The change does not alter existing functionality but expands the component's capabilities.Consider adding a default value for the
typeprop to provide a sensible default behavior when the prop is not explicitly set by the parent component. For example:type: { type: String, default: 'default' }Don't forget to update the component's documentation to reflect the new
typeprop, including its purpose, accepted values, and default value if applicable. This will help developers understand how to utilize this new feature effectively.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (22)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level-composition-api.vue (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level.vue (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple-composition-api.vue (4 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/dropdown/index.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/dropdown/vars.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/aurora-theme.js (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/vars.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/select/index.less (1 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/slider/index.less (2 hunks)
- packages/theme/src/slider/vars.less (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/dropdown/src/pc.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/select/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/select/src/pc.vue (2 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/slider/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/vue/src/slider/src/pc.vue (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon-composition-api.vue
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/action-menu/icon.vue
- packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/vars.less
Additional comments not posted (39)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable-composition-api.vue (1)
2-2: Verify the intended behavior of the slider component.The changes introduce two new props to the
<tiny-slider>component:
:show-input="true": This suggests that an input field will be displayed for users to enter values directly.unit="%": This indicates that the slider values will be in percentage format.However, the
disabledattribute is still present, which may prevent user interaction with the slider and contradict the purpose of adding the input field.Please confirm if the slider should remain in a disabled state or if user interaction is desired. If user interaction is intended, consider removing the
disabledattribute.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/dynamic-disable.vue (1)
2-2: LGTM!The changes to the
<tiny-slider>component align with the PR objectives and enhance the user interface by:
- Displaying an input field alongside the slider using the
:show-input="true"prop, allowing users to see and potentially modify the value directly.- Representing the value as a percentage using the
unit="%"prop.These additions provide more context and interactivity, even when the slider is disabled.
packages/vue/src/slider/package.json (1)
21-22: Provide more context about the dependency addition.The addition of the
@opentiny/vue-inputdependency to the@opentiny/vue-sliderpackage suggests that the slider component may now integrate with or utilize input features. This change itself looks fine, but to fully assess the implications and correctness of this dependency addition, more context is needed about how the slider component code has been modified to use this new dependency.Please provide more details about:
- What specific features or functionality from
@opentiny/vue-inputare being used in the slider component?- How has the slider component code been updated to integrate with or utilize the input features?
- Have any new props, events, or slots been added to the slider component's public API to expose the new input-related functionality?
Answering these questions will help ensure that the dependency addition is justified and has been integrated correctly into the slider component.
packages/theme/src/select-dropdown/aurora-theme.js (1)
5-5: Verify if the variable is defined.Using a variable for the box shadow is a good practice to maintain consistency across the theme. However, the comment suggests that the variable
--ti-common-shadow-2-downmight not be defined.Run the following script to verify if the variable is defined:
If the variable is not defined, do you want me to help define it or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border-composition-api.vue (1)
21-21: LGTM!The addition of the
typeattribute with value "primary" is a valid change that enhances the visual style of the dropdown component to indicate a primary action. The change is consistent with the existingborderandroundattributes and aligns with the scenario description.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/border.vue (1)
21-21: LGTM!The addition of the
type="primary"attribute to the<tiny-dropdown>component is a valid enhancement that aligns with the PR objective. This change should update the visual appearance of the dropdown to match the primary theme of the application.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level-composition-api.vue (5)
5-6: LGTM!The addition of line breaks is a presentational change that does not affect the functionality.
13-33: The new dropdown instances look good!The addition of multiple
tiny-dropdowninstances with varying configurations enhances the functionality and demonstrates different use cases. The use ofoptions1data allows for a multi-level dropdown structure, while theborderandtypeattributes modify the appearance. These changes align with the PR objective of improving the dropdown component.
65-83: Theoptions1data structure looks good!The introduction of the
options1reactive data provides a more complex structure for the dropdown component. The nested children allow for multi-level dropdown functionality, and the disabled options demonstrate the ability to disable specific dropdown items. These changes align with the PR objective of enhancing the dropdown's capabilities.
84-84: LGTM!The addition of an empty line after the
options1declaration improves code readability.
Line range hint
1-135: The changes in the file look good overall!The modifications introduce multiple instances of the
tiny-dropdowncomponent with different configurations, demonstrating various use cases and enhancing the dropdown's functionality. The use of theoptions1data structure allows for a multi-level dropdown, and theitemClickmethod provides a way to handle the selection of dropdown items. These changes align with the PR objective of improving the dropdown component.I didn't identify any missing requirements or potential improvements in the file. Great job!
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/multi-level.vue (3)
5-11: LGTM!The code segment correctly adds a new scenario that uses the
optionsproperty to define children for thetiny-dropdowncomponent, aligning with the existing code structure and the enhancements mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
12-32: LGTM!The code segment correctly adds three new instances of the
tiny-dropdowncomponent that use theoptions1data structure to define children, demonstrating variations with and without borders, as well as a dropdown with a primary type. These changes align with the existing code structure and the enhancements mentioned in the AI-generated summary to expand the component's usability.
69-87: LGTM!The code segment correctly adds a new data structure called
options1that contains a more complex hierarchy of options, including nested children and disabled states. Theoptions1data structure is properly defined and includes the necessary properties for the dropdown options. These changes align with the existing code structure and the enhancements mentioned in the AI-generated summary to expand the component's usability and provide a richer interaction model.packages/vue/src/dropdown-item/src/pc.vue (1)
16-16: LGTM!The conditional assignment of the
v-auto-tipdirective based on the truthiness ofgetTipis a good approach to ensure that the tooltip is only activated when necessary. This change prevents unnecessary tooltip rendering whengetTipis not available, aligning with the PR objective of addressing issues and introducing new functionality related to dropdown features.The code change is clean, concise, and does not introduce any obvious issues or code smells.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple-composition-api.vue (8)
5-14: LGTM!The addition of the
searchableattribute and the:disabledand:requiredattributes fortiny-optionelements enhances the component's functionality and user experience. The changes are implemented correctly.
40-40: LGTM!The addition of the
:multiple-limitandshow-limit-textattributes enhances the component's functionality by limiting the number of options that can be selected and displaying the limit text to the user. The changes are implemented correctly.
48-52: LGTM!The addition of the
:options,:dropdown-icon, and:drop-styleattributes enhances the component's customizability by allowing options to be passed as a prop, customizing the dropdown icon, and customizing the dropdown style. The changes are implemented correctly.
54-86: LGTM!The addition of multiple new scenarios (scenes 6 to 11) significantly enhances the component's usability and flexibility by showcasing various configurations such as disabling the select, display-only mode, showing all text tags, and handling required and disabled options with different interaction styles. The scenarios demonstrate how to handle various use cases and configurations. The changes are implemented correctly.
96-97: LGTM!The modification of
options1to includedisabledandrequiredproperties for specific options is consistent with the alterations mentioned in the AI-generated summary. Thedisabledandrequiredproperties add semantic meaning to the options. The changes are implemented correctly.
110-110: LGTM!The modification of
options2to include therequiredproperty for an option is consistent with the alterations mentioned in the AI-generated summary. Therequiredproperty adds semantic meaning to the option. The change is implemented correctly.
117-117: LGTM!The initialization of
value3with selected options is consistent with the alterations mentioned in the AI-generated summary. Initializingvalue3with selected options demonstrates the component's behavior when options are pre-selected. The change is implemented correctly.
119-119: LGTM!The initialization of
value5with multiple selected options is consistent with the alterations mentioned in the AI-generated summary. Initializingvalue5with multiple selected options demonstrates the component's behavior when multiple options are pre-selected. The change is implemented correctly.packages/theme/src/dropdown/vars.less (4)
17-17: LGTM!The change to increase the width of the SVG-only dropdown trigger icon is consistent with the height change and improves the visual appearance.
19-19: LGTM!The change to increase the height of the SVG-only dropdown trigger icon is consistent with the width change and improves the visual appearance.
21-21: LGTM!The change to use a normal background color for the hover state of the SVG-only trigger improves the visual feedback and consistency.
73-73: LGTM!The addition of the
--ti-dropdown-suffix-icon-colorand--ti-dropdown-suffix-icon-color-hovervariables enhances the visual feedback for the dropdown suffix icon. The variable names are descriptive and follow the naming convention, and the values are set to appropriate common color variables.Also applies to: 75-75
packages/theme/src/slider/vars.less (1)
98-99: LGTM!The new variable
--ti-slider-input-unit-text-color-disabledis a great addition that enhances the customization options and accessibility of the slider component. The variable name follows the existing naming convention, and the value maintains consistency by using a common variable for the disabled text color.packages/theme/src/dropdown/index.less (1)
186-201: LGTM!The new hover styles for
.tiny-button--defaultimprove the visual responsiveness of the dropdown by changing the fill color of the SVG icon on hover. Using CSS variables for color definitions is a good practice that enhances maintainability. The changes are consistent with the existing code patterns and naming conventions.packages/vue/src/slider/src/pc.vue (4)
80-94: LGTM!The changes in this code segment are consistent with the AI-generated summary. Using the
tiny-inputcomponent instead of a standard HTML input element can improve maintainability and styling consistency. Thev-modeldirective ensures that the input value is synchronized with the slider state, and the event handlers preserve the existing functionality while transitioning to the new component.
