Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Per host channels #1333

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: jakubk/stick-queue
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

jkozlowski
Copy link
Contributor

Before this PR

After this PR

==COMMIT_MSG==

==COMMIT_MSG==

Possible downsides?

@jkozlowski jkozlowski changed the title Route to host. Per host channels Jul 16, 2021
@jkozlowski jkozlowski changed the base branch from ckozak/stick to jakubk/stick-queue July 16, 2021 12:37
return endpoint(endpoint).execute(request);
}
})
.collect(ImmutableList.toImmutableList());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this piece is more or less the alternative described here, except that we don't leverage it from the StickySessionFactory.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah: I think it's valuable to provide wholesale fairness implementation. If we're not going to ship the whole thing (i.e. you can support internal usecase for per-transaction fairness, with ability to create a new sticky channel from an existing sticky channel with new queue), I'd be happy to switch to per-host queues even for sticky channels. The reason I added it in #1334 is because I wanted to ship the whole thing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants