feat(grid): [grid] grid custom panel adapt to x-design #2152
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes primarily focus on enhancing the localization of a Vue.js application's grid components by replacing dynamic title rendering functions with static Chinese strings for column headers. This includes modifications to various files where specific rendering functions have been removed, and new columns have been added to improve data representation. Additionally, there are adjustments to styling and layout in various components, contributing to a more streamlined and user-friendly interface. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/drag/row-drag-ctrl-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/drag/row-drag-ctrl.spec.js (2 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/drag/row-drag-ctrl.vue (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/editor/mutil-render.spec.js (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/filter/simple-date-filter.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/highlight/highlight-hover-row.spec.js (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/large-data/full-data-loading.spec.js (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/renderer/inner-renderer-rate.spec.js (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/renderer/inner-renderer.spec.js (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/size/adaptive-column-width.spec.js (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/size/max-min-grid-height.spec.js (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/slot/editor-slot.spec.js (1 hunks)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/tree-table/tree-grid-index.spec.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/drag/row-drag-ctrl-composition-api.vue
- examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/drag/row-drag-ctrl.vue
Additional comments not posted (21)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/renderer/inner-renderer.spec.js (1)
7-7: LGTM!The test case has been updated to reflect the new expected background color for the cell displaying a percentage value. The change aligns with the modifications in the visual representation of the cell, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/highlight/highlight-hover-row.spec.js (1)
9-9: LGTM!The change to the expected background color for a hovered grid row looks good. It aligns with the PR objective of refining the visual feedback for the hover effect.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/size/max-min-grid-height.spec.js (2)
6-6: Verify the visual presentation with the updated max-height value.The change in the expected max-height value for the first grid body wrapper element appears to be a refinement in the layout specifications. Please ensure that the new value of '160px' aligns with the design specifications and does not introduce any visual regressions.
7-7: Verify the visual presentation with the updated min-height value.The change in the expected min-height value for the second grid body wrapper element appears to be a refinement in the layout specifications. Please ensure that the new value of '260px' aligns with the design specifications and does not introduce any visual regressions.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/size/adaptive-column-width.spec.js (2)
8-8: LGTM!The updated width assertion for the first table header cell aligns with the new design requirements or usability improvements mentioned in the PR summary. The increased width threshold ensures that the cell has sufficient space to display its content.
12-12: Looks good!The updated width assertion for the second table header cell is consistent with the changes made to the first cell. The increased maximum width threshold allows for more flexibility in the cell's content while still maintaining the desired layout.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/editor/mutil-render.spec.js (1)
6-9: LGTM!Setting the viewport size before executing the test actions is a good practice. It ensures that the test environment closely resembles a typical user scenario, which can potentially improve the reliability of the test outcomes.
The chosen viewport size of 1600x1200 pixels is a common desktop resolution. This may enhance the visibility and interaction with the UI elements during the test, ensuring that they are properly visible and clickable.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/large-data/full-data-loading.spec.js (2)
9-9: LGTM!The assertion has been updated to check the visibility of the cell with the name '28' after scrolling 1000 pixels, which aligns with the changes mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
15-15: LGTM!The assertion has been updated to check the visibility of the cell with the name '153' after scrolling 5000 pixels, which aligns with the changes mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/renderer/inner-renderer-rate.spec.js (2)
7-7: LGTM!The change in the expected background color for the
redCellassertion looks good. The new colorrgb(242, 48, 48)is a shade of red, which aligns with the variable name.
9-9: LGTM!The change in the expected background color for the
yellowCellassertion looks good. The new colorrgb(255, 136, 0)is a shade of yellow, which aligns with the variable name.examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/tree-table/tree-grid-index.spec.js (4)
6-6: LGTM!The selector change aligns with the component's refactored design while maintaining the intended functionality of expanding the row.
9-11: LGTM!The selector change aligns with the component's refactored design while maintaining the intended functionality of expanding the row.
12-12: LGTM!The selector change aligns with the component's refactored design while maintaining the intended functionality of expanding the row.
16-18: LGTM!The selector change aligns with the component's refactored design while maintaining the intended functionality of expanding the row.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/filter/simple-date-filter.spec.ts (3)
6-9: LGTM!Setting the viewport size is a good practice to ensure consistent behavior across different screen sizes. The chosen viewport size of 1600x1200 pixels is a common desktop resolution.
11-11: LGTM!The selector update for the start date input element reflects the necessary adaptation to the current implementation of the date filter UI, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
15-15: LGTM!The selector update for the end date input element reflects the necessary adaptation to the current implementation of the date filter UI, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/drag/row-drag-ctrl.spec.js (2)
7-10: LGTM!Setting a specific viewport size before executing the drag-and-drop actions is a good practice. It ensures that the test environment accurately reflects the expected user interface dimensions, which can affect the positioning and behavior of draggable elements. This improves the robustness and reliability of the test.
30-30: Verify the impact of the vertical movement adjustment.Adjusting the vertical movement of the mouse during the drag action from 200 pixels up to 240 pixels up may be aimed at refining the drag behavior to ensure that the element is dragged to the correct position or to accommodate changes in the layout or design of the grid.
Please ensure that this change in the vertical movement results in the expected behavior and does not introduce any unintended side effects. Consider running the test with different grid layouts and designs to verify the robustness of the drag-and-drop functionality.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/grid/slot/editor-slot.spec.js (1)
6-9: LGTM!Setting the viewport size is a good practice to simulate specific screen sizes in tests. The chosen dimensions (1600x1200) are reasonable for testing desktop layouts. This enhances the test's ability to accurately verify the layout and functionality under different display conditions.
| const blueCell = page.getByRole('cell', { name: '60.0500%' }).nth(1).locator('.tiny-grid__rate-chart') | ||
| await expect(blueCell).toHaveCSS('background-color', 'rgb(94, 124, 224)') | ||
| await expect(blueCell).toHaveCSS('background-color', 'rgb(25, 25, 25)') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the mismatch between the variable name and the expected color.
The variable name blueCell implies that the expected color should be a shade of blue, but the actual color used in the assertion is black rgb(25, 25, 25). This mismatch could lead to confusion and potential bugs in the codebase.
Consider updating either the variable name or the expected color to ensure consistency and clarity. For example:
-const blueCell = page.getByRole('cell', { name: '60.0500%' }).nth(1).locator('.tiny-grid__rate-chart')
+const blackCell = page.getByRole('cell', { name: '60.0500%' }).nth(1).locator('.tiny-grid__rate-chart')or
-await expect(blueCell).toHaveCSS('background-color', 'rgb(25, 25, 25)')
+await expect(blueCell).toHaveCSS('background-color', 'rgb(0, 0, 255)')Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style