95-113: LGTM!The changes in this code segment are consistent with the AI-generated summary. Using the
tiny-inputcomponent for both inputs in the double value slider ensures consistency and maintainability. Thev-modeldirective synchronizes the input values with the slider state for both inputs, and the event handlers preserve the existing functionality while transitioning to the new component.
125-125: LGTM!The import statement for the
Inputcomponent is consistent with the AI-generated summary and is necessary for using theTinyInputcomponent in the template.
149-151: LGTM!The component registration for
TinyInputis consistent with the AI-generated summary and is necessary for using the component within the template.packages/theme/src/slider/index.less (2)
235-235: LGTM!Changing the display property to
flexfor the&__inputclass is a good choice as it enhances the layout capabilities of the input element, allowing for more flexible alignment and distribution of space among child elements.
266-269: LGTM!Introducing a new style rule to change the color of the unit text within the input when the
&__inputclass has the modifier classis-disabledis a great addition. This change enhances the visual feedback for users, clearly indicating the disabled state of the slider input. It improves accessibility and user experience by providing clear visual cues about the state of the component.packages/vue/src/select/src/index.ts (1)
248-248: Verify the impact of removing the default dropdown icon.The change removes the default visual representation of the dropdown icon, allowing for greater flexibility in specifying the icon by the user. However, it also means that the component will no longer have a default icon, which could impact the user experience if not properly handled.
Please ensure that this change aligns with the intended behavior and user experience. Consider adding documentation or examples to guide users on specifying the dropdown icon to maintain a consistent and intuitive interface.
packages/theme/src/select/index.less (1)
315-320: LGTM!The changes to the CSS styling rules within the
.is-hover-expand.is-disabledclass context for theselectcomponent are consistent with the AI-generated summary. The new rules ensure that the innerspanelements within the.@{select-prefix-cls}__tagsclass are displayed as inline-blocks, which may affect the layout and presentation of tags when the select component is in a disabled state and hovered over. This change enhances the visual structure of the tags, potentially improving user experience by ensuring consistent spacing and alignment.packages/vue/src/select/src/pc.vue (2)
155-155: LGTM!The changes correctly implement hiding the
tiny-tagwhen the component is disabled, in addition to the existingstate.isHiddencondition. The AI-generated summary accurately captures this modification.[consistent_summary]
230-230: LGTM!The formatting change to remove the semicolon at the end of the slot rendering line does not affect functionality and cleans up the code. The AI-generated summary accurately captures this modification.
[consistent_summary]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/size.spec.ts (3)
15-16: Temporary change acknowledged. Update once the button component is adapted.The comment correctly indicates that this change is temporary until the button component is fully adapted to the new specifications. Please ensure to update the expected height value once the adaptation is complete.
17-17: Add a comment to indicate the temporary nature of the change.Similar to the default dropdown button, please add a comment to indicate that this change is temporary until the button component is fully adapted to the new specifications. This will help maintain consistency and clarity in the code.
18-18: Add a comment to indicate the temporary nature of the change.Similar to the default dropdown button, please add a comment to indicate that this change is temporary until the button component is fully adapted to the new specifications. This will help maintain consistency and clarity in the code.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/copy-multi.spec.ts (1)
41-49: Improve test performance and remove debugging statementThe changes to the test case improve its reliability by ensuring that the copy icon is visible before interaction. However, consider the following suggestions to further optimize the test:
- Reduce the wait time before clicking the copy icon (e.g., from 2000ms to 500ms) to improve test execution speed.
- Remove the wait time after clicking the copy icon if it's not necessary for the test scenario.
- Remove the
console.logstatement at line 45 as it appears to be a debugging statement and may clutter the test output.Apply this diff to implement the suggestions:
const copyIcon = select.locator('.tiny-select__copy .tiny-svg') await select.hover() await page.waitForTimeout(300) -console.log(copyIcon) await expect(copyIcon).toBeVisible() -await page.waitForTimeout(2000) +await page.waitForTimeout(500) await copyIcon.click() -await page.waitForTimeout(3000)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/basic-usage.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/disabled.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/size.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/split-button.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/copy-multi.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/input-box-type.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/nest-grid-remote.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/nest-grid.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/nest-radio-grid-much-data.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (16)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/split-button.spec.ts (2)
15-15: LGTM!The assertion logic is correct, and the change in the expected background color value is accurate.
17-17: LGTM!The assertion logic is correct, and the change in the expected background color value is accurate.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/basic-usage.spec.ts (1)
30-31: LGTM!The test case has been appropriately updated to match the new expected behavior for the hover interaction on the dropdown menu item. The changes to the expected text color and background color CSS properties align with the modifications made to the dropdown component's visual styling.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/nest-radio-grid-much-data.spec.ts (3)
26-26: LGTM!The change in the expected class name aligns with the modifications to the styling or selection mechanism, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
27-27: LGTM!The reduction in the expected count of rows aligns with the modifications to the data being tested or the filtering logic, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
29-34: LGTM!The changes in the scrolling actions and row count checks align with the shift in the test's focus and the underlying data structure being validated, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/disabled.spec.ts (5)
14-14: LGTM!The assertion update aligns with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown component to xdesign themes by adjusting the expected color for disabled dropdown triggers.
15-15: LGTM!The assertion update aligns with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown component to xdesign themes by adjusting the expected fill color for SVG icons within disabled dropdowns.
38-39: LGTM!The assertion updates align with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown component to xdesign themes by adjusting the expected color for disabled text and trigger buttons within a dropdown.
41-41: LGTM!The assertion update aligns with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown component to xdesign themes by adjusting the expected fill color for SVG icons within disabled trigger buttons in a dropdown.
60-60: LGTM!The assertion update aligns with the PR objective of adapting the dropdown component to xdesign themes by adjusting the expected color for disabled dropdown menu items.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/input-box-type.spec.ts (3)
16-17: LGTM!The border color and SVG fill color expectations have been updated correctly to match the new UI theme.
37-37: LGTM!The border color and SVG fill color expectations for the disabled state have been updated correctly to match the new UI theme.
Also applies to: 39-39
62-63: LGTM!The border color and SVG fill color expectations for the multi-select component have been updated correctly to match the new UI theme.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/nest-grid.spec.ts (1)
24-24: Verify the consistency of the class change with the grid component behavior.The change in the expected class for the selected row seems to align with the AI-generated summary. However, please ensure that the new classes
tiny-grid-body__rowandrow__selectedare consistent with the actual behavior of the grid component after the changes.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/nest-grid-remote.spec.ts (1)
31-31: Verify if the corresponding code has been updated consistently.The change in the expected class for the selected row is appropriate and aligns with the new class naming convention.
Ensure that the corresponding code that sets these classes (
tiny-grid-body__rowandrow__selected) has been updated consistently across the codebase.Run the following script to verify the usage of these classes:
Verification successful
Verification successful: Class usage is consistent across the codebase
The change in the expected class for the selected row (
tiny-grid-body__row row__selected) is consistent with the usage across the codebase. This combination of classes is used in multiple component definitions and test files, including:
- Component definitions in
body.tsx- Test files such as
nest-grid.spec.ts,nest-radio-grid-much-data.spec.ts, andnest-grid-remote.spec.tsThe widespread and consistent use of these classes indicates that the corresponding code has been updated appropriately throughout the project.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `tiny-grid-body__row` and `row__selected` classes. # Test 1: Search for the usage of `tiny-grid-body__row` class. # Expect: Occurrences in the codebase where this class is being set. rg --type typescript $'tiny-grid-body__row' # Test 2: Search for the usage of `row__selected` class. # Expect: Occurrences in the codebase where this class is being set. rg --type typescript $'row__selected'Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `tiny-grid-body__row` and `row__selected` classes in TypeScript files. # Test 1: Search for the usage of `tiny-grid-body__row` class in .ts and .tsx files. echo "Searching for 'tiny-grid-body__row' class:" rg -C 2 'tiny-grid-body__row' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}' # Test 2: Search for the usage of `row__selected` class in .ts and .tsx files. echo "Searching for 'row__selected' class:" rg -C 2 'row__selected' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}' # Test 3: Search for any class assignment that includes 'row' in .ts and .tsx files. echo "Searching for class assignments including 'row':" rg -C 2 'class=.*row' --glob '*.{ts,tsx}'Length of output: 12682
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/automatic-dropdown.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-35: Consider adding more test cases.The current test cases cover the basic functionality of the automatic dropdown, such as:
- Not dropping down when the input is focused and not searchable
- Automatically dropping down when the input is focused and searchable
- Selecting an option and verifying the selected state
To further improve the test coverage, consider adding test cases for:
- Typing in the input and verifying the dropdown filters the options
- Selecting an option using the keyboard (arrow keys and Enter)
- Verifying the dropdown closes when an option is selected or when clicking outside
- Testing the behavior when there are no options available
- Checking the disabled state of the component
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple.spec.ts (1)
43-50: Improve test readability and maintainability.The change to individually assert the expected classes for each option enhances clarity and helps identify issues with the selection state more effectively. However, the repeated assertions can be refactored to improve readability and maintainability.
Consider applying this diff to refactor the assertions:
- await expect(list[0]).toHaveClass(/selected hover is-required/) - await expect(list[1]).toHaveClass(/is-disabled/) - await expect(list[2]).toHaveClass(/selected/) - await expect(list[3]).toHaveClass(/is-disabled/) - await expect(list[4]).toHaveClass(/is-disabled/) - await expect(list[5]).toHaveClass(/is-disabled/) - await expect(list[6]).toHaveClass(/is-disabled/) + const expectedClasses = [ + /selected hover is-required/, + /is-disabled/, + /selected/, + /is-disabled/, + /is-disabled/, + /is-disabled/, + /is-disabled/ + ]; + + for (let i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { + await expect(list[i]).toHaveClass(expectedClasses[i]); + }This refactoring stores the expected classes in an array and uses a loop to perform the assertions, reducing duplication and making the test more concise and maintainable.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/basic-usage.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/size.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/automatic-dropdown.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple.spec.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/size.spec.ts
Additional comments not posted (5)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/automatic-dropdown.spec.ts (1)
12-12: Verify the border color change is intentional and consistent.The border color of the input element when focused has been changed from 'rgb(94, 124, 224)' to 'rgb(25, 25, 25)'. Confirm that this change aligns with the intended design and is consistently applied across other similar components.
Run the following script to check the border color of focused input elements in other test files:
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/dropdown/basic-usage.spec.ts (2)
16-19: Verify the SVG path change is intentional and matches the design.The expected SVG path for the dropdown arrow has been updated to a more complex shape. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended design and visual style of the dropdown component.
To verify the SVG path change across the codebase, run the following script:
33-34: Confirm the color and background-color changes are intentional.The expected color and background-color of the dropdown menu item on hover have been updated. The text color has changed from 'rgb(82, 110, 204)' to 'rgb(25, 25, 25)', and the background color has changed from 'rgb(242, 245, 252)' to 'rgb(245, 245, 245)'.
Verify that these changes align with the intended design and user experience of the dropdown component when hovering over menu items.
To verify the color and background-color changes across the codebase, run the following script:
Verification successful
Color changes are verified and consistent across the codebase.
The updated colors (text color: rgb(25, 25, 25) / #191919, background color: rgb(245, 245, 245) / #f5f5f5) are consistently applied throughout the project. These changes appear in multiple theme files, component styles, and test specifications, indicating an intentional update to the design system. The widespread and consistent use of these colors suggests that the changes are deliberate and have been thoroughly implemented.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the color and background-color of dropdown menu items on hover # are consistent across the codebase. # Test: Search for the color and background-color in CSS and SCSS files. # Expect: Consistent usage of the new color and background-color. rg --type-add 'css:*.css' --type-add 'scss:*.scss' --type css --type scss -A 5 \ $'color:\s*rgb\(25,\s*25,\s*25\)' $'background-color:\s*rgb\(245,\s*245,\s*245\)'Length of output: 245
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for color values in various file types and formats # Search for RGB color values echo "Searching for RGB color values:" rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type-add 'js:*.js' --type-add 'css:*.css' --type-add 'scss:*.scss' \ --type ts --type js --type css --type scss -n \ 'rgb\(25,\s*25,\s*25\)|rgb\(245,\s*245,\s*245\)' # Search for hexadecimal color values (equivalent to rgb(25, 25, 25) and rgb(245, 245, 245)) echo -e "\nSearching for hexadecimal color values:" rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type-add 'js:*.js' --type-add 'css:*.css' --type-add 'scss:*.scss' \ --type ts --type js --type css --type scss -n \ '#191919|#f5f5f5' # Search for potential color variable definitions echo -e "\nSearching for potential color variable definitions:" rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type-add 'js:*.js' --type-add 'css:*.css' --type-add 'scss:*.scss' \ --type ts --type js --type css --type scss -n \ '(var|const|let)\s+.*color.*=.*(\b191919\b|\bf5f5f5\b)' # Look for global styling or theming files echo -e "\nSearching for global styling or theming files:" fd -e ts -e js -e css -e scss | rg '(global|theme|style)'Length of output: 27831
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple.spec.ts (2)
38-38: LGTM!The change to click on the third option (
.nth(2)) aligns with the test case description and the subsequent assertions. It helps validate the selection limit functionality accurately.
13-13: Verify the usage of.nth(0)in the codebase.The change to use
.nth(0)to specifically target the first instance of the suffix element is a good improvement for test reliability. However, it's important to ensure that this change aligns with the actual implementation and usage of the select component throughout the codebase.Run the following script to verify the usage of
.tiny-input__suffixand.nth()in the codebase:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/size.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/show-input.spec.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/renderless/src/slider/index.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/multiple.spec.ts
Additional comments not posted (6)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/slider/show-input.spec.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM!The updated locator correctly targets the slider input element, reflecting the changes in the HTML structure.
20-20: LGTM!The wait timeout after hovering over the slider block should help improve the reliability of the test by ensuring the UI is in a stable state before proceeding.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/select/size.spec.ts (2)
12-12: Verify the impact of the default size change on visual consistency.The change in the expected height for the default size of the component from
28pxto32pxseems to be intentional and aligns with the modifications mentioned in the AI summary.However, please ensure this change is consistent with the design specifications and does not introduce any unintended visual discrepancies across the application. Consider running visual regression tests or manually verifying the component's appearance in different contexts to confirm the change is appropriate.
43-43: Verify the expected height aligns with the design specifications.The change to use
toBeCloseTo(28, 1)instead of a hardcoded height value provides more flexibility in the height comparison, which is a good practice.However, please ensure the expected height of approximately
28pxaligns with the design specifications and intended behavior for the small size variant of the component. Double-check the design documents or consult with the design team to confirm this expectation is correct.packages/renderless/src/slider/index.ts (2)
Line range hint
644-648: LGTM!The changes to the
handleSlotInputfunction signature simplify the usage by defaultingisLeftInputtotrue. The function logic remains correct and the behavior is unaltered.
Line range hint
654-661: Verify the function parameter change in the codebase.The changes to the
inputOnChangefunction parameter improve clarity and simplify the usage by directly accepting the input value as a string. The function logic remains correct.However, ensure that all invocations of
inputOnChangehave been updated to pass the input value instead of the event object.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Changes to
inputOnChangefunction are correctly implemented and used.The
inputOnChangefunction has been successfully updated to acceptcurrentValue: stringas a parameter. All usages of this function in the codebase have been verified:
- In Vue components (
mobile-first.vue,mobile.vue,pc.vue), the function is correctly bound to the@changeevent, which automatically passes the input value.- No instances of passing an event object to
inputOnChangewere found.The changes have been consistently applied across the codebase, maintaining the intended functionality while improving clarity and type safety.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all invocations of `inputOnChange` pass the input value directly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: No occurrences of passing the event object. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'inputOnChange'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for inputOnChange function declarations and usages # Find TypeScript files and search for inputOnChange fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs grep -n "inputOnChange" -A 5 # Fallback: Search all files for inputOnChange (in case .ts/.tsx are not used) grep -rn "inputOnChange" -A 5 .Length of output: 6123
| // TODO: 此处继承input 尺寸的话，应该是32 | ||
| await expect(input.locator('.tiny-input__inner')).toHaveCSS('height', '40px') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address the inconsistency between the TODO comment and the test expectation.
The TODO comment suggests that the input height for the medium size should be 32px, but the test is expecting a height of 40px. This inconsistency could lead to confusion and potential issues.
Please either:
- Update the test to expect a height of
32pxif that is the correct intended behavior:
- await expect(input.locator('.tiny-input__inner')).toHaveCSS('height', '40px')
+ await expect(input.locator('.tiny-input__inner')).toHaveCSS('height', '32px')- Remove the TODO comment if the current expectation of
40pxis correct and the comment is no longer relevant.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style
Chores